Tata Lectures on Theta I pp 118-235 | Cite as

# Basic results on theta functions in several variables

Chapter

- 435 Downloads

## Abstract

We seek a generalization of the function (Here \(\vec n,\vec z\) are thought of as column vectors, so \(\mathop n\limits^{t \to } \) is a row vector, \(\mathop n\limits^{t \to } \cdot \vec z\) is the dot product, etc.; we shall drop the arrow where there is no reason for confusion between a scalar and a vector.)

*ϑ*(z, τ) of Chapter I where z є ℂ is replaced by a g-tuple \(\vec z = \left( {{z_1}, \cdots ,{z_g}} \right) \in {\mathbb{C}^g}\), and which, like the old*ϑ*, is quasi-periodic with respect to a lattice L but where L⊂ℂ^{g}. The higher-dimensional analog of τ is not so obvious. It consists in a symmetric g×g complex matrix Ω whose imaginary part is positive definite: why this is the correct generalization will appear later. Let log_{g}be the set of such Ω. Thus log_{g}is an open subset in ℂ^{g(g+l)/2}It is called the Siegel upper-half-space. The fundamental definition is:$$\vartheta \left( {\vec z,\Omega } \right) = \sum\limits_{\vec n \in {\mathbb{Z}^g}} {\exp \left( {\pi {\kern 1pt} {i^t}\vec n\Omega \vec n + 2\pi {i^t}\vec n \cdot \vec z} \right)} .$$

## Keywords

Functional Equation Holomorphic Function Meromorphic Function Modular Form Theta Function
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983