Advertisement

Species Concepts and Species Recognition in Eocene Primates

  • Kenneth D. Rose
  • Thomas M. Bown
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

The problem of how to apply the species concept to fossils is not new (see, e.g., Trueman, 1924; Simpson, 1943, 1951; Sylvester-Bradley, 1956; Imbrie, 1957), nor has it been resolved. Despite heated debate and voluminous literature on the subject, a consensus seems more elusive today than several decades ago. Part of the reason for this discord may be the varied approaches, philosophies, and perspectives—some of which have led to new views on the nature of species—of participants in the debate, as well as different systematic objectives and questions being asked. Theoreticians, historians, and philosophers of science have joined paleontologists and neontologists in contributing to the debate. As will be seen, theoretical arguments often conflict with more operational approaches offered by paleontologists working with real specimens.

Keywords

Fossil Record Species Concept Species Recognition Evolutionary Species Biological Species Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashlock, P. D. 1979. An evolutionary systematist’s view of classification. Syst. Zool. 28:441–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard, K. C. 1988. New notharctine primate fossils from the Early Eocene of New Mexico and southern Wyoming and the phylogeny of Notharctinae. Am J. Phys. Anthrop. 75:439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bock, W. J. 1979. The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change—a reductionistic approach. Bull. Carnegie Mus Nat. Hist. 13:20–69.Google Scholar
  4. Bolli, H. M. 1986. Evolutionary trends in planktic Forammifera from Early Cretaceous to Recent, with special emphasis on selected Tertiary lineages. Bull. Cent. Rech. Explor.-Prod Elf-Aquitaine 10:565–577.Google Scholar
  5. Bonde, N. 1981. Problems of species concepts in palaeontology. Inter. Symp. Concpt. Meth. Paleo. Barcelona, 198 7:19–34.Google Scholar
  6. Bookstein, F. L., Gingerich, P. D., and Kluge, A. G. 1978. Hierarchical linear modeling of the tempo and mode of evolution. Paleobiology 4:120–134.Google Scholar
  7. Bown, T. M., and Kraus, M J 1981 Lower Eocene alluvial paleosols (Willwood Formation, northwest Wyoming, U.S.A.) and their significance for paleoecology, paleoclimatology, and basin analysis. Palaeogeog., Palaeochm., Palaeoecol 34:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bown, T. M., and Kraus, M.J. 1987. Integration of channel and floodplain suites, I. Developmental sequence and lateral relations of alluvial paleosols. J . Sed. Pet. 57:587–601.Google Scholar
  9. Bown, T. M., and Rose, K. D. 1987. Patterns of dental evolution in early Eocene anaptomorphine primates (Omomyidae) from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Paleont. Soc. Mem. 23 (J. Paleont. 61, suppl. to no. 5): 1 – 162.Google Scholar
  10. Bown, T. M., and Rose, K D. 1991. Evolutionary relationships of a new genus and three new species of omomyid primates (Willwood Formation, lower Eocene, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming). J. Hum. Evol. 20:465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bown, T. M., Rose, K. D., Wing, S. L., and Simons, E. L. 1992. Distribution and stratigraphic correlation of fossil mammal and plant localities in the upper Paleocene-lower Eocene Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations, southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. U.S. Geol Surv. Prof. Paper, (in press).Google Scholar
  12. Carroll, R. L. 1988. Vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Chaline, J. 1983. Les rôles respectifs de la speciation quantique et diachronique dans la radiation des arvicolidés (Arvicolidae, Rodentia), conséquences au niveau des concepts. Colloques lut C.N R.S. 330:83–89.Google Scholar
  14. Chaline, J., and Laurin, B. 1986. Phyletic gradualism in a European Plio-Pleistocene Mimomys lineage (Arvicolidae, Rodentia). Paleobiology 12:203–216.Google Scholar
  15. Chandler, C. R., and Gromko, M. H. 1989. On the relationship between species concepts and speciation processes. Syst. Zool. 38:116–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cracraft, J. 1983. Species concepts and speciation analysis. Cwrr Ornithol. 1:159–187.Google Scholar
