Abstract
Despite of the permanent progress in the theory of direct methods a problem of physical interpretation of phase relations is still not clear enough. Schenk (1981) has given a graphic explanation of phase triplets and quartets on the basis of electron density considerations. Such a geometrical approach is very convenient and viseable, however it does not take into account a real process of X-ray scattering by crystal. In direct methods a crystal is considered as an ideal infinite periodic structure. Therefore, direct methods are also valid for a large perfect crystal and one can compare phase relations of direct methods with inferences of the dynamic theory of X-ray diffraction. For this purpose we use Ewald’s dynamical theory in the case of three strong coplanar beams (Ewald & Heno, 1968; Post, 1979). The condition of compatibility of the dynamical equations has the form
where ∈0 is a resonance error, Г ≃ e2λ2/mc2πV, V is the volume of the unit cell. Determinant (1) (except the diagonal terms) is identical to the Karle — Hauptman’s one. If we had taken more waves into consideration we would have got a determinant of a higher order. Unfortunately, ∈0 cannot be measured or calculated for an unknown structure. Nevertheless, we can use the determinant (1) for some illustrations. Expansion of the latter yields the dispersion equation
where
.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ewald, P.P., and Heno, Y., 1968, X-ray diffraction in the case of three strong rays. I. Crystal composed of non-absorbing point atoms, Acta Cryst., A24:5.
Gerber, R.B., and Karplus, M., 1972, On the determination of the phases of electromagnetic scattering amplitudes from experimental data, J. Chem. Phys., 56:1921.
Gerber, R.B., and Karplus, M., 1972, Derivation of phase-determining relations from the unitary theorem of electromagnetic scattering (unpublished).
Post, B., 1979, A solution of the X-ray ‘phase problem’, Acta Cryst., A35:17.
Schenk, H., 1981, The negative-quartet relation from electron-density considerations, Acta Cryst., A37:573.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mishnev, A.F. (1991). Some Considerations Concerning the Physical Interpretation of Sayre’s Equation and Phase Triplets in Direct Methods. In: Schenk, H. (eds) Direct Methods of Solving Crystal Structures. NATO ASI Series, vol 274. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3692-9_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3692-9_39
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3694-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3692-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive