Abstract
Those working with head-injured patients know the nature of the problem which confronts them in their particular sphere. Thus, the casualty surgeon will be aware of the range of problems seen in his department daily, from the infant who has fallen down a few steps and appears unscathed, to the tiler who has fallen off a roof at a time when he was earning a little extra money and was not insured by employers, through to the victim of a horrendous road traffic accident with multiple injuries, and, finally, to the unsteady, elderly person whose fall presages the end of independent existence. It is easy for this doctor to appreciate that factors such as alcohol, poor home design and lighting, perhaps contributed to such accidents. The neurosurgeon’s view of head injury may be that of dramatic intervention, often with equally dramatic recovery but sometimes with persistent coma or persistent vegetative state. He will also be aware of Jennett’s [1] observation that hypoxia and hypotension, and consequent increased disability, may result from delay in reaching the neurosurgical unit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gentleman D, Jennett B. Audit of transfer of unconscious head-injured patients to a Neurosurgical Centre. Lancet 1990; 335: 330–334.
Wade DT. Policies on the management of patients with head injury: the experience of the Oxford Region. Clinical Rehabilitation 1991; 5: 141–155.
Evans C. Rehabilitation of head injury in a rural community. Clinical Rehabilitation 1987; 1: 133–137.
Jennett B, Bond MR. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet 1975; i: 480–484.
Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet 1974; 2: 81–83.
Groswasser Z, Costeff H, Tamir A. Survivors of severe traumatic brain injury in childhood. I. Incidence, background and hospital course. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1985; 12(Supp): 6–9.
Eames P, Wood RL. Rehabilitation after severe brain injury: a follow-up study of a behaviour modification approach. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 613–619.
Oddy M, Coughlan T, Tyerman A, Jenkins D. Social adjustment after closed head injury: a further follow-up seven years after injury. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 1985; 48: 564–568.
Hermanova H. State of rehabilitation medicine in Europe in 1990 and targets for the year 2000. In: The National Concept of Rehabilitation Medicine. London: Royal College of Physicians of London, 1991: pp 21–31.
World Health Organization. The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1980.
Culyer AJ. The promise of a reformed NHS: an economists’ angle. British Medical Journal 1991; 302: 1253–1256.
Chamberlain MA (Chairman). The Ideal Management of Head Injury. Leeds: West Yorkshire Working Party, 1988.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chamberlain, M.A. (1995). Head injury — the challenge: principles and practice of service organization. In: Chamberlain, M.A., Neumann, V., Tennant, A. (eds) Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2871-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2871-9_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-56593-307-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2871-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive