Skip to main content

A study of family networks and relationships in community midwifery

  • Chapter
  • 94 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter Jean Davies describes a study that she undertook in order to explore family networks in the community in which she worked. Her interest in this aspect of the neighbourhood arose from the conversations and experiences that she had had visiting women and their babies over a period of 4 years as a midwife. In Jean’s study practice was clearly a stimulus for research but, as her chapter shows, the relationship between research and practice was more complex and intimate than this. Jean uses the phrase ‘practitioner observation’ to describe this relationship, and this exemplifies some of the issues at the heart of practitioner research. Many readers will be familiar with the term ‘participant observation’, which is used to describe a method of collecting data in qualitative research. In participant observation the researcher enters a field as a participant; in other words, they take part in the activities that they observe. This may vary from complete participation, where the researcher acts as a full member of staff, for example, or there may be some limits imposed on the participation that occurs, and the researcher may restrict their activities to well-defined areas. Whatever the role chosen, the principles of participant observation are that the researcher is immersed in the world that they are studying, in order to gain an intimate familiarity with it and to collect detailed data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Darton, Longman and Todd (1981) Dictionary of Medical Ethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K. Sociological Methods, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, F. (1987) An Evaluation Report. The Newcastle Community Midwifery Care Project, Newcastle Health Authority, Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G. (1963) Retreading research materials: the use of secondary analysis by the independent researcher. American Behavioral Scientist, 6, 11–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, J. (1992) Secondary data analysis in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17(7), 877–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, B. (1981) A Medieval Woman’s Guide to Health. Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • UKCC (1991) Midwives’ Code Of Practice, United Kingdom Central Council for Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Visiting, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davies, J. (1995). A study of family networks and relationships in community midwifery. In: Reed, J., Procter, S. (eds) Practitioner Research in Health Care. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6627-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6627-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-49810-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6627-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics