Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Physics of Atoms and Molecules ((PAMO))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

When an atom is in a resonant laser field for a time that is long compared with the natural decay time of an excited state, then the probability that the state decays by emission of spontaneous photons into modes other than the laser mode must be included in our considerations. Since typical allowed spontaneous decay times are of the order of 10~8s, this is a common phenomenon. It is also a rather complicated phenomenon since in a typical experiment the atom may radiate (fluoresce) a thousand or so such photons. Thus, if we were to resort to a perturbation theory in the radiation operator, the theory would have to be carried to about the thousandth order. It is therefore necessary to have a technique for summing the important terms in the series. The existing theories fall into two categories: First there are the statistical ones1 which use the density matrix and resort to an ensemble average for the description of the observations. These lose nothing by their statistical nature since they describe the true state of affairs in which the entire state of the fluorescent field is never observed and so must be averaged. The second class are the so-called pure state theories2 which use wave functions and not density matrices and reserve sums over states for the last step. The latest versions of the two classes agree with each other and also have satisfactory agreement with experiment.3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. See, for example, M. Newstein, Phys. Rev. 167, 89 (1968), and J. R. Ackerhalt and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rev. D 10, 3350 (1974), for two different approaches. For an excellent review see G. S. Agrawal, Quantum Statistical Theories of Spontaneous Emission and their Relation to Other Approaches, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, S. Swain, J. Phys. A 8, 1277 (1975), and B. R. Mollow, Phys. Rev. A 12, 1919 (1975), for two different approaches of the pure state type.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F. Schuda, C. R. Stroud, Jr., and M. Hercher, J. Phys. B 7, L198 (1974);

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A. M. Bonch-Bruevich, V. A. Khedovoi, and N. A. Chigir, Sov. Phys. JETP 40, 1027 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Ferray, A. L. L’Huillier, X. F. Li, L. A. Lompre, G. Mainfrey, and C. Manus, J. Phys. B 21, L31 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, McGraw-Hill, New York (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See the second of Ref. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See, for example, A. I. Akhiezer and V. B. Berestetskii, Elements of Quantum Electrodynamics, Oldbourne Press, London (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. This equation, in various forms, has a long history in the literature; see, for example, the second and third of Ref. 1. It can be interpreted in a variety of ways but we choose to refer to it as a constraint on the wave function because it is local in time and because of its subsequent use to obtain (4.2.28). Equation (4.2.27) may also be obtained with higher accuracy. The additional terms on the right-hand side are of order γ/ ωL or ε/ ωL compared with those retained. They are always small.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. L. Goldberger and K. M. Watson, Collision Theory, Wiley, New York (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. H. Mittleman and A. Tip, J. Phys. B 17, 571 (1984), and E. J. Robinson, Phys. Rev. A 33, 1461 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. See any of Ref. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. This point has been emphasized in the discussion contained in the first of Ref. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Fiordilino and M. H. Mittleman, J. Phys. B 17, 3037 (1984).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. For an early review of the subject of optical pumping, see W. Happer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44, 169 (1972). The experimental two-state atom is discussed in I. A. Abate, Opt. Commun. 10, 269 (1974), and E. Y. Fu, R. E. Grove, and S. Ezekiel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1426 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Antibunching of photons has been described by L. Mandel, J. Opt. (Paris) 10, 55 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. This section is based on M. H. Mittleman, Phys. Rev. A 46, 4209 (1992), where a fuller description and the contribution of this effect to the width of these states are given.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mittleman, M.H. (1993). Spontaneous Radiation by Atoms in Lasers. In: Introduction to the Theory of Laser-Atom Interactions. Physics of Atoms and Molecules. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2436-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2436-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2438-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2436-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics