Skip to main content

Quality Down Under: Building Evaluation in Australia

  • Chapter
Building Evaluation
  • 377 Accesses

Abstract

The bicentennial of European settlement in Australia has led to a number of public and private questions about how Australia has performed in the first two hundred years and where it might be heading in the future. The most obvious changes in Australia since 1788 have been environmental, cultural, and political. It is therefore not surprising that architects and environmental designers generally are looking again at their performance, and the the Australian government is leading the charge towards a proper system for environmental assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allan, P., and Funneil, S., July 1987, Five Year Plans for Program Performance Reviews, paper presented at the National Evaluation Conference of the Australasian Evaluation Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baden, R., June 1987, Are You Quality Assured?, in: The Architect, pp. 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsher, R. B. and Harrison, H. W., September 1982, Traditional Housing: a BRE Study of Quality, in: Building Research Establishment Information Paper 18/82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, R. L., and Koch, M., 1981, A Method for Users to Review Facility Concept Designs, in: C.E.R.L. Technical Report, Illinois, p. 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauer, R. L. and Preiser, W. F. E., May 1976, Impact of Organisational Form on Identification of User Requirements in Building Delivery, in: CIB Working Commission No. 65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Building Appraisal: St. Michael’s Academy Kilwinning, in: Architect’s Journal (Information Library), January 1970, pp. 10–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Building Performance Research Unit, December 1967, Measurement and Appraisal of Building Performance, in: Architect’s Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. V., and Thorne, R., March 1972, Attitudes to Housing: A Cross Cultural Comparison, in: Environment and Behavior, 4(1) March (3–p), 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daish, J., Gray, J., and Kernohan, D., Post-Occupancy Evaluation of Government Buildings, School of Architecture, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defects in Post-War Housing: Feedback and Prevention: Report of HTC Seminar, in: Housing Review, March-April 1983, pp. 63–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’isola, A., 1982, Value Engineering in the Construction Industry, 3rd Edition, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Housing and Construction, Canberra, 1986, Draft POE Explanatory Manual and Field Manual.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, J., Turner, G., and Rubin, A. I., 1979, Post-Occupancy Evaluation: A Case Study of the Evaluation Process, Center for Building Technology, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, H. W. and Keeble, E. J., August 1981, Working with the Performance Concept in Building, in: CIB Working Commission, No. 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., Spring 1986, Quality Assurance in Design, in: Feedback Digest 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, N. M., 1981, Evaluation of the Post-Occupancy Performance of Buildings: A State of the Art Report, in: Experimental Building Station, 1981 Technical Record 462, Chatswood, New South Wales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, H. G., 1985, Concepts of Project (Building) Evaluation: An Overview, Canberra, National Committee on Rationalised Building.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linard, K. T., August 1987, Management of Program Evaluation in Portfolios, in: Practical Management Issues, Vol. 1/1, Department of Finance, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, T. A., December 1967, The Role of Building Performance Measurement and Appraisal in Design Method, in: Architect’s Journal, pp. 1567–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, T. A. (Ed.), 1972, Building Performance, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, T. A., 1973, Optimism by Evaluation in the Appraisal of Building, in: G. H. Hutton and A. D. G. Devonvald, Value in Buildings, Applied Science Publications, London, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Committee on Rationalised Building, 1984, A National System for Building Life Cycle Cost Performance Data Reading, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Public Works Conference, September 1984, Measurement of Performance of Public Construction Agencies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, J. and Ash, J., August 1966, Appraisal of User Requirements in Mass Housing, in: Architect’s Journal (Information Library), pp. 479–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Performance Standards in Building, Draft International Standard ISO /DIS 6241, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post-Occupancy Evaluation: The “State of the Art”, in: Research and Design, Vol. 1, July 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children, in: Architect’s Journal (Information Library), September 1972, pp. 526–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Space Shuttle Challenger Incident, in: Project Management Journal, Vol., XVIII, No. 2, June 1987, pp. 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standards Association of Australia, 1987, Australian Standard 2990–1987: Quality Systems for Engineering and Construction Projects, North Sydney.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, J., December 1986, Quality Assurance Overseas, in: DHC Technical Bulletin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, B. W. P., Subjective Responses to the Lighting Installation in Modern Office Building and their Design Implications, in: Building Science, Vol. 1, 1965, pp. 57–67.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pegrum, R., Bycroft, P. (1989). Quality Down Under: Building Evaluation in Australia. In: Preiser, W.F.E. (eds) Building Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3722-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3722-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3724-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3722-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics