Skip to main content

Post-Occupancy Evaluation from the Client’s Perspective

  • Chapter
Building Evaluation

Abstract

This chapter discusses concerns, questions, problems, and opportunities of POE (post-occupancy evaluation) from the client’s perspective. Its thesis is that the planning of POE must not only satisfy professional criteria such as reliability and integrity, but that the fundamental strategy and planning of the POE should also be sensitive to the client’s personal, organizational and political context. Specifically, the chapter addresses the importance of making planning factors such as purpose, building sample, content, rigor, tools and techniques, participants, scheduling, cost, and reporting method responsive to client concerns such as avoiding embarrassment, defending results, satisfying administrative superiors, boosting morale, minimizing disruption, resolving conflicts, and obtaining maximum public relations benefit from the POE study. Neglect of these contextual factors can lead to POE results which satisfy professional criteria, but which are useless and even counterproductive for the client’s organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Building Research Board, 1987, Post-Occupancy Evaluation Practices in the Building Process: Opportunities for Improvement, Washington, D.C, National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. and Spreckelmeyer, K., 1981, Evaluating Built Environments: A Behavioral Approach, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preiser, W., Rabinowitz, H., and White, E., 1988, Post-Occupancy Evaluation, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E., 1983, The Value of Post-Occupancy Evaluation to the Architect in Government, Tucson, Arizona, Architectural Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E., 1985, Building Evaluation in Professional Practice, Tucson, Arizona, Architectural Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E., 1988, Programming, Post-Occupancy Evaluation and the Financial Success of the Architect, Tucson, Arizona, Architectural Media Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E., 1988, An Automated Facility Management System for the Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, Institute for Building Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, C., 1986, Final Report: Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the School of Architecture at Florida A&M, Atlanta, Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, E.T. (1989). Post-Occupancy Evaluation from the Client’s Perspective. In: Preiser, W.F.E. (eds) Building Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3722-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3722-3_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3724-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3722-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics