Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Community legal order

  • Chapter
Judicial Protection in the European Communities

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

Each State has its own body of interlocking and complementary legal rules which taken together govern the legal relationships within the country. Within Community law these bodies of legal rules are normally called ‘legal orders’.1 Apart from these national legal orders international organizations have legal orders of their own.2 In comparison with these the legal order of the European Communities is of particular significance not only because of the large number of rules it contains, and the preponderance and the frequent direct effect of these rules for a large group of people, but also due to its homogeneity.3 Most international organizations embody their binding legal rules in treaties or conventions. These obtain force of law only after ratification by the States concerned. As in practice not all States ratify every convention, the binding force of conventions differs as regards territorial application. This precludes one convention being used for completing another. Because of the fact that not all legal rules bind the same States, they cannot form one legal order; each convention constitutes a legal order of its own. In the European Communities the three Treaties and all the rules of secondary Community law taken together form one legal order, equally binding within all Member States. The inherent unity of this legal order is of the greatest importance for its further development.4

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. This may not be a well known English expression, but it seems appropriate, see Lord MacKenzie Stuart. The European Communities and the Rule of Law, Hamlyn Lectures Stevens 1977, pp. 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henry G. Schermers, International Institutional Law, Vol. 2, Sijthoff 1972. Chapter Eight (pp. 458–536).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See also Helmut Strebel, Quellen des Völkerrechts als Rechtsordnung, 36 Zaörv (1976), pp. 301–346.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Walter Ganshof van der Meersch, L’ordre juridique des Communautés européennes et le droit international, 148 RdC (1975V), pp. 1–433.

    Google Scholar 

  5. On the Community legal order see Riccardo Monaco, The Limits of the European Community Order, 1 ELRev. (1976), pp. 269–281.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On the question whether there are three Community legal orders or one, see Albert Bleckmann, Die Einheit der Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechtsordnung — Einheit oder Mehrheit der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, 13 EuR (1978), pp. 95–104.

    Google Scholar 

  7. For more examples see Henry G. Schermers, The European Court of Justice: Promoter of European integration, 22 AJCL (1974) pp. 459–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. See also: Gerhard Köpenik. Die Ausweitung der Rechtssetzungsbefugnisse der Europäischen Gemeinschaften durch den Europäischen Gerichtshof, Thesis München 1974, 225 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jean Boulouis, A propos de la fonction normative de la jurisprudence. Remarques sur l’oeuvre jurisprudentielle de la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes, Mélanges Waline 1974, Vol. I, pp. 149–162.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schwarze (op. cit., note 12), pp. 105-240.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Albert Bleckmann, Der Rechtsstaat in vergleichender Sicht. Zugleich ein Beitrag zur Rechtsquellenlehre des Europäischen Gemeinschaftsrechts, 20 GYIL (1977), pp. 406–432.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neville Brown and Jacobs (op. cit., note 17), pp. 215-228.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Toth (op. cit., note 10), pp. 85-94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Anna Bredimas, Comparative Law in the Court of Justice of the European Communities, 32 YbWA (1978), pp. 320–333.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See e.g. Pierre Pescatorein 4 CDE (1968), pp. 629–673, in CML Rev 1972, pp. 73-79 and in his report for FIDE 1975 (Brussels).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E.A. Alkema, West-Europa en de rechten van de Mens, Civis Mundi 1974, in particular pp. 115-118.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ernst-Werner Fuss, Der Grundrechtsschutz in den Europäischen Gemeinschaften aus deutscher Sicht, UGA Verlag 1975, PP. 67-89.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.G. Toth, The Individual and European Law. 24 ICLO (1975), in particular pp.664–668.

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. R. Edison and F. Wooldridge, European Community Law and Fundamental Human Rights: some recent decisions of the European Court and of national courts, LIEI 1976/1, pp. 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ch. Philip, La Cour de Justice des Communautés et la protection des droits fondamentaux dans l’ordre juridique communautaire, 21 AFDI (1975), pp. 383–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Hilf, The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the Community in F.G. Jacobs (ed.) European Law and the Individual, North Holland 1976, pp. 145-160.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pierre Pescatore, Bestand und Bedeutung der Grundrechte im Recht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, 14 EuR (1979), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See e.g. Court of Justice in Stork Case (1/58), 4 Feb. 1959, [1959] ECR 26.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 5 Jur. (1959) 66.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 5 Rec. (1959) 63.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Second Ruhrkohlen Case (36-38 and 40/59), 15 July 1960 [1960] ECR 438.

    Google Scholar 

  27. 6 Jur. (1960) 920.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 6 Rec. (1960) 890, see quotation above, § 46.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bundesverfassungsgericht, 5 July 1967, 18 Oct. 1967, 9 June 1971 and 29 May 1974 all summarized in L.J. Brinkhorst and H.G. Schermers, Judicial Remedies in the European Communities, 2nd ed. Kluwer Deventer 1977, pp. 181–191.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. See also Peter Hay, Supremacy of Community Law in National Courts, A Progress Report on Referrals Under the EEC Treaty. 16 AJCL (1969) p. 524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bodo Börner, Deutsche Grundrechte und Gemeinschaftsrecht, NJW 1976, pp. 2041-2-48.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Joint Declaration of 5 April 1977, O.J 27 April 1977, No C 103/1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. See also John Forman, The Joint Declaration on Fundamental Rights, 2 ELRev (1977), pp. 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Frais Case (130/75), 27 Oct. 1976, considerations 10, 16, 19, [1976] ECR 1598, 1599; [1976] 2 CMLR 722, 723, 724.

    Google Scholar 

  35. See also Trevor Hartley, Religious freedom and equality of opportunity, 2 ELRev (1977), pp. 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See e.g. First Gervais-Danone Case (77/71), 15 Dec. 1971, consideration 8, [1971] ECR 1137; [1973] CMLR 427; CCH para 8125; on retroactivity see also Mann (op. cit., note 38) pp. 493-499.

    Google Scholar 

  37. M. Letemendia, La rétroactivité en droit communautaire, comparaison avec le droit anglais, 13 CDE (1977), pp. 518–570.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Advocate-General Warner’s opinion in the IRC A Case (7/76), 7 July 1976, [1976] ECR 1235-1239.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See B. Sundberg-Weitman, Discrimination on grounds of nationality, North Holland 1977, 247 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Hervé Cassan, Le principe de non-discrimination dans le domaine social à travers la jurisprudence récente de la Cour de Justice des Communautés européennes, 12 RTDE (1976), pp. 259–270.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Clive M. Schmitthoff, The Doctrines of Proportionality and Non-Discrimination, 2 ELRev. (1977), pp. 332, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lord MacKenzie Stuart, The Court of Justice of the European Communities and the control of executive discretion, 13 Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law (1974), pp. 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Christian Tomuschat, Le principe de proportionnalité: Quis iudi-cabit? 13 CDE (1977), pp. 97–102.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Schmitthoff (op. cit., note 155), pp. 332, 333.

    Google Scholar 

  45. See also J. Mertens de Wilmars, La jurisprudence de la Cour de justice comme instrument de l’intégration communautaire, 12 CDE (1976), pp. 135–148.

    Google Scholar 

  46. See Walter van Gerven, The Recent Case Law of the Court of Justice concerning Articles 30 and 36 of the EEC Treaty, 14 CMLRev (1977), pp. 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Da Costa Case (23-30/62) 27 March 1963, [1963] ECR 37-39; 9 Jur. (1963) 77-79; 9 Rec. (1963) CMLR 237, 238; CCH para 8010 (pp. 7238-7239).

    Google Scholar 

  48. See below § 596: See also Peter Hay, Res Judicata and Precedent in the Court of Justice of the Common Market, 12 AJCL (1963), pp. 404–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Albert Bleckmann, Die Position des Völkerrechts im inneren Rechtsraum der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Monimus oder Dualismus der Rechtsordnungen, 18 Jahrbuch (1975), pp. 300–319.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Karl M. Meessen, The Application of Rules of Public International Law within Community Law, 13 CMLRev (1976), pp. 485–501.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Robert Kovar, La Contribution de la Cour de justice au développement de la condition internationale de la Communauté européenne, 14 CDE (1978), pp. 527–573.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jean Paul Pietri, La valeur juridique des accords liant la Communauté économique européenne, 12 RTDE (1976), pp. 51–75, 194-214.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Hans Krück, Völkerrechtliche Verträge im Recht der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Springer Verlag 1977, 210 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  54. See Theo Öhlinger, Rechtsfragen des Freihandelsabkommens zwischen Österreich und der EWG, 34 Zaörv (1974), p. 659.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Detlef Schumacher, Die Berücksichtigung nationalen Rechts durch Organe der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, NJW 1970, pp. 980-984.

    Google Scholar 

  56. John A. Usher, The Influence of National Concepts on Decisions of the European Court, 1 ELRev. (1976), pp. 359–374.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Sixth Rewe Case (33/76), 16 Dec. 1976, consideration 5, [1976] ECR 1997, 1998; [1977] 1 CMLR 550; CCH para 8382; Comet Case (45/76), 16 Dec. 1976, considerations 12-17, [1976] ECR 2053; [1977] 1 CMLR 553; CCH para 8383.

    Google Scholar 

  58. See also Robert Kovar, Droit communautaire et droit procedural national, 13 CDE (1977), pp. 230–244.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Derrick Wyatt, National periods of limitation as a bar to Community rights, 2 ELRev. (1977), pp. 122–125.

    Google Scholar 

  60. See Hans G. Rupp, Judicial Review of International Agreements: Federal Republic of Germany, 25 AJCL (1977), pp. 286–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. See also J.P. Warner, The Relationship between European Community Law and the National Laws of Member States, 93 LQR (1977), pp. 349–366.

    Google Scholar 

  62. G.M. Borchardt, Structures d’accueil, Beschouwingen over de verhouding nationaal recht — gemeenschapsrecht in de zes oude Lid-Staten van de Europese Gemeenschappen, No. 3/78 Studentenscripties, Asser Instituut, the Hague 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dominique Carreau, Droit communautaire et droits nationaux; concurrence ou primauté? 14 RTDE (1978). pp. 381–418.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Pigs Marketing Case (83/78), 29 Nov. 1978, consideration 69, [1979] 1 CMLR 204. On the question of priority see also Peter Hay and Vicki Thomson, The Community Court and Supremacy of Community Law: a progress report, 8 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law (1975), pp. 651–670.

    Google Scholar 

  65. See also Gerhard Bebr, How supreme is Community law in the national courts. 11 CMLRev (1974), pp. 3–37.

    Google Scholar 

  66. See Eric E. Bergsten, Community Law in the French Courts, Nijhoff, The Hague 1973.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  67. Manfred Simon, Enforcement by French Courts of European Community Law, The Law Quarterly Review 1974, pp. 467-485 and the national reports to the Sixth Congress of FIDE, Luxembourg 24-26 May 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  68. For a survey of literature, see Manfred Zuleeg, Neuere Literatur zum Europarecht: Die Europäischen Gemeinschaften und nationales Verfassungsrecht, 102 Aör (1977), pp. 298–316.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Grundgesetz, Art. 93(1) No. 4a. See Fuss (op. cit., note 82), p. 65. See also Jürgen Jekewitz, Verfassungsbeschwerden wegen Verstoßes auch gegen Gemeinschaftsrecht? 13 EuR (1978), pp. 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  70. See W. van Gerven, Contribution de l’arrêt Defrenne au dévelopment du droit communautaire, 13 CDE (1977), pp. 138–143.

    Google Scholar 

  71. A.J. Easson, Can directives impose obligations on individuals? 4 ELRev. (1979) pp. 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  72. See Henry G. Schermers, Indirecte obligations, Four questions in respect of EEC obligations arising from rights or obligations of others, 24 NTIR (1977), pp. 260–273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Leiden, The Netherlands

    Henry G. Schermers (Professor of Law)

Authors
  1. Henry G. Schermers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1979 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schermers, H.G. (1979). The Community legal order. In: Judicial Protection in the European Communities. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6098-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6098-6_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-268-1096-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6098-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation