Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Primatology ((AIPR))

Abstract

Each generation, evolutionary biologists seem doomed to grapple with the “species question” epitomized in my title. The task is often seen as Sisyphean, with no final consensus on what really constitutes a “species” ever emerging. In contrast, I believe that important strides in understanding what species may or may not be have been taken in the last 50 years, including much important work underway at the present. In particular, we have hope, if not for consensus, at least for a detailed understanding of why consensus on the nature of species has persistently eluded evolutionary biologists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bock, W. J., 1979. The synthetic explanation of macroevolutionary change—a reductionist approach, in: J. H. Schwartz and H. B. Rollins (eds.), Models and Methodologies in Evolutionary Theory Bull. Carnegie Mus. Nat Hist 13:20–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W. J. 1986. Species concepts, speciation and macroevolution, in: K Iwatsuki, P. H. Raven, and W. J. Bock (eds.), Modern Aspects of Species, pp. 31–57. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Brace, C. L. 1991. The Stages of Human Evolution Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon, C. S. 1962. The Origin of Races. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1987. Species concepts and the ontology of evolution. Biol. Phil 2:329–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J. 1989. Speciation and its ontology, in D. Otte and J. A Endler (eds.), Speciation and its Consequences, pp. 28–59. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M. J. 1988. Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem Cladistics 4:317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K. and Donoghue, M.J. 1990. Phylogenetic systematics and species revisited Cladistics 6:83–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1935. A critique of the species concept in biology. Phil Sci 2:344–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Reprint ed., 1982. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1971. The allopatric model and phylogeny in Paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution 25:156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1985a. Unfinished Synthesis. Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1985b. Time Frames Simon and Schuster, New York Reprint ed., 1989, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. 1989. Macroevolutionary Dynamics McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and S.J. Gould. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism, in: T. J. M. Schöpf (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, pp. 82–115. Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Salthe, S. N. 1984. Hierarchy and evolution Oxford Surv Evol. Biol 1:182–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T. 1974. A radical solution to the species problem Syst. Zool. 23:536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D. 1974. Stratigraphic record of Early Eocene Hyopsodus and the geometry of mammalian phylogeny. Nature 248:107–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Paleontology and phylogeny: patterns of evolution at the species level in Early Tertiary mammals. Am. J. Sci 276:1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P. D. 1979. The stratophenetic approach to phylogeny reconstruction in vertebrate paleontology, in: J. Cracraft and N. Eldredge (eds.), Phylogenetic Analysis and Paleontology, pp 41–77. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977 Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1976. Are species really individuals? Syst Zool 25:174–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1978. A matter of individuality. Phil. Sci. 45:335–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L. 1980. Individuality and selection. Ann Rev. Ecol Syst. 11:311–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, B. S. 1992. An extension of the SMRS into a phylogenetic context. Evolutionary Theory (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species Reprint ed., 1982. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1980. Biographical essays. G. G Simpson, in: E. Mayr and W B. Provine (eds), The Evolutionary Synthesis, pp. 452–463. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. 1982. The Growth of Biological Thought Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B. D. and Brandon, R. N. 1987. Individuality, pluralism, and the phylogenetic species concept. Biol Phil. 2:397–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B. D. and Donoghue, M J. 1982 Species concepts: a case for pluralism System. Zool 31:491–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G.J. 1970. Outline of a theory of comparative biology. Syst Zool 19:373–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G.J. and Platnick, N. I. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography Cladistics and Vicariance. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, K. C. and Wheeler, Q. D. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6:211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H. 1978. More evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S. Afr J. Sci. 74:369–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H. 1980. A comment on “mate recognition systems.” Evolution 34:330–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H. 1985. The recognition concept of species, in: E. S. Vrba (ed.), Species and Speciation. Transvaal Mus. Monogr. 4:21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, B. M., Hecht, K. and Eldredge, N. 1972. Phylogeny and paleontology. Evol. Biol. 6:31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1951. The species concept. Evolution 5:285–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G. 1963. The meaning of taxonomic statements, in: S. L. Washburn (ed.), Classification and Human Evolution, pp. 1–31. Aldine, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Crovello, T. J. 1970. The biological species concept: a critical evaluation. Am Naturalist 104:127–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E. S. 1980. Evolution, species and fossils: How does life evolve?. S. Afr. J. Sci 76:61–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, Q. D. and Nixon, K. C. 1990. Another way of looking at the species problem: a reply to de Queiroz and Donoghue. Cladtstics 6:77–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W. 1837. History of the Inductive Sciences. Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1978. The evolutionary species concept reconsidered. System. Zool. 27:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenettcs: The Theory and Practice of Phylogenettc Systematics John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpoff, M. H. 1986. Describing anatomically modern Homo sapiens. A distinction without a definable difference. Anthropos (Brno) 23:41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. 1932. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, crossbreeding, and selection in evolution. Proc. Sixth Int. Congr. Genetics 1:356–366.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eldredge, N. (1993). What, If Anything, Is a Species?. In: Kimbel, W.H., Martin, L.B. (eds) Species, Species Concepts and Primate Evolution. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3745-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3747-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3745-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics