Skip to main content

Legal issues in prenatal diagnosis

  • Chapter
Prenatal Diagnosis
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

The law plays a number of functions in relation to health care practice. It structures the relationship between professionals and patients/clients, setting the ground rules on which the health professions practise. Thus the laws governing consent, access to health records and confidentiality help to determine the character of the therapeutic relationship, hopefully as a partnership rather than one dominated by either a paternalistic professional or a consumerist patient. The law also has a role in setting limits to acceptable practice on behalf of society. Controversial ethical issues, such as those which arise when the termination of pregnancy is being considered, are regulated through a legal framework. This will rarely force a single solution upon unwilling professionals and clients, but it will often rule out some options.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee (1957) 1 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesen, D (1988) International Medical Malpractice Law, Martinus Nijhoff Publications, Dordrecht, Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, M.A. (1987) Abortion and Divorce in Western Law, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, A. (1991) The new law of abortion: clarification or ambiguity? Criminal Law Review 659–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.A. (1992) Medical Negligence, in Doctors, Patients and the Law, (ed. C. Dyer), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M.A. and Morris, A.E. (1989) Defensive medicine: myths and facts. Journal of the Medical Defence Union, 5, 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, I. (1992) Consent to treatment: the capable person, in Doctors, Patients and the Law, (ed. C. Dyer), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard v West Midlands Regional Health Authority (1983) 1 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 122–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay v Essex Area Health Authority (1982) Law Reports, Queens Bench 1166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1988) Power/Knowledge/Consent: medical decision-making. Modern Law Review 51, 245–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, J. (1994) Patients first: the role of rights, in Patient Centred Health Care, (ed. K.W.M. Fulford, S. Erser and A. Hope), Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1988) Foetal sex identification, abortion and the law. Family Law 18, 355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (1990) Abortion: the unexamined ground. Criminal Law Review 687–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (1991) Cosmetics, eugenics and ambivalence: the revision of the Abortion Act 1967. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 375–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • R v. Central Birmingham Health Authority, ex p. Walker; R v. Secretary of State for Social Services, ex p. Walker (1987) 3 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • R v. Ethical Committee of St Mary’s Hospital (Manchester), ex p. Harriott, (1988) 1 Family Law Reports 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • R v. Secretary of State for Social Services, West Midlands Regional Health Authority and Birmingham Area Health Authority, ex p. Hincks (1980) 1 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 93–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance v. Mid-Downs Health Authority (1991) 1 All England Law Reports 801–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re B (1981) 1 Weekly Law Reports 1421–1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re C (1989) 2 All England Law Reports 782–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re J (1990) 6 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re J (1992) 9 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilsher v. Essex Area Health Authority (1988) 3 Butterworths Medico-Legal Reports 37–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Montgomery, J. (1994). Legal issues in prenatal diagnosis. In: Abramsky, L., Chapple, J. (eds) Prenatal Diagnosis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3027-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3027-9_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-412-55360-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-3027-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics