Skip to main content

Tempest in a Test Tube

  • Chapter
  • 142 Accesses

Abstract

The scientists’ compulsion to fiddle with nature and change the course of natural events makes people, including many scientists, uneasy about the future. This is nowhere more evident than when dealing with human reproduction. The numerous taboos surrounding sexuality, including secrecy, and reticence toward openly discussing personal sexual matters create a tension that intensifies differences about the morality of sexual practices and innovations in fertility techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Endnotes

  1. Robert Edwards and Patrick Steptoe, A Matter of Life: The Story of a Medical Breakthrough ( New York: William Morrow and Co., 1980 ).

    Google Scholar 

  2. George R Will, “Will Man-Made Man Be Next?” Los Angeles Times, August 4, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ethics Committee of the American Fertility Society, “Ethical Considerations of Assisted Reproductive Technologies,” Fertility and Sterility 62, No. 5 (November 1994), pp. i-vi, 1S–125S.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colin Norman, “IVF Research to End?” Science 241 (July 22, 1988), pp. 405–406.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marlene Cimons, “Clinton Bans Funding for Embryo Creation,” Los Angeles Times, December 3, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keith Stewart Thompson, “Research on Human Embryos: Where to Draw the Line?”: American Scientist 73 (March—April 1985), pp. 187–189.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jonathan Glover and others, Ethics of New Reproductive Technologies: The Glover Report to the European Commission ( De Kalb: Northern Illinois University Press, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell Chandler, “Vatican Condemns Human Artificial Reproduction,” Los Angeles Times, March 10, 1987, pp. 1, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Fishel and E. M. Symonds, eds., In Vitro Fertilization: Past-Present-Future ( Oxford: IRL Press, 1986 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eliot Marshall, “Rules of Embryo Research Due Out,” Science 265 (August 19, 1994), pp. 1024–1026.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard T. Hull, ed., Ethical Issues in the New Reproductive Technologies ( Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abigail Goldman, “Eagle Rock Woman, 50, Gives Birth to Triplets,” Los Angeles Times, November 12, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Julie Marquis and Tracy Weber, “Clinic Whistle-Blowers Were Paid to Keep Quiet,” Los Angeles Times, June 2, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard Stone, “Religious Leaders Oppose Patenting Genes and Animals,” Science 268 (May 26, 1995), p. 1126.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larry B. Stammer and Robert Lee Hotz, “Faiths Unite to Oppose Patents on Life Forms,” Los Angeles Times (May 8, 1995), p. Al.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frozen Assets: ‘Twin’ Sisters Born 18 Moths Apart,“ Los Angeles Times, April 24, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H. Graham, Eternal Eve (Garden City, NY: Doubleday and Co., 1951), p. 41, cited by Batzofin.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. J. Ericsson, C. N. Langerin, and M. Nishino, “Isolation of Fractions Rich in Human Y Sperm,” Nature 246 (1973), p. 421, cited by Batzofin.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Joel H. Batzofin, Sex Selection-An Overview, (available from the Huntington Reproductive Center, Pasadena, CA), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. David M. Rorvik, In His Image: The Cloning of a Man ( New York: J. B. Lippincott Co., 1978 ).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Constance Holden, “Random Samples: Embryo Cloners Jumpedthe Gun,” Science 266 (December 23, 1994), p. 1949.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Constance Holden, “Random Samples: Perils of Freezing Embryos,” Science 267 (February 3, 1995), pp. 618–619.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M. Goodman, B. F. Koop, J. Czelusniak, D. H. A. Fitch, D. A. Tagle, and J. L. Slightom, “Molecular Phylogeny of the Family of Apes and Humans,” Genome 31 (1989), pp. 316–335, cited by Carl Sagan and Ann Druyan, Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors ( New York: Ballantine Books, 1992 ).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, ed. and trans. Stuart Atkins, Faust: A Tragedy, Parts I and II ( Boston: Suhrkamp/Insel, 1984 ).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Aldous Huxley, Brave New World (New York: Harper and Row, 1932, 1939; Bantam Books, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Through the Glass Lightly,“ Science 267 (March 17, 1995), pp. 1609–1618 (quotation, p. 1609).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lori B. Andrews, New Conceptions: A Consumer’s Guide to the Newest Infertility Treatments, Including In Vitro Fertilization, Artificial Insemination, and Surrogate Motherhood (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Annette Baran and Reuben Pannor, Lethal Secrets: The Shocking Consequences and Unsolved Problems of Artificial Insemination ( New York: Warner Books, 1989 ).

    Google Scholar 

  29. David R. Bromham, Maureen E. Dalton, and Jennifer C. Jackson, eds., Philosophical Ethics in Reproductive Medicine ( Manchester, England: Manchester University Press 1990 ).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Guidelines for Gamete Donation: 1993,“ Fertility and Sterility, Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Supplement 1, 59, No. 2 (February 1993), pp. 1S–9S.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Guidelines for Human Embryology and Andrology Laboratories,“ Fertility and Sterility, Official Journal of the American Fertility Society, Supplement 1, 58, No. 4 (October 1992), pp. 1S–16S.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Robert Lee Hotz, Designs on Life: Exploring the New Frontiers of Human Fertility ( New York: Pocket Books, 1991 ).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Intrauterine Insemination,“ The American Fertility Society: Guideline for Practice, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Steven Maynard Moody, The Dilemma of the Fetus: Fetal Research, Medical Progress and Moral Politics ( New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1995 ).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Richard Stone, “Religious Leaders Oppose Patenting Genes and Animals,” Science 268 (May 26, 1995), p. 1126.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Kenneth Maxwell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maxwell, K. (1996). Tempest in a Test Tube. In: A Sexual Odyssey. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3462-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3462-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45405-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3462-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics