Advertisement

Early Homo

How Many Species?
  • Bernard Wood
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

The problem of deciding when phenotypic variation exceeds that which can be tolerated within a single species is a familiar one to both paleontologists in general (Mayr et al., 1953; Sylvester-Bradley, 1956; Simpson, 1961) and to pal-eoanthropologists in particular (e.g., Weidenreich, 1946; Campbell, 1962; Zwell and Pilbeam, 1972; Wolpoff, 1978; Pilbeam, 1978). Some authors have regarded these taxonomic difficulties as intrinsic to the practice of equating fossil with neontological species and have proposed that any resolution lies in the direction of redefining the fossil species concept. For example, Cain (1954) and George (1956) used the terms paleospeaes and chronospeaes, respectively, to refer to the whole (George, 1956), or part (Pilbeam, 1972), of an evolutionary lineage. These devices thus incorporate the element of time within the definition of a paleon-tological species.

Keywords

Early Hominid Cranial Capacity Time Band Early Homo Enamel Thickness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, S. A. 1984. A Comparative Study of Tooth Root Morphology in the Great Apes, Modern Man and Early Hominids. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  2. Alexeev, V. P. 1986. The Origin of the Human Race. Progress Publishers, Moscow.Google Scholar
  3. Beynon, A. D., and Wood, B. A. 1986 Variations in enamel thickness and structure in East African hominids. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 70: 177–193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beynon, A. D., and Wood, B. A. 1987. Patterns and rates of enamel growth in the molar teeth of early hominids. Nature 326: 493–496.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilsborough, A. and Wood, B. A. 1988. Cranial morphometry of early hominids I. Facial region. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 76: 61–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boaz, N. T. and Howell, F. C. 1977. A gracile hominid cranium from Upper Member G of the Shungura Formation, Ethiopia. Am. J. Phys Anthropol. 46: 93–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brain, C. R., Churcher, C. S., Clark, J D., Gnne, F E, Shipman, P., Susman, R. L., Turner, A., and Watson, V. 1988. New evidence of early hominids, their culture and environment from the Swartkrans Cave, South Africa. S Afr.J. Sci. 84: 828–835.Google Scholar
  8. Caccone, A., and Powell, J. R. 1989. DNA divergence among hominoids. Evolution 43: 925–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cam, A. J. 1954. Animal Species and Their Evolution. London, Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  10. Cain, A. J., and Harrison, G. A. 1958. An analysis of the taxonomists’judgement of affinity. Proc. Zool Soc Lond 131: 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, B. 1962. The systematics of man. Nature 194: 225–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell, B. G. 1972 Conceptual progress in physical anthropology: fossil man. Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 1: 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chamberlain, A. T. 1987. A Taxonomic Review and Phylogenetic Analysis of Homo habilis. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Liverpool.Google Scholar
  14. Chamberlain, A. T. 1989. Variations within Homo habilis, in: G. Giacobini (ed.), Hominidae, pp. 175–181. Jaca Books, Milan.Google Scholar
  15. Clarke, R.J. 1977. A juvenile cranium and some adult teeth of early Homo from Swartkrans, Transvaal. S. Afr. J. Sci. 73: 46–49.Google Scholar
  16. Clarke, R. J. 1985. Australopithecus and early Homo in Southern Africa, in: E. Delson (ed.), Ancestors: The Hard Evidence, pp. 171–177. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Clarke, R. J., and Howell, F. C. 1972. Affinities of the Swartkrans 847 hominid cranium. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 37: 319–336.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conroy, G. C. (1991). Enamel thickness in South African australopithecines: non-invasive determination by computed tomography. Pal. Afncana 28: 53–59.Google Scholar
  19. Coppens, Y. 1980. The differences between Australopithecus and Homo, preliminary conclusions from the Omo Research Expedition’s studies, in: L.-K. Konigsson (ed.), Current Argument on Early Man, pp. 207–225. Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Cronin, J. E., Boaz, N. T., Stringer, C. B., and Rak, Y. 1981. Tempo and mode in hominid evolution. Nature 292: 113–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Heinzelin, J. (ed.) 1983. The Omo Group. Stratigraphie and related earth sciences studies in the Lower Omo Basin, Southern Ethiopia. Musee Royal de L’Afrique Central, Tervuren, Belgique. Annales, 8 Sciences Geologues, No. 85, pp. 1–365.Google Scholar
  22. Day, M. H. and Napier, J. R. 1964. Fossil foot bones. Nature 201: 969–970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Falk, D. 1983. Cerebral cortices of East African early hominids. Science 221: 1072–1074.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feibel, C. S., Brown, F. H., and McDougall, I. 1989. Stratigraphie context of fossil hominids from the Omo Group deposits: Northern Turkana Basin, Kenya and Ethiopia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 78: 595–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gans, D. J. 1984. The search for significance: different tests on the same data. J. Stat. Comput. Simulation 19: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. George, T. N. 1956. Biospecies, chronospecies and morphospecies, in: P C. Sylvester-Bradley (ed.), The Species Concept in Paleontology, pp. 123–137. The Systematics Association, London.Google Scholar
  27. Gingerich, P. D., and Schoeninger, M. J. 1979. Patterns of tooth size variability in the dentition of primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 51: 457–465.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution considered. Paleobiology 3: 115–151.Google Scholar
  29. Grine, F. E., and Martin, L B. 1988. Enamel thickness and development in Australopithecus and Paranthropus, in: F. E. Grine (ed.), Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecines, pp. 3–42. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Groves, C. P. 1989. A Theory of Human and Primate Evolution. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Groves, C. P., and Mazak, V. 1975. An approach to the taxonomy of the Hominidae: Gracile Villafranchian hominids of Africa. Cas. Miner. Geol. 20: 225–247.Google Scholar
  32. Hartman, S. E. 1988. A cladistic analysis of hominoid molars. J . Hum. Evol. 17: 489–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holloway, R. L. 1985. The past, present, and future significance of the lunate sulcus in early hominid evolution, in: P. V. Tobias (ed.), Hominid Evolution, pp. 47–62. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Howell, F. C. 1978. Hominidae, in: V. J. Maglio and H. B. S. Cooke (eds.), Evolution of African Mammals, pp. 154–248. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. Hughes, A. R., and Tobias, P. V. 1977. A fossil skull probably of the genus Homo from Sterkfontein, Transvaal. Nature 265: 310–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Johanson, D. C. 1989. A partial Homo habilis skeleton from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania: a summary of preliminary results, in: G. Giacobini (ed.), Hominidae: Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Human Paleontology, pp. 155–166. Jaca Book, Milan.Google Scholar
  37. Johanson, D. C., Masao, F. T., Eck, G. G., White, T. D., Walker, R. C., Kimbel, W. H., Asfaw, B., Manega, P., Ndessokia, P., and Suwa, G. 1987. New partial skeleton of Homo habilis from Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 327: 205–209.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kennedy, G. E. 1983. A morphometric and taxonomic assessment of a hominine femur from the Lower Member, Koobi Fora, Lake Turkana. Am. J Phys. Anthropol 61: 429–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kennedy, K. A. R. 1990. Narmada Man fossil skull from India: dating, morphology, taxonomy. Am. J Phys. Anthropol. 81: 248–249.Google Scholar
  40. Leakey, L. S. B. 1966. Homo habilis, Homo erectus and the australopithecines. Nature 209: 1279–1281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leakey, L. S. B., Tobias, P. V., and Napier, J. R. 1964. A new species of the genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature 202: 7–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leakey, M. D., Clarke, R. J., and Leakey, L. S. B. 1971. New hominid skull from Bed I, Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Nature 232: 308–312.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leakey, R. E. F. 1974. Further evidence of Lower Pleistocene hominids from East Rudolf, North Kenya, 1973. Nature 248: 653–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leakey, R. E. F., and Walker, A. 1980. On the status of Australopithecus afarensis. Science 207: 1103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leakey, R. E., Walker, A., Ward, C. V., and Grausz, H. M. 1989. A partial skeleton of a gracile hominid from the Upper Burgi Member of the Koobi Fora Formation, East Lake Turkana, Kenya. G. Giacobmi (ed.), Proc 2nd Int. Cong. Human Paleontology, pp. 167–173. Jaca Book, Milan.Google Scholar
  46. Lewis, O. J. 1989. Functional Morphology of the Evolving Hand and Foot. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Lieberman, D. E., Pilbeam, D. R., and Wood, B. A. 1988. A probabilistic approach to the problem of sexual dimorphism in Homo habilis. a comparison of KNM-ER 1470 and KNM-ER 1813. J Hum. Evol 17: 503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luboga, S. A. 1986. Morphometric Variation in the Cranial Base and Facial Skeleton of Higher Primates with Special Reference to Modern Humans. Ph.D. thesis, Makerere University.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, L. B. 1983. The Relationships of the Later Miocene Hominoidea. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  50. Martyn, J., and Tobias, P. V. 1967. Pleistocene deposits and new fossil localities in Kenya. Nature 215: 479–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mayr, E., Lmsley, E. G., and Usinger, R. L. 1953. Methods and Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw- Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Miller, J. A. 1991. Does brain size variability provide evidence of multiple species in Homo habilis? Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 84: 385–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miyamoto, M. M., Slightom, J. L., and Goodman, M. 1987. Phylogenetic relations of humans and African apes from DNA sequences in the un-globin gene. Science 238: 369–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miyamoto, M. M., Koop, B. F., Slightom, J. L., Goodman, M., and Tennant, M. R. 1988. Molecular systematics of higher primates: geneological relationships and classification. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 7627–7631.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. O’Higgins, P. 1989. A Morphometric Study of Cranial Shape in the Hominidea. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  56. O’Higgins, P., Moore, W J, Johnson, D. R., McAndrew, T J., and Flinn, R. M. 1989. Patterns of cranial sexual dimorphism in certain groups of extant hominoids. J. Zool. Lond. 222: 353–362.Google Scholar
  57. Olson, T R. 1978. Hominid phylogenetics and the existence of Homo in Member 1 of the Swartkrans Formation, South Africa, J Hum. Evol 7: 159–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oxnard, C. 1985. Hominids and hominoids, lineages and radiations, in: P. V. Tobias (ed.), Hominid Evolution- Past, Present and Future, pp. 271–278. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  59. Oxnard, C. E. 1987 Fossils, Teeth and Sex. New Perspectives on Human Evolution. University of Washington Press, Seattle.Google Scholar
  60. Oxnard, C. 1988. Fossils, teeth and sex: new perspectives in human evolution. Proc. Austr. Soc. Hum Biol. 1: 23–73.Google Scholar
  61. Pilbeam, D. R. 1969. Tertiary Pongidae of East Africa: evolutionary relationships and taxonomy. Bull Peabody Mus. Nat Hist. 31: 1–185.Google Scholar
  62. Pilbeam, D. 1972. The Ascent of Man. An Introduction to Human Evolution. Collier Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  63. Pilbeam, D. 1978. Recognizing specific diversity in heterogeneous fossil samples, in: C. Jolly (ed.), Early Hominids of Africa, pp. 505–515. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  64. Pilbeam, D. and Vaisnys, J. R. 1975. Hypothesis testing in paleoanthropology, in R. H. Tuttle (ed.), Paleoanthropology, Morphology and Paleoecology, pp. 3–13. Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  65. Robinson, J. T 1965. Homo ‘habilis’ and the australopithecines Nature 205: 121–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Schultz, B. B. 1985. Levene’s test for relative variation. Syst Zool. 34: 449–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sibley, C. G., and Ahlquist, J. E. 1984. The phylogeny of the hominoid primates, as indicated by DNA-DNA hybridization. J . Mol Evol. 20: 2–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sibley, C. G., and Ahlquist, J. E. 1987. DNA hybridization evidence of hominoid phylogeny: Results from an expanded dataset. J. Mol Evol 26: 99–121.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Sokal, R. R., and Braumann, C. A. 1980. Significance tests for coefficients of variation and variability profiles. Syst. Zool. 29: 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stringer, C. B. 1986. The credibility of Homo habilis, in: B. Wood, L. Martin, and P. Andrews (eds.), Major Topics in Primate and Human Evolution, pp. 266–294.. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  72. Stringer, C. B. 1987. A numerical cladistic analysis for the genus Homo. J. Hum. Evol. 16: 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sylvester- Bradley, P. C. (ed.) 1956. The Species Concept in Palaeontology. The Systematics Association, London.Google Scholar
  74. Tobias, P. V. 1966. Fossil hominid remains from Ubeidiya, Israel. Nature 211: 130–133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Tobias, P. V. 1972. “Dished faces,” brain size and early hominids. Nature 239: 468–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tobias, P. V. 1980a. The natural history of the helicoïdal occlusal plane and its evolution in early Homo. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 53: 173–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tobias, P. V. 1980b. A survey and synthesis of the African hominids of the late Tertiary and early Quaternary periods, in: L.-K. Konigsson (ed.), Current Argument on Early Man, pp. 86–113, Pergamon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  78. Tobias, P. V. 1985. Single characters and the total morphological pattern redefined: the sorting effected by a selection of morphological features of the early hominids, in: E. Delson (ed.), Ancestors: The Hard Evidence, pp. 94–101. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  79. Tobias, P. V. 1987. The brain of Homo habilis: a new level of organization in cerebral evolution. J . Hum. Evol. 16: 741–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tobias, P. V. 1988. Numerous apparently synapomorphic features in Australopithecus robustus, Australopithecus boisei and Homo habilis. support for the Skelton-McHenry-Drawhorn hypothesis, in: F. E. Grine (ed.), Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecmes, pp. 293–308. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  81. Tobias, P. V. 1989. The status of Homo habilis in 1987 and some outstanding problems, in: G. Giacobini (ed.), Proc. 2nd Int. Congress of Human Paleontology, pp. 141–149. Jaca Book, Milan.Google Scholar
  82. Tobias, P. V. 1991. Olduvai Gorge, Volume IV. The Skulls, Endocasts and Teeth of Homo Habilis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  83. Tobias, P. V., and von Koenigswald, G. H. R. 1964. A comparison between the Olduvai hominids and those of Java and some implications for hominid phylogeny. Nature, 204: 515–518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Van Valen, L. 1978. The statistics of variation. Evol. Theor. 4: 33–43.Google Scholar
  85. Walker, A. 1976. Remains attributable to Australopithecus in the East Rudolf succession, in: Y. Cop-pens, F. Clark Howell, G. L. Isaac and R. E. Leakey (eds.), Earliest Man and Environments m the Lake Rudolf Basin, pp. 484–489. Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  86. Walker, A., and Leakey, R. E. F. 1978. The hominids of East Turkana. Sci. Am. 239(2): 44–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Weidenrich, F. 1946. Generic, specific and subspecific characters in human evolution. Am J. Phys. Anthropol. 4: 413–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wolpoff, M. H. 1969. Cranial capacity and taxonomy of Olduvai hominid 7. Nature 223: 182–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wolpoff, M. H. 1978. Analogies and interpretation in paleoanthropology, in: C.J. Jolly (ed.), Early Hominids of Africa, pp. 461–503. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  90. Wood, B. A. 1974. Olduvai Bed I post-cranial fossils: a reassessment.J. Hum. Evol. 3: 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Wood, B. A. 1975. An Analysis of Sexual Dimorphism in Primates. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  92. Wood, B. A. 1976. The nature and basis of sexual dimorphism in the primate skeleton. J . Zool. Lond. 180: 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wood, B. A. 1985. Early Homo in Kenya, and its systematic relationships, in: E. Delson (ed.), Ancestors: The Hard Evidence, pp. 206–214. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  94. Wood, B. A. 1987. Who is the ‘real’ Homo habilis? Nature 327: 187–188.Google Scholar
  95. Wood, B. A. 1988. Are “robust” australopithecines a monophyletic group?, in: F. Grine (ed.), Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecines, pp. 269–284. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  96. Wood, B. A. 1991a. A palaeontological model for determining the limits of early hominid taxonomic variability. Palaeont. Afr. 28: 69–75.Google Scholar
  97. Wood, B. A. 1991b. Koobi Fora Research Project Volume 4 Hominid Cranial Remains. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  98. Wood, B. A., Abbott, S. A. 1983. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. I: Mandibular molars: crown area measurements and morphological traits.J. Anat. 136: 197–219.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Wood, B. A., and Uytterschaut, H. 1987. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. III. Mandibular premolar crowns. Anat. 154: 121–156.Google Scholar
  100. Wood, B. A., and Xu, Q. 1991. Variation in the Lufeng dental remains. J . Hum. Evol. 20: 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Wood, B. A., and Abbott, S. A., and Graham, S. H. 1983. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. II: Mandibular molars—study of cusp areas, fissure pattern and cross-sectional shape of the crown.J. Anat. 137: 287–314.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Wood, B. A., and Wilson, G. B. 1986. Patterns of ailometry in modern human femora, in: R. Singer and J. K. Lundy (eds.), Variation, Culture and Evolution in African Populations, pp. 101–108. Witwatersrand University Press, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
  103. Wood, B. A., Abbott, S. A., and Uytterschaut, H. 1988. Analysis of the dental morphology of Plio-Pleistocene hominids. IV: Mandibular postcanine tooth morphology. J . Anat. 156: 107–139.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Wood, B A., Yu, L., and Willoughby, C. 1991. Intraspecific variation and sexual dimorphism in cranial and dental variables among higher primates and their bearing on the hominids fossil record. J . Anat 174: 185–205.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  105. Zwell, M., and Pilbeam, D. R. 1972. The single species hypothesis, sexual dimorphism, and variability in early hominids. Yb. Phys. Anthropol 16: 69–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernard Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.Hominid Palaeontology Research Group, Department of Human Anatomy and Cell BiologyUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolEngland

Personalised recommendations