Skip to main content

Development of Uncertainty Factors for Nonhuman Receptors

  • Chapter
The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk

Part of the book series: Advances in Risk Analysis ((AIRA,volume 9))

  • 321 Accesses

Abstract

A baseline human public health evaluation is required under the National Contingency Plan as a part of the Remedial Investigation/ Feasibility Study process. For the protection of aquatic organisms, many of the priority pollutants have Ambient Water Quality Criteria promulgated or pending, but few have criteria to protect terrestrial receptors. Contaminant levels judged to be acceptable may be determined following methods used to develop human values from literature sources. Part of this process involves the determination of uncertainty factors for which USEPA (1985) presents a step-wise approach to use in public health evaluations. This paper describes a similar step-wise approach to develop uncertainty factors to be applied to literature-cited toxicity values for aquatic and terrestrial organisms. When compared with the methodology used by USEPA (1986) for the assessing the risk to terrestrial animals, notably livestock, this method results in levels 2 to 4 orders of magnitude smaller than those developed by the regulatory risk criteria approach as specified in the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act for pesticide evaluation. For aquatic organisms, the values are similar or only differ by approximately one order of magnitude, with the method described here representing the more conservative approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1985, The Endangerment Assessment Handbook (Draft), Office of Waste Programs Enforcement, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1986, Hazard Evaluation Division Standard Evaluation Procedure Ecological Risk Assessment, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 1989, Risk Assessment for Superfund Volume II Environmental Evaluation Manual, Interim Final, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, EPA/540/1-89/001, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. (ESE), 1989, Biota Remedial Investigation, Fuel Report (Version 32), Vol. II, Denver, CO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chandler, A.B., Fordham, C.L. (1991). Development of Uncertainty Factors for Nonhuman Receptors. In: Garrick, B.J., Gekler, W.C. (eds) The Analysis, Communication, and Perception of Risk. Advances in Risk Analysis, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2370-7_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2370-7_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2372-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2370-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics