When I started work at San Quentin in 1947, I was employed as a psychiatric social worker in the prison hospital. The Chief Psychiatrist, my immediate superior, had a wide variety of assignments for me, but one on which he set great store was the preparation of psychiatric social histories of the men who were admitted to Condemned Row. They had to be seen as soon as possible after their arrival—“while they were still labile,” as the Chief liked to explain. By that he meant that they would be responsive to my inquiries and not influenced by the other condemned men, by their lawyers (of whom the Chief had a low opinion), or by their families. As soon as the newly admitted condemned man had had a physical examination, I was to make haste to the Row and conduct my interview.
KeywordsCapital Punishment Correctional Officer Death Penalty Case Chamber Door Previous Commitment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.What Happened to Stephen Nash? The Important Questions About Dangerousness,“ in In Fear of Each Other,John P. Conrad and Simon Dinitz (Lexington, Massachusetts: Lexington Books, 1977), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- 2.In Olmstead v. U.S. (1928), 277 U.S. 438, at 485.Google Scholar
- 3.H. L. A. Hart, Punishment and Responsibility (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968 ), p. 89.Google Scholar
- 4.Sonia Orwell and Ian Angus, eds., The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell, vol. 3 (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1968), p. 267.Google Scholar