Abstract
The field of neuropsychology as practiced clinically has been driven in large part by the development and application of standardized diagnostic procedures that are more sensitive than medical examinations to changes in behavior, in particular higher cognitive processes, as related to brain function. The techniques and methods so derived have led to major conceptual and theoretical advances in the understanding of normal and abnormal patterns of brain—behavior relationships. Despite the apparent utility of many of the neuropsychological tests discussed in this volume, their psychometric properties leave much to be desired. Much of their utility comes from the clinical acumen and experience of their users and developers, a situation that has, historically, made clinical neuropsychology more difficult to teach than should be the case. In fact, much of today’s practice and yesterday’s theoretical advances in clinical neuropsychology stem from intense and insightful observation of brain-damaged individuals by such astute observers as Ward Halstead, A. R. Luria, Hans Teuber, Karl Pribram, Roger Sperry, and others. These superstars of clinical neuropsychology were state-of-the-art researchers (though the state-of-the-art was often crude) to be sure, but their greatest inspirations came from their constant monitoring and informal interactions with the behavior of persons suffering from a variety of neurological trauma and disease. Halstead roamed the halls of Otho S. S. Sprague making notes as he observed behavior among brain-damaged individuals; Luria gained great insights into brain function with his rather informal, sometimes impromptu, bedside examination and discussions with soldiers with head injury; Sperry and his students followed and observed a series of “split-brain” patients going about their daily activities, even to the point of observing some as they dressed themselves and while engaged in leisure activities with others.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adams, R. L. (1985). Review of the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Algozzine, B., Forgnone, C., Mercer, C., and Trifiletti, J. (1979). Toward defining discrepancies for specific learning disabilities: An analysis and alternative. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 25–31.
Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, norms, and equivalent scores. In R. L. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement ( 2nd ed. ). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
Bersoff, D. N. (1982). The legal regulation of school psychology. In C. R. Reynolds and T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: Wiley.
Boder, E., and Jarrico, S. (1982). Boder test of reading-spelling patterns. New York: Grune and Stratton.
Burns, E. (1982). The use and interpretation of standard grade equivalents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 17–18.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Cattin, P. (1980). Note on the estimation of the squared cross-validated multiple correlation of a regression model. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 63–65.
Coles, G. S. (1978). The learning disabilities test battery: Empirical and social issues. Howard Educational Review, 4, 313–340.
Cone, T. E., and Wilson, L. R. (1981). Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 359–371.
Cooley, W. W., andLohnes, P. R. (1971). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Wiley.
Cronbach, L. J., and Gleser, G. C. (1953). Assessing similarity between profiles. Psychological Bulletin, 50, 456–473.
Danielson, L. C., and Bauer, J. N. (1978). A formula-based classification of learning disabled children: An examination of the issues. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 11, 163–176.
Davis, F. B. (1959). Interpretation of differences among average and individual test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 162–170.
Dean, R. S. (1978). Distinguishing learning-disabled and emotionally disturbed children on the WISC-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 381–382.
Dean, R. S. (1985). Review of the Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), The ninth mental measurements yearbook. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Dunleavy, R. A., Hansen, J. L., and Baade, L. E. (1981). Discriminating powers of Halstead Battery tests in assessment of 9 to 14 year old severely asthmatic children. Clinical Neuropsychology, 3, 9–12.
Fuller, G. B., and Goh, D. S. (1981). Intelligence, achievement, and visual-motor performance among learning disabled and emotionally impaired children. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 262–268.
Glass, G. V. (1978). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. In L. Shulman (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 5, 351–379.
Golden, C. J. (1981). Diagnosis and rehabilitation in clinical neuropsychology ( 2nd ed. ). Springfield, IL: Thomas.
Golden, C. J., Moses, J. A., Jr., Graber, B., and Berg, T. (1981). Objective clinical rules for interpreting the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery: Derivation, effectiveness, and validation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 616–68.
Gordon, R. A. (1984). Digits backward and the Mercer-Kamin law: An empirical response to Mercer’s treatment of internal validity of IQ tests. In C. R. Reynolds and R. T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on Bias in Mental Testing. New York: Plenum.
Gutkin, T. B., and Reynolds, C. R. (September, 1980). Normative Data for Interpreting Reitan’s Index of Wechsler Subtest Scatter. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.
Hanna, G. S., Dyck, N. J., and Holen, M. C. (1979). Objective analysis of achievement-aptitude discrepancies in LD classi-fication. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 32–38.
Hynd, G. (Ed.). (1981). Neuropsychology in the schools. School Psychology Review, 10(3).
Jastak, J. F., and Jastak, S. (1978). Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, DE: Jastak.
Kaufman, A. S. (1976a). A new approach to the interpretation of test scatter on the WISC-R. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 160–167.
Kaufman, A. S. (1976b). Verbal-performance IQ discrepancies on the WISC-R. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 9, 739–744. Kaufman, A. S. (1979). Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
Kaufman, A. S., and Kaufman, N. L. (1983). Kaufman assessment battery for children: Interpretive manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Lord, F. M., and Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental tests. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Malloy, P. F., and Webster, J. S. (1981). Detecting mild brain impairment using the Luria-Nebraska Neuropsychological Battery. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 768–770.
Matarazzo, J. D. (1972). Wechsler’s measurement and appraisal of adult intelligence. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory ( 2nd ed. ). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Osgood, C. E., and Suci, G. J. (1952). A measurement of relation determined by both mean differences and profile interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 251–262.
Parsons, O. A., and Prigatano, G. P. (1978). Methodological considerations in clinical neuropsychological research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 608–619.
Piotrowski, R. J. (1978). Abnormality of subtest score differences on the WISC-R. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 569–570.
Plake, B. S., Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. (1981). A technique for the comparison of profile variability between independent groups. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 37, 14 2146.
Punisch, A. D., Golden, C. J., and Hammeke. T. A. (1979). Dis-crimination of schizophrenic and brain injured patients by a standardized version of Luria’s neuropsychological tests. Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 53–59.
Reynolds, C. R. (1979a). Interpreting the index of abnormality when the distribution of score differences is known: Comment on Piotrowski. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 401–402.
Reynolds, C. R. (1979b). Objectivity of scoring for the McCarthy Drawing Tests. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 367–368.
Reynolds, C. R. (1981a). The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C. R. Reynolds and T. B. Gutkin (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology. New York: Wiley.
Reynolds, C. R. (1981b). Screening tests: Problems and promises. In N. Lamberts (Ed.), Special Education Assessment Matrix. Monterey, CA: CTB McGraw Hill.
Reynolds, C. R. (1982). The importance of norms and other traditional psychometric concepts to assessment in clinical neuro-psychology. In R. N. Malatesha and L. C. Hartlage (Eds.), Neuropsychology and cognition (Vol. II ). The Hague: Nijhoff.
Reynolds; C. R. (1983). Some new and some unusual educational and psychological tests. School Psychology Review, 12,481488.
Reynolds, C. R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–476.
Reynolds, C. R. (1986). Clinical acumen but psychometric naivete in neuropsychological assessment of educational disorders. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 121–138.
Reynolds, C. R., and Clark, J. H. (1985). Profile analysis of standardized intelligence test performance of very low functioning individuals. Journal of School Psychology, 23, 277283.
Reynolds, C. R., and Clark, J. H. (1986). Profile analysis of standardized intelligence test performance of very high functioning individuals. Psychology in the Schools, 23, 5–12.
Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. (1979). Predicting the premorbid intellectual status of children using demographic data. Clinical Neuropsychology, 1, 36–38.
Reynolds, C. R., and Gutkin, T. B. (1980). Statistics related to profile interpretation of the Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 316–319.
Reynolds, C. R., Hartlage, L. C., and Haak, R. ( 1980, September). Lateral preference as determined by neuropsychological per- formance and aptitude/achievement discrepancies. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal.
Reynolds, C. R., and Kaufman, A. S. (1986). Clinical assessment of children’s intelligence with the Wechsler Scales. In B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of intelligence. New York: Wiley.
Reynolds, C. R., and Willson, V. L. ( 1983, January). Standardized grade equivalents: Really! No. Well, sort of, but they lead to the valley of the shadow of misinterpretation and confusion. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the Southwestern Educational Research Association, Houston.
Roffe, M. W., and Bryant, C. K. (1979). How reliable are MSCA profile interpretations? Psychology in the Schools, /6, 14–18.
Rourke, B. P. (1975). Brain-behavior relationships in children with learning disabilities: A research program. American Psychologist, 30, 911–920.
Sandoval, J. ( 1981, August). Can neuropsychology contribute to rehabilitation in educational settings? No. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles.
Sattler, J. M. (1974). Assessment of children’s intelligence. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Satz, P., Taylor, H. G., Friel, J., and Fletcher, J. (1978). Some developmental and predictive precursors of reading disabilities: A six year follow-up. In A. L. Benton and D. Pearl (Eds.), Dyslexia: An appraisal of current knowledge. New York: Oxford University Press.
Selz, M., and Reitan, R. M. (1979). Rules for neuropsychological diagnosis: Classification of brain functions in older children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 258–264.
Tabachnick, B. G. (1979). Test scatter on the WISC-R. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 60–62.
Taylor, R. L., and Imivey, J. K. (1980). Diagnostic use of the WISC-R and McCarthy Scales: A regression analysis approach to learning disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 17, 327–330.
Thompson, R. J. (1980). The diagnostic utility of WISC-R measures with children referred to a developmental evaluation center. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 440–447.
Thomdike, R. L., and Hagen, E. P. (1977). Measurement and evaluation in psychology and education ( 4th ed. ). New York: Wiley.
USOE. (1976). Education of handicapped children: Assistance to states: Proposed rulemaking. Federal Register, 41, 524045 2407.
Wallbrown, F. H., Vance, H., and Pritchard, K. K. (1979). Discriminating between attitudes expressed by normal and disabled readers. Psychology in the Schools, 4, 472–477.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Wherry, R. J., Sr. (1932). A new formula for predicting the shrinkage of the coefficient for multiple correlation. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 2, 404–457.
Williams, N. H. (1976). Arousal and information processing in learning disabled children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Willson, V. L., and Reynolds, C. R. (1982). Methodological and statistical problems in determining membership in clinical populations. Clinical Neuropsychology, 4, 134–138.
Willson, V. L., and Reynolds, C. R. (in press). Classroom applications of educational measurement. New York: MacMillan.
Wright, L., Schaefer, A. B., and Solomon, G. (1979). Encyclopedia of pediatric psychology. Baltimore: University Park Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Reynolds, C.R. (1989). Measurement and Statistical Problems in Neuropsychological Assessment of Children. In: Reynolds, C.R., Fletcher-Janzen, E. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Child Neuropsychology. Critical Issues in Neuropsychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6807-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6807-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-6809-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6807-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive