Skip to main content

Discrimination and Justice

  • Chapter
The Death Penalty

Abstract

Consider now the phrase used in the Eighth Amendment itself. It prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, not cruel or unusual punishment. Therefore, a punishment must be cruel and unusual to be unconstitutional. The framers meant to outlaw unusual punishment, if cruel. But not cruel punishment, if usual. A punishment has to be new (unusual) as well as cruel to be unconstitutional. The death penalty hardly qualifies on that score. For whether cruel or not, the death penalty is not “unusual” in this Eighth Amendment sense.* (There is another sense, of which anon.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Trop v. Dulles (1957), 356 U.S. 86.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pugh v. Locke,406 F. Supp. 318; see also Newman v. Alabama (1976), 559 F. Supp. 2d. Certiorari denied, 98 U.S. 3057.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Parigiano v. Garrihy (1976), 443 F. Supp. 956.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramos v. Lamn (1979), 485 F. Supp. 122. Affirmed in part and remanded in part, 10th Circuit Court of Appeals (1980), 639 F. Supp. 2d. Certiorari denied, 101 U.S. 1259.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ruiz v. Estelle (1981), 503 F. Supp. 1265. Execution stayed, 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, 650 F. Supp. 2d, 555.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weems v. U.S.,217 U.S. 349.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Virgina Woolf, The Common Reader ( New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1925 ), p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, vol. 2, trans. Phillips Bradley (New York: Knopf, 1945 ), pp. 165–166.

    Google Scholar 

  9. I include the Argentine military in the same select class as the KGB of the Soviet Union and the present regime in South Africa on the authority of Jacobo Timerman, who survived their maltreatment. See his Prisoner without a Name, Cell without a Number ( New York: Knopf, 1982 ).

    Google Scholar 

  10. For a Texan’s account of the vagaries of Texan statutory draftsmanship, see Charles L. Black, Jr., Capital Punishment: The Inevitability of Caprice and Mistake, 2nd ed., augmented (New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1981 ), pp. 114–121.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1983 Ernest van den Haag and John P. Conrad

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Haag, E., Conrad, J.P. (1983). Discrimination and Justice. In: The Death Penalty. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2787-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2787-3_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-306-41416-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2787-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics