Abstract
When preparing a qualitative research proposal, researchers often find themselves in a paradoxical situation. Researchers have deliberately selected a qualitative method because little is known about the area — yet how can they write about, for instance how they are going to analyse data when the nature of these data are not known? How can a qualitative researcher convince a funding agency that a study is worthwhile when so much is unknown? Whereas quantitative research proposals are generally highly structured and serve to guide the research process, it is not possible to develop a rigid protocol for a qualitative research proposal while still remaining true to the principles of qualitative inquiry. While the quantitative proposal may serve as an indicator that the student is ready to collect data, has identified a theoretical framework and has a sound protocol for data analysis, the qualitative proposal serves only to convince the committee that the topic is worth studying. Despite the fact that the qualitative researcher may not know very much about the research topic or what will be found out, she or he must entice the committee in order to be allowed to proceed. This lack of development may be a handicap if the qualitative proposal is to be submitted to a funding agency, and the onus is on the researcher to convince the granting agency that funding the research is ‘a good risk.’
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agar, M.H. (1980) The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography, Academic Press, New York.
Cohen, M.Z., Knafl, K. and Dzurec, L.C. (1993) Grant writing for qualitative research. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25, 151–6.
Estroff, S.E. and Churchill, L.R. (1984) Comment I (ethical dilemmas). Anthropology Newsletter, 25(7), 15.
Glaser, B.G. (1978) Theoretical Sensitivity, The Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.
Van Gennep, A. (1967/92) The research topic: or, folklore without end, in Qualitative Health Research, (ed. J.M. Morse), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 65–8.
Further Reading
Marshall, C. and Rossman, G.B. (1989) Designing Qualitative Research, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Morse, J.M. (1991) On the evaluation of qualitative proposals [editorial]. Qualitative Health Research, 1(2), 147–51.
Morse, J.M. (1993) Designing funded qualitative research, in Handbook of Qualitative Methods, (eds N. Denzin and Y. Lincoln), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 220–35.
Sandelowski, M., Davis, D.H. and Harris, B.G. (1989) Artful design: writing the proposal for research in the naturalist paradigm. Research in Nursing and Health, 12, 77–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Janice M. Morse and Peggy Anne Field
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morse, J.M., Field, P.A. (1996). Principles of conceptualizing a qualitative project. In: Nursing Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4471-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4471-9_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-60510-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-4471-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive