Skip to main content

International Relations and War

  • Chapter
Book cover The Ingenious Mind of Nature
  • 109 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the relationships among nations. In the absence of an effective supranational power, and given the frequent appetite for aggrandizement of neighbors, arguably the most prominent theme in modern history has been the attempt to maintain an international balance of power. Technically, then, every nation comprises a system in itself existing in the larger system of the geopolitical world. Though that larger system exerts little direct control over its elemental nations, some kind of equilibrium is necessary, typically through balance-of-power treaties. To be sure, these treaties often fail to prevent war and its ensuing chaos, but it is equally true that once war breaks out, the nations affected usually join forces to bring that war to an end and restore a balance of power.

Nations are changed by time; they flourish and decay; by turns command and obey.

Ovid

Concentration is the secret of strength in politics, in war, in trade, in short in the management of all human affairs.

Emerson

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (New York: Random House, 1987), pp. 86–89.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hans Morgenthau, “Alliances and National Security,” Perspectives in Defense Management, Autumn 1973, p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alfred T. Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660–1783 (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1890), pp. 28–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frederick H. Hartmann, The Relations of Nations, 6th ed. (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1983), pp. 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Maurice Matloff, “The 90-Division Gamble,” in Kent Greenfield, ed., Command Decisions (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1959), pp. 365–382.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For example, see Desmond Flower and James Reeves, eds., The Taste of Courage (New York: Harper & Row, 1960), pp. 705–778.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations, p. 397. The actual statement was: “We have no eternal allies and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and these interests it is our duty to follow” (Parliament, March 1, 1848).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. de Montesquieu,The Spirit of Laws, Great Books of the Western World, vol. 37, p. 60 [2nd ed., 1990, vol. 35].

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy, pp. 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  10. The ratio varies with terrain and other circumstances, but 3:1 is generally regarded as a minimum by the military profession because the attacker is much more vulnerable to fire than are defenders.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alan S. Milward, Economy and Society,1939–1945 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979), p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bartlett’s Familiar Quotations p. 438.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Downs, pp. 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  14. This categorization of threats was derived from Donald E. Neu-chterlein, “National Interest and Foreign Policy,” Foreign Service Journal, vol. 54, July 1977, pp. 6–8, 27.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Winston S. Churchill,Memoirs of the Second World War (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1959), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Captain King did this while commanding the aircraft carrier Lexington (1932). In the second instance (1938), Rear Admiral King was in command of a carrier task force. Apparently the Japanese studied the results more thoroughly than did U.S. observers.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Churchill, Memoirs of the Second World War, p. 12. He said he wrote his memoirs “to show how easily the tragedy of the Second World War could have been prevented.”

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barbara Tuchman,The Guns of August (New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1962), pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clausewitz, On War, pp. 105, 139.

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. H. Liddell Hart, Strategy, 2nd ed. (New York: Praeger, 1967), p. 372.

    Google Scholar 

  21. The annualNational Travel Report is a widely used source because most terrorist crimes are inflicted on victims in transit. The annual total rarely exceeds 2000. Another valid source is the annual State Department report of the subject, which for the year 1993 indicated that worldwide terrorist attacks resulted in 109 deaths and 1393 nonfatal injuries.

    Google Scholar 

  22. David Dickson, “Concern grows over China’s plans to reduce number of inferior births,” Nature, January 6, 1994, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 George M. Hall

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hall, G.M. (1997). International Relations and War. In: The Ingenious Mind of Nature. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6020-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6020-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45571-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-6020-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics