Skip to main content

The classical X-ray work. I: Mutations. The target theory

  • Chapter
Mutation research

Abstract

Soon after the discovery of X-rays by Röntgen at the turn of the century, the effects of this new powerful type of radiation on biological systems were studied. Embryological and cytological disturbances were observed in a variety of organisms, and this led to attempts at influencing heredity by radiation. Indications that X-rays may produce hereditary changes in germ cells were obtained quite early, but decisive proof had to wait for the development of systems in which nuclear mutations could be clearly distinguished from other types of damage to e. g., the spindle apparatus or the cytoplasm, and in which mutation frequencies could be objectively measured. In the 1920s such systems became available in Drosophila and maize. The first definite proof for the mutagenic action of X-rays was obtained in 1927 by Muller on Dosophila (1)to be followed a year later by Stadler’s evidence for the production of mutations in maize (2). Even before this, Drosophila techniques had made it possible to discover X-ray effects on non-disjunction (3) and crossing-over (4,5). Since most of the classical X-ray work was done on Drosophila, this is the place to describe the two main tests used at that time and still used widely; the test for sex-linked lethals and the test for sexlinked visibles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Muller, H. J. (1927), ‘The problem of genic modification’, Fifth Int. Genetics Congress, Berlin; Z ind. Abst. Vererb. Lehre, I (suppl.), 234–260.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stadler, L.J. (1928), ‘Genetic effects of X-rays in maize’, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 14, 69–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mavor, J.W. (1924), ‘The production of non-disjunction by X-rays’, J. Exp. Zo-ol, 39, 381–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mavor, J.W. and Svenson, H.K. (1924), ‘An effect of X-rays on the linkage of Mendelian characters in the second chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster’, Genetics, 9, 70–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Friesen, H. (1937), ‘Artificial release of crossing-over in meiosis and mitosis’, Nature, 140, 362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Muller, H.J. (1928), ‘Mutation rate in DrosophilaGenetics, 13, 279–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zimmer, K.G. (1961), Studies on Quantitative Radiation Biology Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gray, L.H. (1946–47), ‘Comparative studies of the biological effects of X-rays, neutrons and other ionizing radiations’, British Medical Bulletin, 4, 11–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Demerec, M. and Sams, J. (1958), ‘Dose-effect relationships for X-ray induction of mutations in three genes of Escherichia coli.’, Science, 127, 1059.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shiomi, T., Inagaki, E., Inagaki, H. and Nakao, Y. (1963), ‘Mutation rates at low dose level in Drosophila melanogaster’, J. Radiation Research, 4, 105–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sparrow, A.H., Underbrink, A. and Rossi, H. (1972), ‘Mutations induced in Tradescantia by small doses of X-rays and neutrons; analysis of dose-response curves’, Science, 176, 916–918.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Crowther, J.A. (1924), ‘Some considerations relative to the action of X-rays on tissue cells’, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 96, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, H.J. (1950), ‘Some present problems in the genetic effects of radiation’, J. Cell. Comp. Physiol., 35, suppl. I., 9–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Serebrovskaya, R.J. and Shapiro, N.J. (1935), ‘The frequency of mutations induced by X-rays in the autosomes of mature and immature germ cells of Drosophila melanogaster males’, Dokl. Acad. Sci. U.S.S.R., 2, 421–428.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stadler, L.J. (1928), ‘The rate of induced mutation in relation to dormancy, temperature and dosage’, Anatomical Record, 41, 97.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Timoféeff-Ressovsky, N.W. (1939), Genetica Moderna. ed. Ulrico Hoepli, Milano.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Charlotte Auerbach

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Auerbach, C. (1976). The classical X-ray work. I: Mutations. The target theory. In: Mutation research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3103-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3103-0_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-11280-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3103-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics