Abstract
Wastage is an emotive term. In the dictionary the meaning of waste is peppered with pejorative terms such as: unproductive, desolate, useless expenditure (Chambers 1988). On the whole it is regarded as a negative word. To waste is quite simply a bad thing. Having considered how emotionally loaded is the meaning of the word, one has to ask why it is generally used instead of the less emotive term ‘turnover’, particularly with regard to the service sector. Rarely do you hear talk of the wastage rates of factory workers in industry where the notion of ‘turnover’ is routinely used. So, in contrast to the emotively charged term of ‘wastage’, turnover is defined as ‘the number of employees starting or finishing employment at a particular place of work over a given period’. Turnover is a clean, clear definition of a situation. So, while ‘turnover’ is essentially factual in thrust, ‘wastage’ is a judgemental term, incorporating ideas of uselessness, loss and unprofitability. Just as the poet, William Wordsworth (1807), spoke of echoes — ‘Like — but oh, how different’ — so being part of the turnover of the NHS has different connotations to being part of the wastage of the NHS. From a nurse’s standpoint it is important to see the difference. Indeed, our aim here is to try to understand the nurses’ point of view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
In fact, the historian, Thomas Carlyle, went further — ‘Language is called the garment of thought: however, it should rather be, language is the flesh-garment, the body, of thought’ (Sartor Resartus, i, 11).
This health authority has consistently wished to remain anonymous in all subsequent research publications.
In fact, this exercise was not so easy as this brief sentence suggests and the outcome for a number could not be traced (see also, Barry et al. 1989).
Recognizing that the ‘leavers’ maybe giving a somewhat distorted picture, we interviewed nine nurses who had altered their original intention of leaving the health authority and were still in post at the end of the three-year follow-up period. We were interested in what had persuaded them to change their mind about leaving.
References
Barry, J. T., Soothill, K. L. and Francis, B. J. 1989. Nursing the statistics: a demonstration study of nurse turnover and retention. Journal of Advanced Nursing 14: 528–35.
Chambers. 1988. English Dictionary. Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers.
Conroy, M. and Stidson, M. 1988. 2001 — The Black Hole. The NHS Regional Manpower Planners’ Group.
Friend, B. 1990. Training for the dole. Nursing Times, 7 February, 86(6).
Grocott, T. 1989. A hole in the black hole theory. Nursing Times, 11 October, 85(41).
Hockey, J. 1987. A picture of pressure. Nursing Times, 8 July, 83(27).
Mackay, L. 1988a. Career woman. Nursing Times 84(10).
Mackay, L. 1988b. No time to care. Nursing Times 84(11).
Mackay, L. 1989. Nursing a Problem. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Martin, J. P, and Mackean, J. 1988. Can We Keep Nurses in the Health Service? A Study of Nurse Retention in Two Health Districts. Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of Southampton.
Price Waterhouse. 1988. Nurse Retention and Recruitment: A Matter of Priority. Report commissioned by chairmen of Regional Health Authorities in England, Health Boards in Scotland and Health Authorities in Wales.
Review Body for Nursing Staff, Midwives, Health Visitors and Professions Allied to Medicine. 1985. 2nd Report on Nursing Staff, Midwives and Health Visitors. Cm 9529. London: HMSO.
Soothill, K. L., Barry, J. T. and Williams, C. W. 1990. Words and Actions: A Study in Nurse Wastage. Working Paper No. 9, Lancaster University, Department of Applied Social Science.
Thompson, J. 1990. No vacancies. Nursing Times, 23 May, 86(21).
Waite, R., Buchan, J. and Thomas, J. 1989. Nurses in and out of Work. IMS Report No. 170, Brighton: Institute of Manpower Studies.
Williams, C. W., Soothill, K. L. and Barry, J. T. 1990a. Leaving — We’ve heard it all before. Working Paper No. 1, Lancaster University, Department of Applied Social Science.
Williams, C. W., Soothill, K. L. and Barry, J. T. 1990b. How Could the Health Authority Have Kept You? Working Paper No. 2, Lancaster University, Department of Applied Social Science.
Williams, C. W., Soothill, K. L. and Barry, J. T. 1990c. Mothering and Nursing — Conflicting Interests. Working Paper No. 3, Lancaster University, Department of Applied Social Science.
Williams, C. W., Soothill, K. L. and Barry, J. T. 1991a. Love nursing, hate the job. Health Service Journal, 14 February, 101(5238): 18–21.
Williams, C. W., Soothill, K. L. and Barry, J. T. 1991b. Targeting the discontented. Health Service Journal, 21 February, 101(5239): 20–21.
Williams, C. W., Soothill, K. L. and Barry, J. T. in press. Nursing — just a job? Do statistics tell us what we think? Journal of Advanced Nursing.
Wordsworth, W. 1807. Yes, it was the mountain Echo. Reprinted in The Poetical Works of Wordsworth, London: Oxford University Press, 1951.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Keith Soothill, Christine Henry and Kevin Kendrick
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, C., Soothill, K., Barry, J. (1992). Nursing wastage from the nurses’ perspective. In: Soothill, K., Henry, C., Kendrick, K. (eds) Themes and Perspectives in Nursing. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4435-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-4435-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-43990-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-4435-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive