Skip to main content

Our Approach to Benefit-Cost Analysis

  • Chapter
Program Evaluation

Abstract

Benefit-cost analysis is essentially a structured comparison. Thus, as the first step in a benefit-cost analysis, the analyst must specify the program or policy being evaluated and the program or option with which it will be compared. This specification should include information on such factors as the persons being served, the treatments being offered, and the environment in which the program or policy will operate. These two alternatives—the program and the comparison situation—essentially define the scope, and ultimately the results, of the analysis. All work in the study, including the interpretation of the findings, must be undertaken in relation to these two alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Additional Readings

  • Amemiga, T. (1985). Advanced econometrics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingnon, F. C., Dodson, R., & Root, G. (1977). Benefit-cost analysis of vocational rehabilitation services provided by the California Department of Rehabilitation. Berkeley: Berkeley Planning Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, E. M. (1981). Benefit-cost analysis of government programs. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, J. B., & Morgan, J. N. (1971). Economic survey methods. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, H. M. (1975). Cost-effectiveness analysis in evaluation research. In M. Guttentag & E. L. Struening (Eds.), Handbook of evaluation research, Vol. 2 (pp. 89–124). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, J. H. (1977). The limits of cost-benefit analysis as a guide to priority-setting in rehabilitation. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 347–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. E. (1982). Evaluation: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen, J. E., & Grove, H. D. (1977). Cost-outcome and cost-effectiveness analysis: Emerging nonprofit performance evaluation techniques. The Accounting Review, 52(3), 658–675.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, M. D. (1980). Benefit-cost analysis for program evaluation. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, K. E., & Luce, B. R. (1982). Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis in health care. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schalock, R.L., Thornton, C.V.D. (1988). Our Approach to Benefit-Cost Analysis. In: Program Evaluation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3508-3_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-3510-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3508-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics