Skip to main content

Market Concentration and Structural Power as Sources of Industrial Productivity

  • Chapter
Industries, Firms, and Jobs

Part of the book series: Springer Studies in Work and Industry ((SSWI))

Abstract

This is a discussion about productivity variation among U.S. industries. Sociologists rarely study productivity, and when they do, it is most often in the terms and using the theories of economists (e.g., Galle, Wiswell, and Burr, 1985). The most common notion of productivity is that it reflects the effort of productive actors in organizational settings (i.e., firms), particularly the quality of labor and the extent of capital investment. This chapter argues that variations in productivity must be understood in terms of the power that producers have to set prices as well. In effect, I am extending the intra-organizational analysis of productivity as the efficiency with which products are created to an interorganizational sensibility that value is determined by the power of sellers in product markets. The degree of market concentration for a product, the structural power of producers (i.e., industry) in the larger economy, and the concentration of consumers will all effect the price for which a product can be sold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Averitt, Robert. 1968. The Dual Economy. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, Paul, and Paul Sweezy. 1969. Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, E. M., Patrick, M. Horan, and Charles M. Tolbert III. 1978. “Stratification in the Dual Economy: A Sectoral Model of Earnings Discrimination.” American Sociological Review 43: 704–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1964. Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1971a. “Investment in Human Capital: Effects on Earnings.” Pp. 159–177 in Readings in Labor Market Analysis, edited by John Burton. New York: Holt, Rinehart Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1971b. The Economics of Discrimination, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bibb, Robert, and William H. Form. 1977. “The Effects of Industrial, Occupational, and Sex Stratification on Wages in Blue-Collar Markets.” Social Forces 55: 974–996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter, and Otis Dudley Duncan. 1967. The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, Barry. 1968. “Lower-Income Workers and Marginal Industries.” Pp. 273–302 in Paverty in America, edited by Louis Ferman, Joyce L. Kornbluh and Alan Haber. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluestone, Barry, William M. Murphy, and Mary Stevenson. 1973. Low Wages and the Working Poor. Ann Arbor: Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S. 1983. Corporate Profits and Co-optation. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burt, Ronald S., Christman, K. K., and Kilburn, H. C. 1980. “Testing a Structural Theory of Corporate Co-optation: Inter-organizational Directorate Ties as a Strategy for Avoiding Market Constraints on Profits.” American Sociological Review 45: 821–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, Mary, and Gregory Duncan. 1979. “Work History, Labor Force Attachment, and Earning Differences between the Races and Sexes.” Journal of Human Resources 14: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, Edward F. 1974. Accounting for U.S. Economic Growth 1929–1969. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter, and Michael Piore. 1971. Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gailbraith, John K. 1967. The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galle, Omer R., Candace Hinson Wiswell, and Jeffrey A. Burr. 1985. “Racial Mix and Industrial Productivity.” American Sociological Review 50: 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallop, Frank, and Dale Jorgenson. 1980. “U.S. Productivity Growth by Industry 1947–1973.” Pp. 17–136 in New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis, edited by John W. Kendrick and Beatrice N. Vaccara. NBER Studies in Income and Wealth 44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, David M. 1972. Theories of Poverty and Underemployment. Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy D. 1978. “Labor in the Monopoly, Competitive, and State Sectors of Production.” Politics and Society 8: 141–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, Randy. 1984. Workers’ Earnings and Corporate Economic Structure. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, Arne, Michael Wallace, and Robert Althauser. 1981. “Economic Segmentation, Worker Power, and Income Inequality.” American Journal of Sociology 87: 651–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Robert L. 1980. Racial Discrimination and Labor Market Segmentation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, John. 1973. Postwar Productivity Trends in the United States, 1948–1973. Prepared for the National Bureau of Economic Research. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunze, Kent. 1979. “Evaluation of Work Force Adjustment.” Pp. 334–362 in Measurement and Interpretation of Productivity, edited by Panel to Review Productivity Statistics. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, Jacob. 1974. Schooling, Experience, and Earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, James. 1973. The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Panel to Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Statistics (ed) 1979. Measurement and Interpretation of Productivity. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, Luca. 1984. “Positional Power, Strikes and Wages.” American Sociological Review 49: 412–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. 1970. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaskovic-Devey, Donald. 1986. April. “Organizational Resources, the Social Organization of Production, and the Quality of Jobs.” Paper presented at the Southern Sociological Society Meetings, New Orleans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, Donald J., and Heidi Hartmann. 1981. Women, Work, and Wages: Equal Pay for Jobs of Equal Value. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldorf, William. 1973. “Quality of Labor in Manufacturing.” Review of Economic Statistics 55: 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Erik Olin, and Luca Perrone. 1977. “Marxist Class Categories and Income Inequality.” American Sociological Review 42: 32–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tomaskovic-Devey, D. (1988). Market Concentration and Structural Power as Sources of Industrial Productivity. In: Farkas, G., England, P. (eds) Industries, Firms, and Jobs. Springer Studies in Work and Industry. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3536-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3536-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3538-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3536-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics