Skip to main content

Derivations and Applications

  • Chapter
The Ingenious Mind of Nature
  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter draws on the material developed in the first three chapters and, in part, recasts it into a semiformal set of axioms and theorems, beginning with another look at the causality issue because it is so central to the physiogenetic model. This is followed by three sections on assumptions, axioms, and a transitional axiom, the last dealing with the problem of starting at or above the level of an atom. The theorems come next, divided into two sections: primary and secondary theorems. Secondary theorems are more descriptive than derivative. The concluding sections extend the physiogenetic model to abstract and sociological systems (in part, figuratively), present a graph showing relationships among systems that can and cannot reverse entropy, preview how the book applies the model to representative systems, and offer a summary view on the potential utility of the model.

The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible.

—Albert Einstein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Although Walter Heisenberg developed the uncertainty principle,his subsequent 1932 Nobel prize cited it as the indeterminacy principle.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Niels Bohr balked until Heisenberg anchored the uncertainty principle to his own complementarity idea. See Rhodes, pp. 130–132.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Max Planck also balked at the idea of no causality, despite the determinacy-versus-indeterminacy issue. See Max Planck, Scientific Autobiography and Other Papers, Great Books of the Western World, 2nd ed., vol. 56, pp. 102–103.

    Google Scholar 

  4. James R. Newman, book review of David Bohm’s Causality and Chance in Modern Physics, Scientific American, January 1958, pp. 111–112.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Leon Lederman [interview with D. Teresi],“ Modern Maturity, June 1994, pp. 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Webster’s Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary (Springfield, Massachusetts: Merriam-Webster Inc., 1990), p. 1235.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations, 3rd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979), p. 150.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Personal letter from David B. Guralnick, May 18, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David B. Guralnick, ed., Webster’s New World Dictionary of the American Language ( New York: The World Publishing Company, 1972 ), p. 481.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scientists look into the next century,“ Financial Times, September 14/15, 1996, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 George M. Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, G.M. (1997). Derivations and Applications. In: The Ingenious Mind of Nature. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6020-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6020-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45571-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6020-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics