Skip to main content

Employers, managers and the conduct of industrial relations

  • Chapter
Book cover Industrial Relations in the NHS
  • 26 Accesses

Abstract

Until the late 1960s administrators and hospital secretaries carried out the duties of today’s managers. In industrial relations there was little to do. Pay and conditions of service were largely determined at central level of the national system, and hospital and health authority managers implemented Whitley. In the field of ‘managerial relations’ such as discipline and grievance the employers and managers held sway with few rights for individual staff unless they were doctors or dentists. The system fed off the low level of trade union activity at the level of the employer, and the highly centralized and undemocratic nature of most of the representative organizations at national level. The democratic ‘deficit’ that characterized much NHS decisionmaking was nowhere more apparent than in the attitudes and activities of these pre-managerial managers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. NBPI (National Board for Prices and Incomes) (1967) Pay and Conditions of Service of Manual Workers in Local Authorities, the National Health Service, Gas and Water Supply, Report No. 29, Cmnd 3230, HMSO, London. National Board for Prices and Incomes (NBPI) (1971) The Pay and Conditions of Service of Ancillary Workers in the National Health Service, Report No. 166, Cmnd 4644, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mailly, R., Dimmock, S. and Sethi, A. (1989) ‘Industrial relations in the NHS since 1979’, in Mailly, R., Dimmock, S. and Sethi, A. (eds), Industrial Relations in the Public Services, Routledge, London, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Industrial Relations Code of Practice, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ACAS (1977) Disciplinary Practice and Procedures in Employment, Code of Practice 1; Disclosure of Information to Trade Unions for Collective Bargaining Purposes, Code of Practice 2; Time Off for Trade Union Duties and Activities, Code of Practice 3, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McCarthy, W. (1976) Making Whitley Work: A Review of the Operation of the NHS Whitley Council System, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MSF evidence to the Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 1/2/1989, p. 100.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dyson, R. and Spary, K. (1979) ‘Professional Associations’, in Bosanquet, N. (ed.), Industrial Relations in the NHS: the Search for a System, King Edward’s Hospital Fund for London, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Clegg, H. (1980) Professions Supplementary to Medicine: Standing Commission on Pay Comparability, Report No. 4, Cmnd 7850, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Industrial action and days of action by members of the PAM unions. See report in the British Journal of Industrial Relations, November 1980, p. 390.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Trades Union Congress Health Services Committee (1981) Improving Industrial Relations in the National Health Service, TUC, London, pp. 163–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clay, T. (1987) Nurses: Power and Politics, Heinemann, London, p. 138.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mailly et al., op. cit., p. 135.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Purcell, J. and Sisson, K. (1983) ‘Strategies and Practice in the Management of Industrial Relations’, in Bain, G. (ed.), Industrial Relations in Britain, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Griffiths, R. (1983) NHS Management Inquiry, DHSS, London.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Report of the Resource Allocation Working Party (1976), HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guillebaud,C. (1956) Report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Cost of the National Health Service, Cmd 9663, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. NAHA evidence to the Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 18/1/1989, p. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Warlow, D. (1989) Report of the conditions of employment of staff employed in the NHS, Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  20. National Audit Office (1987) Competitive Tendering for Support Services in the NHS, HMSO, London, paragraph 6f.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Treasury HM report (1986) Using Private Enterprise in Government, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. NUPE evidence to the Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 1/2/89, p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Working for Patients (1989), Cm 555, HMSO, London, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  24. This was a confidential document prepared by senior personnel officers in the Trent RHA in 1989 and called, ‘Paper for General Managers of Self-Governing Hospital Trusts: Personnel Policy and Practice — the Challenges of the SGTs’.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Social Services Committee of the House of Commons (1989), Resourcing the NHS: The Government’s Plans for the Future of the NHS, Eight Report, HMSO, London, p. 69.

    Google Scholar 

  26. NAHA evidence to ibid. — 8th Report, p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Working for Patients, op. cit., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Crawshaw, R., Garland, M., Hines, B. and Anderson, B. (1990) ‘Developing Principles for Prudent Health Care Allocation: the Continuing Oregon Experiment’, Western Journal of Medicine, 152, pp. 441–6.

    Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy, op. cit., p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Seifert, R. (1990) ‘Prognosis for local bargaining in health and education’, Personnel Management, June, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  31. National Health Service Act, 1946.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Working for Patients, op. cit., p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ACAS (1978) Royal Commission on the NHS: ACAS Evidence, Report No.12, ACAS, London, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  34. NHS management bulletin, May 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 1989, paragraph 5.6.

    Google Scholar 

  36. NUPE evidence to Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 1/2/89, pp. 122–3.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ham, C. (1982) Health Policy in Britain, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 1989, p. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bosanquet (ed.), op. cit.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Patients First: Consultative Paper on the Structure and Management of the NHS in England and Wales (1979), DHSS, London.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Griffiths, op. cit., p. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Social Services Committee of the House of Commons, Third Report, 11/1/89, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Seifert, R. (1992). Employers, managers and the conduct of industrial relations. In: Industrial Relations in the NHS. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3214-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3214-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-56593-040-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3214-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics