Abstract
In applying the ideas of the preceding chapter to organic superconductors, it is necessary to keep in mind three essential experimental facts: (a) there is a crossover from spin-density wave order to superconductivity as the pressure is increased (b) there is no 2kF charge-density wave and (c) the spin susceptibility is not activated. Using the general discussion of the previous chapter, it follows that U > 0 and V1 (or an appropriate combination of Vn) is negative at high pressure. This conclusion is not restricted to the one-dimensional region but it does assume that the pairing involves electrons on the same stack. However, in the general context of organic conductors, it is not easy to imagine that V1 can be as attractive as the experiments seem to require1. There is ample evidence of quite strong repulsive interactions in organic conductors, and In the conventional BCS picture of superconductivity this has to be overcome by the retarded electron-phonon interaction, to produce pairing. For the latter, an electron or hole distorts the lattice in its immediate neighborhood, and a second electron or hole feels the distortion as an effective attractive coupling to the first. The Coulomb repulsion can be overcome because the distortion takes some time to decay, and is active after the first electron or hole has moved away.
Work supported by Division of Materials Sciences U.S. Department of Energy, under Contract No. DE-AC02-76CH00016.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
V. J. Emery, J. Phys. (Paris), Colloq. 44, C3–977 (1983).
I thank J. Voigt and S. Barišić for discussion of this point.
R. Moret, S. Ravy, J. P. Pouget, R. Comes and K. Bechgaard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1915 (1986).
The experiment4 did not actually extend into the superconducting phase and, in principle another structural transition could intervene.
C. Coulon et. al., Phys. Rev. B 26, 6322 (1982).
V. J. Emery, Syn. Met. 13, 21 (1986).
K. A. Muttalib and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1370 (1986).
P. Garoche, R. Brusetti, D. Jérome and K. Bechgaard, J. Phys. (Paris) Lett. 43, 147 (1982).
A. J. Leggett, J. C. Wheatley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 331 (1975).
C. J. Pethick and D. Pines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 118 (1986).
M. T. Béal-Monod, C. Bourbonnais and V. J. Emery, Phys. Rev. B 34 (1986). Note that here we use the even (odd) part of the singlet (triplet) interaction.
D. J. Scalapino, E. Loh, Jr. and J. E. Hirsch, Phys. Rev. B34 (1986); K. Miyake, S. Schmitt-Rink and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B34 (1986). See also Ref. 11.
C. Minot and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 26, 4793 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Emery, V.J. (1987). Mechanisms of Organic Superconductivity. In: Jérome, D., Caron, L.G. (eds) Low-Dimensional Conductors and Superconductors. NATO ASI Series, vol 155. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3611-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3611-0_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3613-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3611-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive