Advertisement

The Absolute Measurement of Volume

  • A. H. Cook

Abstract

A particular volume is an arbitrary quantity of no general interest and the measurement of volume acquires importance only as a means to the determination of density in absolute terms. This chapter is concerned with the measurement of volume as a step in the determination of the density of a fluid or solid and thus towards the establishment of fundamental relations between physical constants. It is of interest, however, to look back over the history of measurements of volume for, in the past, units of volume had a more significant place in systems of measurement than they occupy today. Many substances of trade, such as corn, meal, milk or wine, were measured by volume rather than by mass and so reasonably accurate measures of capacity were provided in all pre-Metric systems of measurement from Babylonian and Egyptian times onwards. In the early scientific period it became possible to weigh liquids much more accurately than to measure volumes and so the measures of capacity came to be defined in terms of the mass of liquid they contained at a given temperature, as indeed the English gallon is legally defined today.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

VIII. References

  1. 1.
    Barrell, H. and R. Marriner. Brit. Sci. News, 2, 130 (1948).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batuecas, T. and J. I. F. Alonso. An. Soc. Esp. Fis. Quim. 44B, 1101 (1948).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Batuecas, T. and F. L. Casado, J. Chem. Phys. 33, 41 (1936).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chappuis, P. Trav. Bur. Int. Poids Mes. 14, B.1 (1910).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook, A. H. J. Sci. Instrum. 34, 455 (1957).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cook, A. H. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 254, 125 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cook, A. H. Interference of Electromagnetic Waves, ix + 253 pp. Clarendon Press: Oxford (1971).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cook, A. H. and N. W. B. Stone, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. A, 250, 279 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Curtis, I., I. Morgan, M. Hart and A. B. Milne. ‘A new determination of Avogadro’s number.’ In Precision Measurements and Fundamental Constants, US National Bureau of Standards: Sci. Publ. No. 343, pp 285–290. Washington, DC (1971).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guye, P. A. and T. Batuecas. J. Chem. Phys. 20, 308 (1923).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hart, M. J. Phys. D, 1, 1405 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hart, M. and U. Bonse. Acta Crystallogr. A.A, 24, 240 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    de Lépinay, J. M., J. M. Buisson and J. R. Benoît. Trav. Bur. Int. Poids Mes. 14, C.1 (1910).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marek, W. J. Trav. Bur. Int. Poids Mes. 2, D.54 (1883).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rolt, F. H. and H. Barrell. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 116, 401 (1927).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scheel, K. and F. Blankenstein. Z. Phys. 31, 202 (1925).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thiesen, M. and K. Schell. Z. InstrumKde, 18, 138 (1898).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1968

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. H. Cook
    • 1
  1. 1.Cavendish LaboratoryUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations