Skip to main content

Birth attendants and their places of practice

  • Chapter
  • 483 Accesses

Abstract

For most of human history procreation has been managed by the individuals concerned, as it is with other animals in the wild which, as the close observations of modern zoologists confirm, give birth unaided and without apparent pain or distress. Likewise in different times and places, there have been many records of women, unattended, giving birth simply and safely. For example, the American squaw, living in her tribal culture, carried on her normal activities throughout pregnancy. Then,

When she realises that her hour of delivery is at hand, she enters her cabin or betakes herself to some stream or spring, gives birth, washes the young ‘injun’ in the cold water, straps it on her back, and before she has been scarcely missed, has returned a full-fledged mother, and resumes her labours. [1, p. 113]

Dr Grantly Dick-Read, who inspired the Natural Birth Movement of the 20th century, was first drawn to this philosophy ‘by witnessing a woman in the battlefields of Flanders calmly delivering her own child and walking off laughing with the child at the breast. The woman followed her natural instinct and tradition’ [2]. The American anthropologist, Margaret Mead, recorded ‘I have never heard primitive women describe the pain of childbirth’ [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wertz, R.W. and Wertz, D.C. (1977) Lying-in: a History of Childbirth in America, The Free Press, New York. (Quoting J.H. Dye (1884) Painless Childbirth, Buffalo, pp. 53–4.)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Briance, P. (1985) Childbirth with confidence do it yourself. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol., 4, 67–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mead, M. (1972) Blackberry Winter: My Earlier Years, Morrow, New York, p. 51.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Genesis 3:16.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Donnison, J. (1977) Midwives and Medical Men, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Towler, J. and Bramall, J. (1986) Midwives in History and Society, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Towler and Bramall, Midwives in History, p. 118. (Quoting S. Stone, 1735, A Complete Practice of Midwifery, London.)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Towler and Bramall, Midwives in History, p. 123–5. (Quoting M. Stephen (1795) The Domestic Midwife, London.)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Drife, J.O. (1988) My grandchild’s birth. Br. Med. J., 297, 1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Holland, E. (1954) The medical schools and the teaching of midwifery, in Historical Review of British Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1800–1950, (eds J.M. Munro Kerr, R.W. Johnstone and M.H. Phillips), Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Chapter XXX.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berkeley, C. (1929) The teaching of midwifery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp., 37(4), 701–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Towler and Bramall, Midwives in History, p. 158 (Quoting F. Nightingale (1872) Notes on Lying-in Institutions and a Scheme for Training Midwives.)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wertz, R.W. and Wertz, D.C. (1977) Lying-in: A History of Childbirth in America, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walker, A. (1954) Midwife services, England and Wales, in Historical Review of British Obstetrics 1800–1950 (eds J.M. Munro Kerr, R.V. Johnstone, and M.H. Phillips), Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Chapter XXXIII.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cookson, I. (1967) The past and future of the maternity service. J. Coll. Gen. Pract., 13, 143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Claye, A.M. (1954) Obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia, in Historical Review of British Obstetrics 1800–1950 (eds J.M. Munro Kerr, R.V. Johnstone, and M.H. Phillips), Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Chapter XXVII.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw, W.F. (1954) Twenty-Five Years. The Story of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists 1929–1954, Churchill, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wertz and Wertz. Lying-in, pp. 145–7. (Quoting J.W. Williams (1912) Medical Education and the Midwife Problem in the United States. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 58.)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart, D. (1981) The Five Standards for Safe Childbearing, Napsac Reproductions, Marble Hill. (Quoting New York Academy of Medicine (1933) Maternal Mortality in New York, 1930–32, The Commonwealth Fund.)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Commonwealth Bureau of Statistics (1907–70) Demography, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  21. House of Commons Health Committee (1991) Maternity Services: Preconception, vol II, Minutes of evidence pp. 1–291. HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Biggs, J., Harden, R. and Howie, P. (1991) Undergraduate obstetrics and gynaecology in the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland, 1989. Br. J. Obstet, Gynaecol., 98, 127–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1983) Nutrition in Pregnancy, RCOG, London.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rush, D., Green, J., Mahomed, K. and Hytten, F. (1989) Dietary modification in pregnancy, in A Guide to Effective Care in Pregnancy and Childbirth (eds M Enkin, M. Keirse and I. Chalmers), Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Joint Working Party of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and the Royal College of General Practitioners (1981) Report on Training for Obstetrics and Gynaecology for General Practitioners, RCOG, Appendix I.

    Google Scholar 

  26. House of Commons Health Committee (1992) Maternity Services, vol III, Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence, HMSO, London, pp. 651–922.

    Google Scholar 

  27. The Royal College of General Practitioners and the Royal College of Obstetricians (1993) General Practitioner Vocational Training in Obstetrics and Gynaecology, RCGP, London.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Department of Health, Welsh Office, Scottish Home and Health Department, Department of Health and Social Services, Northern Ireland (1991) Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom 1985–87, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ennis, M. and Vincent, C. (1990) Obstetric accidents: a review of 64 cases. Br. Med. J., 300, 1365–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tindall, V., Martin, R. and Burslem, R. (1989) Preparation and Advice for the MRCOG, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bewley, S. (1991) The future obstetrician/gynaecologist. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 98, 237–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Department of Health (1993) Hospital Doctors — Training for the Future (The Caiman Report), HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chamberlain, G. and Gunn, P. (1987) Birthplace: The Report of the Confidential Enquiry into Facilities Available at the Place of Birth, John Wiley, Chichester, Table 5.5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Butler, N.R. and Bonham, D.G. (1963) Perinatal Mortality, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, Table No. 12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Registrar General (1972) Statistical Review of England and Wales for the Year 1970, Part II, HMSO, London, Tables B1 and B2.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, Birth Statistics (Annual 1974–1991), HMSO, London, Tables 8.1–8.3.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys (1985) Mortality Statistics: Perinatal and Infant: Social and Biological Factors, Series DH3, no. 18, HMSO, London, Table 23.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (1982) Report of the RCOG Working Party on Ante-natal and Intra-partum Care, RCOG, London.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tew, M. (1977) Where to be born? New Society, 27 January 120–1.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tew, M. (1977) Obstetric hospitals and general practitioner units — the statistical record. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract., 27, 689–94.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tew, M. (1978) The case against hospital deliveries: the statistical evidence, in The Place of Birth (eds S. Kitzinger and J. Davis), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Tew, M. (1979) The safest place of birth — further evidence. Lancet, i, 1388–90; ii, 523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tew, M. (1980) Facts not assertions of belief. Health Soc. Serv. J., 12 September, 1194–7.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tew, M. (1981) The effect of scientific obstetrics. Health Soc. Serv. J., 17 April, 444–6.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tew, M. (1982) Obstetrics versus midwifery — the verdict of the statistics, J. Matern. Child Health, May, 198–201.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tew, M. (1984) Understanding intranatal care through mortality statistics, in Pregnancy Care for the 1980s (eds L. Zander and G. Chamberlain), Royal Society of Medicine and Macmillan, London, pp. 105–25.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Tew, M. (1985) Safety in intranatal care: the statistics, in Modern Obstetrics in General Practice (ed. G.N. Marsh), Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 203–223.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Tew, M. (1985) Place of birth and perinatal mortality. J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract., 35, 390–4.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Tew, M. (1986) Do obstetric intranatal interventions make birth safer? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 93, 659–74.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Campbell, R. and Macfarlane, A. (1987) Where To Be Born? The Debate and the Evidence, National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  51. (1985) The Times, 13 and 21 August.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Cronk, M. (1992) How did we get into this mess in the first place? MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 2, 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  53. House of Commons Health Committee (1992) Maternity Services, vol. II, Appendices to the Minutes of Evidence, HMSO, London, pp. 338–650.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Warwick, C. (1992) Reflections on the current management of midwifery education. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 2, 251–4.

    Google Scholar 

  55. House of Commons Health Committee (1992) Maternity Service, vol. I, Report together with Appendices and the Proceedings of the Committee, (The Winterton Report), HMSO, London, paras 1–452, pp. i-xciii.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Association of Radical Midwives (1986) The Vision. Proposals for the Future of the Maternity Service, ARM, Ormskirk, Lancashire.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Royal College of Midwives (1987) The Role and Education of the Future Midwife in the United Kingdom, RCM, London.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wraight, A., Ball, J., Secombe, I. et al. (1993) Mapping Team Midwifery, Institute of Manpower Studies, University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Macdonald, R.R. (1987, 1988) In defence of obstetricians, Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 94, 95, 88, 205.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kent, J. and Maggs, C. (1992) An Evaluation of Pre-registration Midwifery Education in England: Working Paper 1, Research Design. Maggs Research Associates, Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Hindley, J. (1991) Pre-registration midwifery education: a student’s view. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 1, 382–3.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gaskin, I.M. (1992) Non-medical midwifery training. Napsac News, 17(1), 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Midwifery and the Law (1983) Mothering, special education, (ed. P.O. McMahon), Mothering Publications, Albuquerque, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rooks, J., Weatherby, N., Ernst, E. et al. (1989) Outcomes of care in birth centres. N. Engl. J. Med., 321, 1804–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. (1992) News item. Birth, 19 (2), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Korte, D. and Scaer, R. (1992) A Good Birth, A Safe Birth, 3rd edn. The Harvard Common Press, Boston, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Relyea, M. (1992) The rebirth of midwifery in Canada: an historical perspective. Midwifery, 8(4), 159–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Tew, M. and Damstra-Wijmenga, S. (1991) Safest birth attendants: recent Dutch evidence. Midwifery, 7, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Teijlingen, E. and McCaffery, P. (1987) The profession of midwife in the Netherlands. Midwifery, 3, 178–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Houd, S. and Oakley, A. (1986) Alternative perinatal services: report on a pilot survey, in Perinatal Health Services in Europe (ed. J. Phaff), World Health Organization, Croom Helm, Kent, p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Teijlingen, E. (1990) The profession of maternity home care assistant and its significance for the Dutch midwifery profession. Int. J. Nurs. Stud., 27, 355–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. World Health Organization (1992) Traditional Birth Attendants: a Joint WHO/ UNFPA/UNICEF Statement, WHO, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kwast, B. and Bentley, J. (1991) Introducing confident midwives: midwifery education-action for safe motherhood. Midwifery, 7, 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. World Health Organization (1985) Having a Baby in Europe: Public Health in Europe, 26, WHO Regional Office, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Conference Report (1987) Having a Baby in the United Kingdom. Lancet, i, 989–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Marjorie Tew

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tew, M. (1995). Birth attendants and their places of practice. In: Safer Childbirth?. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2973-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2973-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-56593-302-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2973-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics