Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems II pp 103-161 | Cite as

# Cross Section Maps for Geodesic Flows, I

- 5 Citations
- 294 Downloads

## Abstract

In this paper we investigate the relationship between two topics which at first sight seem unrelated. The first deals with ergodic properties of geodesic flows on two-dimensional surfaces of constant negative curvature, a rather active area in the thirties studied by many well known mathematicians. For a detailed survey of the work during that period see [H2]. The second one deals with ergodic properties of noninvertible mappings of the unit interval, a current popular subject and one also with an interesting history going back to Gauss (See [B]). We shall show how each of these subjects sheds light on the other. Ergodic properties of interval maps can be used to prove ergodicity of the flows and conversely. Furthermore, explicit formulas for invariant measures of interval maps can be derived from the invariance of hyperbolic measure for the flows. (Actually we could go a step further and trace a connection of these formulas to Liouville’s theorem for Hamiltonian Systems.) This fact is particularly interesting as there is a paucity of explicit formulas for invariant measures of interval maps and we have here a method of deriving a class of these. In particular we shall show how Gauss’s formula for the invariant measure associated with continued fractions, which seems to have been produced ad hoc, can be derived anew.

## Keywords

Invariant Measure Fuchsian Group Geodesic Flow Ergodic Property Fractional Linear Transformation## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- [AF]R. L. Adler and L. Flatto, Cross section maps for the geodesic flow on the modular surface, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems (to appear).Google Scholar
- [AKS]R. L. Adler, M. Keane, and M. Smorodinsky, A construction of a normal number for the continued fraction transformation, J. of Number Theory 13 (1981), 95–105.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [AW]R. L. Adler and B. Weiss, The ergodic infinite measure preserving transformation of Boole, Israel J. of Math. 16 (1973), 263–278.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [AK]W. Ambrose and S. Kakutani, Structure and continuity of measurable flows, Duke Math. J. 9 (1942), 25–42.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [AA]V. I. Arnold and A. Avez, Ergodic Problems of Classical Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, Inc. New York, 1968.Google Scholar
- [A]E. Artin, Ein Mechanisches System mit quasiergodischen Bahnen, Abh. Math. Sem., Univ. Hamburg 3 (1924), 170–175.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [B]P. Billingsley, Ergodic Theory and Information, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1965).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [Bi]G. D. Birkhoff, Dynamical Systems, AMS Colloquium pu-blications, vol. 9 (1927), reprinted (1966).Google Scholar
- [BS]Bowen and C. Series, Markov maps for Fuchsian groups, IHES publications 50 (1979).Google Scholar
- [CL]E. A. Coddington and N. Levinson, Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York (1955).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- [HW]G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright, Theory of Numbers, 4th edition, Oxford Univ. Press, London (1962).Google Scholar
- [H-1]G. A. Hedlund, A metrically transitive group defined by the modular group, Amer. J. Math. 57 (1935), 668–678.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [H-2]G. A. Hedlund, The dynamics of geodesic flows. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1939), 241–261.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [Ho]E. Hopf, Ergodic theory and the geodesic flow on surfaces of constant negative curvature, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 77 (1971), 863–877.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [K]S. Kakutani, Induced measure preserving transformations, Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 19 (1943), 635–641.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [L]J. Lehner, Discontinuous Groups and Automorphic Functions, AMS, Providence, R.I. (1964).Google Scholar
- [M]M. Morse, Symbolic dynamics, Institute for Advanced Study Notes, by Rufus Oldenburger, Princeton (1966) (unpublished).Google Scholar
- [Mo]J. Moser, Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Sys-tems, Annals of Math Studies 77, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ (1973).Google Scholar
- [MPV]J. Moser, E. Phillips, and S. Varadhan, Ergodic Theory, A Seminar, Lecture Notes, New York Univ., NY (1975).Google Scholar
- [N]J. Nielsen, Untersuchungen zur Topologie der gesch-lossenen Zweiseitigen Flächen, Acta Math. 50 (1927), 189–358.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [O]D. Ornstein, The isomorphism theorem for Bernoulli flows, Advances in Math 10 (1973), 124–142.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [OW]D. Ornstein and B. Weiss, Geodesic flows are Bernoullian, Israel J. Math 14 (1973), 184–198.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [R]A. Renyi, Representations for real numbers and their ergodic properties, Acta Math. Akad, Sci. Hungar, 8 (1957), 477–493.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [Ro]V. A. Rohlin, Exact endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space, Izv. Akad. Nauk, SSSR Ser. Mat. 25 (1961), 499–530, Russian, Amer. Math. Soc. Transi., Series 2, vol. 39 (1964), 1-37, English.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- [S]F. Schweiger, Some remarks on ergodicity and invariant measures, Mich.Math. J. 22 (1975), 181–187.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [Se-1]C. Series, Symbolic dynamics for geodesic flows, Acta Math. 146 (1981), 103–128.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [Se-2]—, On coding geodesics with continued fractions, Proc. Ergodic Theory Conf., Plans sur Bex (1980), ed. Pierre de la Harpe, Springer (to appear).Google Scholar