Advertisement

Cross Section Maps for Geodesic Flows, I

The Modular Surface
Chapter
Part of the Progress in Mathematics book series (PM, volume 21)

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the relationship between two topics which at first sight seem unrelated. The first deals with ergodic properties of geodesic flows on two-dimensional surfaces of constant negative curvature, a rather active area in the thirties studied by many well known mathematicians. For a detailed survey of the work during that period see [H2]. The second one deals with ergodic properties of noninvertible mappings of the unit interval, a current popular subject and one also with an interesting history going back to Gauss (See [B]). We shall show how each of these subjects sheds light on the other. Ergodic properties of interval maps can be used to prove ergodicity of the flows and conversely. Furthermore, explicit formulas for invariant measures of interval maps can be derived from the invariance of hyperbolic measure for the flows. (Actually we could go a step further and trace a connection of these formulas to Liouville’s theorem for Hamiltonian Systems.) This fact is particularly interesting as there is a paucity of explicit formulas for invariant measures of interval maps and we have here a method of deriving a class of these. In particular we shall show how Gauss’s formula for the invariant measure associated with continued fractions, which seems to have been produced ad hoc, can be derived anew.

Keywords

Invariant Measure Fuchsian Group Geodesic Flow Ergodic Property Fractional Linear Transformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [AF]
    R. L. Adler and L. Flatto, Cross section maps for the geodesic flow on the modular surface, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems (to appear).Google Scholar
  2. [AKS]
    R. L. Adler, M. Keane, and M. Smorodinsky, A construction of a normal number for the continued fraction transformation, J. of Number Theory 13 (1981), 95–105.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [AW]
    R. L. Adler and B. Weiss, The ergodic infinite measure preserving transformation of Boole, Israel J. of Math. 16 (1973), 263–278.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [AK]
    W. Ambrose and S. Kakutani, Structure and continuity of measurable flows, Duke Math. J. 9 (1942), 25–42.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [AA]
    V. I. Arnold and A. Avez, Ergodic Problems of Classical Mechanics, W. A. Benjamin, Inc. New York, 1968.Google Scholar
  6. [A]
    E. Artin, Ein Mechanisches System mit quasiergodischen Bahnen, Abh. Math. Sem., Univ. Hamburg 3 (1924), 170–175.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [B]
    P. Billingsley, Ergodic Theory and Information, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York (1965).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [Bi]
    G. D. Birkhoff, Dynamical Systems, AMS Colloquium pu-blications, vol. 9 (1927), reprinted (1966).Google Scholar
  9. [BS]
    Bowen and C. Series, Markov maps for Fuchsian groups, IHES publications 50 (1979).Google Scholar
  10. [CL]
    E. A. Coddington and N. Levinson, Theory of Ordinary Differential Equations, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. New York (1955).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [HW]
    G. H. Hardy and E. M. Wright, Theory of Numbers, 4th edition, Oxford Univ. Press, London (1962).Google Scholar
  12. [H-1]
    G. A. Hedlund, A metrically transitive group defined by the modular group, Amer. J. Math. 57 (1935), 668–678.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [H-2]
    G. A. Hedlund, The dynamics of geodesic flows. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 45 (1939), 241–261.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [Ho]
    E. Hopf, Ergodic theory and the geodesic flow on surfaces of constant negative curvature, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 77 (1971), 863–877.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [K]
    S. Kakutani, Induced measure preserving transformations, Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo 19 (1943), 635–641.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [L]
    J. Lehner, Discontinuous Groups and Automorphic Functions, AMS, Providence, R.I. (1964).Google Scholar
  17. [M]
    M. Morse, Symbolic dynamics, Institute for Advanced Study Notes, by Rufus Oldenburger, Princeton (1966) (unpublished).Google Scholar
  18. [Mo]
    J. Moser, Stable and Random Motions in Dynamical Sys-tems, Annals of Math Studies 77, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ (1973).Google Scholar
  19. [MPV]
    J. Moser, E. Phillips, and S. Varadhan, Ergodic Theory, A Seminar, Lecture Notes, New York Univ., NY (1975).Google Scholar
  20. [N]
    J. Nielsen, Untersuchungen zur Topologie der gesch-lossenen Zweiseitigen Flächen, Acta Math. 50 (1927), 189–358.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [O]
    D. Ornstein, The isomorphism theorem for Bernoulli flows, Advances in Math 10 (1973), 124–142.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [OW]
    D. Ornstein and B. Weiss, Geodesic flows are Bernoullian, Israel J. Math 14 (1973), 184–198.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [R]
    A. Renyi, Representations for real numbers and their ergodic properties, Acta Math. Akad, Sci. Hungar, 8 (1957), 477–493.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [Ro]
    V. A. Rohlin, Exact endomorphisms of a Lebesgue space, Izv. Akad. Nauk, SSSR Ser. Mat. 25 (1961), 499–530, Russian, Amer. Math. Soc. Transi., Series 2, vol. 39 (1964), 1-37, English.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [S]
    F. Schweiger, Some remarks on ergodicity and invariant measures, Mich.Math. J. 22 (1975), 181–187.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. [Se-1]
    C. Series, Symbolic dynamics for geodesic flows, Acta Math. 146 (1981), 103–128.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [Se-2]
    —, On coding geodesics with continued fractions, Proc. Ergodic Theory Conf., Plans sur Bex (1980), ed. Pierre de la Harpe, Springer (to appear).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBM Thomas J. Watson Research CenterYorktown HeightsUSA
  2. 2.Bell LaboratoriesMurray HillUSA

Personalised recommendations