  17. Cracraft, J. 1987. Species concepts and the ontology of evolution. Biol. Philos. 2:329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Crusafont-Pairo, M., and Reguant, S. 1970. The nomenclature of intermediate forms. Syst. Zool 19:254–257.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dagosto, M. 1988. Implications of postcranial evidence for the origin of euprimates. J Hum. Evol. 17:35–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Queiroz, K., and Donoghue, M. J. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4:317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1990. Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: Phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Syst. Zool. 39:307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dobzhansky, T. 1970. Genetics of the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Donoghue, M. J. 1985. A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. Bryologist 88:172–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Echelle, A. A. 1990. In defense of the phylogenetic species concept and the ontological status of hybridogenetic taxa. Herpetologica 46:109–113.Google Scholar
  25. Eldredge, N., and Cracraft, J. 1980. Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Eldredge, N., and Gould, S.J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, in: T. J. M. Schöpf (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, pp. 82–115. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  27. Enay, R. 1983. Speciation phylétique dans le genre d’ammonite téthysien Semiformiceras Spath, du Tithonique inférieur des chaines bétiques (Andalousie, Espagne). Colloques Int. C.N.R S. 330:115–123.Google Scholar
  28. Endler, J. A. 1989. Conceptual and other problems in speciation, in: D. Otte and J. A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences, pp. 625–648.Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  29. Ereshefsky, M. 1989. Where’s the species? Comments on the phylogenetic species concepts. Biol. Philos. 4:89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Forey, P. L. 1982. Neontological analysis versus palaeontological stories, in: K. A. Joysey and A. E. Friday (eds.), Problems of Phylogenetic Analysis, pp. 119–157. Systematics Association Special Volume, Vol. 21, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Fox, R. C. 1986. Species in paleontology. Geosci. Can. 13:73–84.Google Scholar
  32. Frost, D. R., and Hillis, D. M. 1990. Species in concept and practice: herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46:87–104.Google Scholar
  33. Gebo, D. L. 1988. Foot morphology and locomotor adaptation in Eocene primates. Folia Pnmatol 50:3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gingerich, P. D. 1974. Size variability of the teeth in living mammals and the diagnosis of closely related sympatric fossil species. J. Paleont. 48:895–503.Google Scholar
  35. Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Paleontology and phylogeny: patterns of evolution at the species level in early Tertiary mammals. Am. J. Sci. 276:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gingerich, P. D. 1979a. The stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction in vertebrate paleontology, in: J. Cracraft and N. Eldredge (eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology, pp. 41–77. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Gingerich, P. D. 1979b. Paleontology, phylogeny, and classification: an example from the mammalian fossil record. Syst. Zool. 28:451–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gingerich, P. D. 1980. Evolutionary patterns in early Cenozoic mammals. Ann Rev Earth Planet. Sci. 8:407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gingerich, P. D. 1983. Origin and evolution of species: evidence from the fossil record. Colloques Int. C.N.R.S. 330:125–130.Google Scholar
  40. Gingerich, P. D. 1985. Species in the fossil record: concepts, trends, and transitions. Paleobiology 11:27–41.Google Scholar
  41. Gingerich, P. D. 1987. Evolution and the fossil record: patterns, rates, and processes. Can J Zool. 65:1053–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gingerich, P. D., and Simons, E. L. 1977. Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of early Eocene Adapidae (Mammalia, Primates) in North America. Contre. Mus Paleont. Univ. Mich. 24:245–279.Google Scholar
  43. Godinot, M. 1985. Evolutionary implications of morphological changes in Palaeogene primates. Spec. Papers Palaeontol. 33:39–47.Google Scholar
  44. Gould, S.J. 1983. Dix-huit points au sujet des équilibres ponctués. Colloques Int. C.N.R.S. 330:39–41.Google Scholar
  45. Gould, S. J. 1988. Trends as changes in variance: a new slant on progress and directionality in evolution./. Paleont. 62:319–329.Google Scholar
  46. Harris, J. M., and White, T. D. 1979. Evolution of the Plio-Pleistocene African Suidae. Trans Am. Phil. Soc. 69(2): 1–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Harrisville-Wolfe, C. 1991. Phyletic gradualism in a sample of the Early Eocene adapid Cantius (Mammalia, Primates) from the Willwood Formation in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 12:89–90.Google Scholar
  48. Hecht, M. K. 1983. Microevolution, developmental processes, paleontology and the origin of vertebrate higher categories. Colloques Int. C.N.R.S. 330:289–294.Google Scholar
  49. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenese Systematics University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  50. Hulbert, R. C., Jr., and MacFadden, B.J. 1991. Morphological transformation and cladogenesis at the base of the adaptive radiation of Miocene hypsodont horses. Am. Mus. Novitates 3000:1–61.Google Scholar
  51. Hull, D. L. 1979. The limits of cladism. Syst. Zool 28:416–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Imbne, J. 1957. The species problem with fossil animals, in: E. Mayr (ed), The Species Problem, pp. 125–153. AAAS Publ. 50, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  53. Jackson, J. B. C., and Cheetham, A. H. 1990. Evolutionary significance of morphospecies: a test with cheilostome Bryozoa. Science 248:579–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Jaeger, J.-J. 1983. Équilibres ponctués et gradualisme phylétique. un faux débat? Colloques Int. C.N.R.S 330:145–153Google Scholar
  55. Jones, J. S. 1988. Gaps in fossil teeth- saltations or sampling errors? TREE 3:208–213.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Krishtalka, L., and Stucky, R. K. 1985. Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 7. Revision of Diacodexis (Mammalia, Artiodactyla). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 54:413–486.Google Scholar
  57. MacLeod, N. 1991. Punctuated anagenesis and the importance of stratigraphy to paleobiology. Paleobiology 17:167–188.Google Scholar
  58. Maglio, V. J. 1971. The nomenclature of intermediate forms: an opinion. Syst. Zool. 20:370–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Malmgren, B. A., and Kennett, 1981. Phyletic gradualism in a Late Cenozoic planktonic for- aminiferal lineage: DSDP Site 284, southwest Pacific. Paleobiology 7:230–240.Google Scholar
  60. Malmgren, B. A., Berggren, W. A., and Lohmann, G. P. 1984. Species formation through punctuated gradualism in planktonic Foraminifera. Science 225:317–319.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Martin, R. D. 1990. Primate Origins and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  62. Maynard Smith, J. 1981. Macroevolution. Nature 289:13–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Maynard Smith, J. 1987. Darwinism stays unpunctured. Nature 330:516.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  65. Mayr, E. 1969. Principles of Systematic Zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  66. Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought. Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  67. Mayr, E. 1988a. The why and how of species. Biol. Philos. 3:431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mayr, E. 1988b. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology Belknap Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  69. McKitrick, M. C., and Zink, R. M. 1988. Species concepts in ornithology. Condor 90:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mishler, B. D., and Donoghue, M.J. 1982. Species concepts: a case for pluralism. Syst. Zool. 31:491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Newell, N. D. 1956. Fossil populations, in: P. C. Sylvester-Bradley (ed.), The Species Concept in Palaeontology, pp. 63–82. Syst. Assoc. (London) Publ. 2.Google Scholar
  72. Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 21–29. Transvaal Museum Monograph no. 4, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  73. Prothero, D. R., and Lazarus, D. B. 1980. Planktonic microfossils and the recognition of ancestors. Syst. Zool. 29:119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Raup, D. M., and Stanley, S. M. 1978. Principles of Paleontology, 2nd ed. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.Google Scholar
  75. Reif, W.-E., and Brettreich, J. 1985. Definitions of evolutionary species: a discussion. N. Jb. Geol. Palaont. Mh., 7:421–426.Google Scholar
  76. Rhodes, F. H. T. 1956. The time factor in taxonomy, in: P. C. Sylvester-Bradley (ed.), The Species Concept in Palaeontology, pp. 33–52. Syst. Assoc. (London) Publ. 2.Google Scholar
  77. Ridley, M. 1989. The cladistic solution to the species problem. Biol. Philos 4.1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rieppel, O. 1986. Species are individuals. A review and critique of the argument. Evol. Biol 20:283–317.Google Scholar
  79. Rose, K. D. 1981. The Clarkforkian Land-Mammal Age and mammalian faunal composition across the Paleocene-Eocene boundary. Univ. Mich. Papers Paleont. 26:1–197.Google Scholar
  80. Rose, K. D., and Bown, T. M. 1984a. Gradual phyletic evolution at the generic level in early Eocene omomyid primates. Nature 309:250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rose, K. D., and Bown, T. M. 1984b. Early Eocene Pelycodus jarrovn (Primates: Adapidae) from Wyoming: phylogenetic and biostratigraphic implications. J . Paleont 58:1532–1535.Google Scholar
  82. Rose, K. D., and Bown, T. M. 1986. Gradual evolution and species discrimination in the fossil record. Contnb. Geol., Univ. Wyoming, Spec. Pap. 3:119–130.Google Scholar
  83. Schankler, D. M. 1980. Faunal zonation of the Willwood Formation in the central Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Univ. Mich. Papers Paleont. 24:99–114.Google Scholar
  84. Sheldon, P. R. 1987. Parallel gradualistic evolution of Ordovician trilobites. Nature 330:561–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Simpson, G. G. 1943. Criteria for genera, species, and subspecies in zoology and paleozoology. Ann. N.Y.Acad. Sci. 44:145–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Simpson, G. G. 1951. The species concept. Evolution 5:285–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Simpson, G. G. 1953. The Major Features of Evolution. Simon and Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  89. Smith, A. B., and Patterson, C. 1988. The influence of taxonomic method on the perception of patterns of evolution. Evol. Biol. 23:127–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stanley, S. M. 1982. Macroevolution and the fossil record. Evolution 36:460–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Stebbins, G. L. 1987. Species concepts: semantics and actual situations. Biol. Philos. 2:198–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Stucky, R. K., and Krishtalka, L. 1990. Revision of the Wind River faunas, early Eocene of central Wyoming. Part 10. Bunophorus (Mammalia, Artiodactyla). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 59:149–171.Google Scholar
  93. Sylvester-Bradley, P. C. (ed.) 1956. The Species Problem in Palaeontology. Syst. Assoc. (London) Publ. 2:1–145.Google Scholar
  94. Tattersall, I. 1986. Species recognition in human paleontology. J. Hum. Evol. 15:165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Templeton, A. R. 1989. The meaning of species and speciation: a genetic perspective, in: D. Otte and J. A. Endler (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences, pp. 3–27. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  96. Thomas, G. 1956. The species conflict—abstractions and their applicability, in: P. C. Sylvester-Bradley (ed.), The Species Concept in Palaeontology, pp. 17–31. Syst. Assoc. (London) Publ. 2.Google Scholar
  97. Tintant, H. 1983. Cent ans après Darwin, continuité ou discontinuité dans l’évolution. Colloques Int. C.N.R.S. 330:25–37.Google Scholar
  98. Tobias, P. V. 1969. Bigeneric nomina: a proposal for modification of the rules of nomenclature. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 31:103–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Tobias, P. V. 1985. Punctuational and phyletic evolution in the hominids, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation, pp. 131–141. Transvaal Museum Monograph no. 4, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  100. Trueman, A. E. 1924. The species concept in palaeontology. Geol. Mag. 61:355–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Van Valen, L. 1976. Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25:233–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Van Valen, L. 1978. Why not to be a cladist. Evol. Theory 3:285–299.Google Scholar
  103. Van Valen, L. 1988. Species, sets, and the derivative nature of philosophy. Biol. Philos. 3:49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Wei, K.-Y. 1987. Multivariate morphometric differentiation of chronospecies in the late Neogene planktonic foraminiferal lineage Globoconella. Marine Micropaleontol. 12:183–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wei, K.-Y., and Kennett, J. P. 1988. Phyletic gradualism and punctuated equilibrium in the late Neogene planktonic foraminiferal clade Globoconella. Paleobiology 14:345–363.Google Scholar
  106. Westergaard, B. 1989. A new species concept: cladospecies (and cladosubspecies). Pluralistic realism and biotaxonomy: A radical solution to classification exemplified by hominids, in: G. Giacobini (ed.), Homimdae, Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Human Paleontology, pp. 71–74. Jaca Book, Milan.Google Scholar
  107. Westoll, T. S. 1956. The nature of fossil species, in: P. C Sylvester-Bradley (ed.), The Species Concept in Palaeontology, pp. 53–62. Syst. Assoc. (London) Publ. 2.Google Scholar
  108. Wiley, E. O. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. Syst. Zool. 27:17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenehcs John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  110. Wing, S. L., Bown, T. M., and Obradovich, J. D. 1991. Early Eocene biotic and climatic change in interior western North America. Geology 19:1189–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth D. Rose
    • 1
  • Thomas M. Bown
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Cell Biology and AnatomyThe Johns Hopkins University School of MedicineBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Branch of Paleontology and StratigraphyU.S. Geological SurveyDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations