Abstract
Collaborative tests are more usual in the measurement of biological response—bioassay of drugs, vitamins, plant stimulants, insecticides, cosmetics, flavours, preferences and other imponderables generally—than in the physical sciences, which are optimistically credited with being somehow above such things. This feeling of the infallibility of instrumentation is the laboratory equivalent of another social stratum’s blind belief in the newspaper: ‘If it’s in print it must be right.’ It is only when people begin to disagree over results that a call is made for a test on a wider scale than is possible in one laboratory, involving several different instruments in different laboratories, all testing the same material or method. Understandably, such inter-laboratory tests almost always show substantially greater divergences than intra-laboratory tests (made on different instruments within one laboratory). A psycho-ergonomic study of this difference in behaviour might be rewarding.
Quot homines, tot sententiae
Terence Phormio II iv 14
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1966 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edisbury, J.R. (1966). Collaborative Tests. In: Practical Hints on Absorption Spectrometry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6401-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6401-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-6198-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6401-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive