Abstract
A baseline human public health evaluation is required under the National Contingency Plan as a part of the Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study process. For the protection of aquatic organisms, many of the priority pollutants have Ambient Water Quality Criteria promulgated or pending, but few have criteria to protect terrestrial receptors. Contaminant levels judged to be acceptable may be determined following methods used to develop human values from literature sources. Part of this process involves the determination of uncertainty factors for which USEPA (1985) presents a step-wise approach to use in public health evaluations. This paper describes a similar step-wise approach to develop uncertainty factors to be applied to literature-cited toxicity values for aquatic and terrestrial organisms. When compared with the methodology used by USEPA (1986) for the assessing the risk to terrestrial animals, notably livestock, this method results in levels 2 to 4 orders of magnitude smaller than those developed by the regulatory risk criteria approach as specified in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act for pesticide evaluation. For aquatic organisms, the values are similar or only differ by approximately one order of magnitude, with the method described here representing the more conservative approach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1985, The Endangerment Assessment Handbook (Draft), Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1986, Hazard Evaluation Division Standard Evaluation Procedure Ecological Risk Assessment, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1989, Risk Assessment for Superfund Volume II Environmental Evaluation Manual, Interim Final, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/1-89/001, Washington, DC.
Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. (ESE), 1989, Biota Remedial Investigation, Fuel Report (Version 32), Vol. II, Denver, CO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chandler, A.B., Fordham, C.L. (1991). Development of Uncertainty Factors for Nonhuman Receptors. In: Garrick, B.J., Gekler, W.C. (eds) The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2370-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2370-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2372-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2370-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive