Abstract
Modern obstetric practice includes ultrasound scans as part of the antenatal care programme offered to the pregnant woman. When this facility was introduced into the obstetric care plan it was soon realized that there were insufficient numbers of medical staff to undertake the volume of work required to satisfy the demand. This role was extended to non-medical staff and soon this group were providing the majority of the obstetric ultrasound service (Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1984). It was during these formative years that a number of constraints were placed upon the non-medical practitioners, particularly relating to the communication by the radiographer of the result of the scan to the pregnant woman if a problem was identified. Today the culture of the relationship between patients and professionals has altered and pregnant women have access to a wide range of information related to their pregnancies. This information can be explicit when dealing with ultrasound scans. As the technology improves and the knowledge base expands expectations about this aspect of care can be extremely high. However, differences in working practice of the various professionals now involved in obstetric ultrasound may affect direct communication of the scan result when abnormality is suspected. These constraints, together with other factors which affect communication between sonographer and patient are covered in this chapter.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1984) Report of the RCOG Working Party on Routine Ultrasound Examination in Pregnancy, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London.
Society and College of Radiographers (1988) Code of Professional Conduct for Radiographers, Society and College of Radiographers, London.
Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society (1991) Miscarriage, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death. Guidelines for Professionals, Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Society, London.
Support After Termination For Abnormality (1992) Guidelines for Ultrasonographers, Support After Termination for Fetal Abnormality, Rugby, Warwickshire.
Ursing, I. and Jorgensen, C. (1992) Ultrasound screening during pregnancy: psychological strain experienced by the investigating staff. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 13, 100–103.
Winkler, F. and Godwin, J. (1988) Access of Companions to Obstetric Ultrasound Departments: Report of a Survey for the Department of Health and Social Security, DHSS.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hollingsworth, J. (1994). The sonographer’s dilemma. In: Abramsky, L., Chapple, J. (eds) Prenatal Diagnosis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3027-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3027-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-412-55360-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3027-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive