Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Individual Differences ((PIDF))

Abstract

I must express my gratitude for being asked to participate in this anniversary celebration. The task assigned, a review of “science and the single case,” or the continuing saga of the study of the individual, allowed me to reexperience the pleasure I derived in reading Allport’s volume (1937) as a graduate student more than 40 years ago. While my present concern is centered in the first and last chapters, I was drawn to rereading the others as well. My impression was that despite the passage of the years, it could still be read with profit by graduate students today. With regard to the scientific study of the individual, the arguments remain timely and persuasive but certainly need retelling in light of our history over the past half-century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander, I. E. (1990). Personology: Method and content in personality assessment and psychobiology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1942). The use of personal documents in psychological science. New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1965). Letters from Jenny. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, R. (1971). Where is the person in personality research? Psychological Bulletin, 75, 203–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chassan, J. B. (1979). Research design in clinical psychology and psychiatry ( 2nd ed. ). New York: Irvington. (Original work published 1967 )

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, C. A. (1971). The assessment of lives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, P. 0., & Costello, C. G. (1969). N=1: Experimental studies of single cases. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, E. H. (1958). Young man Luther. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, E. H. (1969). Gandhi’s truth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersen, M., & Barlow, D. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, T. R. (Ed.) (1978). Single subject research. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36, 276–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1930). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of General Psychology, 5, 141–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P. (1990). The person: An introduction to personality psychology. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdams, D. P., & Ochberg, R. L. (Eds.). (1988). Psychobiography and life narratives. Special issue of the Journal of Personality, 56, 1–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCurdy, H. C. (1961). The personal world. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, C. D., & Murray, H. A. (1935). A method for investigating fantasies: The Thematic Apperception Test. Archives of Neurology and Psychiatry, 34, 209–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1955). American Icarus. In A. Burton & R. E. Harris (Eds.), Clinical

    Google Scholar 

  • studies in personality (Chapter XVIII). New York: Harper & Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, H. A. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, R. W. (1977). Clinical quantitative methods. New York: Grune and Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorschach, H. (1921). Psychodiagnostik. Bern: Bircher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, S., & Jones, R. (1972). A method for investigating and representing a person’s implicit theory of personality: Theodore Dreiser’s view of people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 372–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B., & Rafferty, J. E. (1950). Manual: The Rotter incomplete sentences blank. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, W. McK. (1982). Life histories and psychobiography. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, B. (1980). The philosophers: Their lives and the nature of their thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. B. (1966). The single case in clinical psychological research. Journal of General Psychology, 74, 3–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, D. K. (1975). Sociocultural context of individual creativity: A trans-historical time-series analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1119–1133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stolorow, R. D., & Atwood, G. E. (1979). Faces in a cloud: Subjectivity in personality theory. New York: Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1979). Script theory: Differential magnification of affects. In H. E. Howe & R. A. Dienstbier (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 00–00 ). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory. In J. Aronoff, A. I. Rabin, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality (pp. 147–216 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1991). Affect, imagery, consciousness: The negative affects—anger and fear (Vol. 3 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S. (1992). Affect, imagery, consciousness: Cognition—duplication and transformation of information (Vol. 4 ). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. W. (1975). Lives in progress. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. (Original work published 1952; subsequent publication 1966 )

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alexander, I.E. (1993). Science and the Single Case. In: Craik, K.H., Hogan, R., Wolfe, R.N. (eds) Fifty Years of Personality Psychology. Perspectives on Individual Differences. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2311-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2311-0_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2313-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2311-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics