Skip to main content

Evaluating the results of maternity care: statistical instruments

  • Chapter
  • 479 Accesses

Abstract

In the 20th century in all countries, medical and social resources have increasingly been devoted to providing a maternity service which is intended to make the birth safer for mother and child. But there has never been a concomitant allocation of statistical resources to measure to what extent the service provided, as a whole or in its constituent parts, has achieved its intended objective. Such evaluation as is available has had to be done by indirect methods. It is fragmentary but the pieces can be fitted together to indicate a consistent and convincing picture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Tew, M. (1981) Effects of scientific obstetrics on perinatal mortality. Health Soc. Ser. J., 91, 444–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell, R., Macdonald Davies, I. and Macfarlane, A. (1984) Home births in England and Wales; perinatal mortality according to intended place of delivery. Br. Med. J., 289, 721–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, J.K. (1981) Should home births be ruled out? The Times, 21 January.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chamberlain, G. (1981) Danger at home for new babies. Comment reported in The Observer, 15 June.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chalmers, I., Enkin, M. and Keirse, M.J.N.C. eds (1989) Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth (2 vols), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Macdonald, D., Grant, A., Sheridan-Pereira, M. et al. (1985) The Dublin randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 152, 524–39.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prendiville, W., Harding, J., Elbourne, E. et al. (1988) The Bristol third stage trial; active versus physiological management of the third stage of labour. Br. Med. J., 297, 1295–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Registrar General, Statistical Review of England and Wales Part I, Annual for the Years 1965 to 1973, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Birth Statistics, Annual for the Years 1974–92, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Butler, N.R. and Bonham, D.G. (1963) Perinatal Mortality, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ministry of Health / Department of Health and Social Security (1969) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects No. 119, 1964–66, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ministry of Health / Department of Health and Social Security (1972) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, Reports on Health and Social Subjects No. 1, 1967–69, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ministry of Health / Department of Health and Social Security (1975) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, Reports on Health and Social Subjects No. 11, 1970–72, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ministry of Health / Department of Health and Social Security (1979) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales, Reports on Health and Social Subjects No. 14, 1973–75, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chamberlain, G., Philipp, E., Howlett, B. et al. (1978) British Births 1970 Vol. 2, Obstetric Care, Heinemann, London, Chaps 2 and 5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tew, M. (1985) Place of birth and perinatal mortality. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract., 35, 390–4.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tew, M. (1986) Do obstetric intranatal interventions make birth safer? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 93, 659–74.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Campbell, R. and Macfarlane, A. (1987) Where To Be born? The Debate and the Evidence, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Central Midwives Board (1957) Report, Evidence to the Maternity Services Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Granger, C. and Newbold, P. (1974) Spurious correlations in econometrics. J. Econometr., 3, 111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Siegel, S. (1956) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, Chap. 9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Marjorie Tew

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tew, M. (1995). Evaluating the results of maternity care: statistical instruments. In: Safer Childbirth?. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2973-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2973-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-56593-302-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2973-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics