Skip to main content

Justice and Equality

  • Chapter
The Death Penalty
  • 753 Accesses

Abstract

Let me now turn back to a moral aspect of the death penalty that is connected with the constitutional one just discussed. I wish to argue that even if there were discrimination against some groups, and even if discrimination were unavoidably connected with the death penalty rather than with its distribution—both these assumptions are contrary to fact—the death penalty still should not be abolished. Those who argue otherwise confuse justice and equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Ernest van den Haag and John P. Conrad

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Haag, E., Conrad, J.P. (1983). Justice and Equality. In: The Death Penalty. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2787-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2787-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-41416-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2787-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics