Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Technological Hazards, Risk, and Society: A Perspective on Risk Analysis Research

  • Chapter
Risk/Benefit Analysis in Water Resources Planning and Management

  • 158 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years government support for the study of technological hazards and risks has substantially increased. Much of the research effort has been carried out through grants and contracts to statisticians, physicists, biologists, chemists, engineers, decision analysts, economists, and psychologists, although researchers from other disciplines have also made major contributions. Largely due to these efforts, there is now a significant body of knowledge on methods for identifying estimating, and evaluating risks; on institutional, political, and legal constraints associated with the risk management process; and on public perceptions of risk. It would be no exaggeration to say that as a result of these efforts a new and lively field of research has been created almost overnight.

Note: The views expressed in this paper do not necessarily represent the views of the National Science Foundation, but are exclusively those of the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arrow, K. J., 1974, “Essays in the Theory of Risk Bearing,” Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baram, Michael S., 1980, Cost-benefit analysis: an inadequate basis for health, safety, and environmental regulatory decision-making, Ecology Law Quarterly, 8:473–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baram, Michael S., 1979, “Regulation of Health, Safety and Environmental Quality and the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Final Report to the Administrative Conference of the United States, Washington, D.C.: Administrative Conference of the U.S.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazelon, D. L., 1979, Risk and responsibility, Science, 205:277–280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, Monroe, May 1979, Occupational safety and health, Ann. Am. Acad. of Polit. Soc. Sci., 443:41–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bick, Thomas, and Kasperson, Roger E., Oct. 1978, Pitfalls of hazard management: the CPSC experiment, Environment, 20:30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, S. C., and Niehaus, F., 1980, How safe is “too” safe? Int. Atomic Energy Agency Bull., 22:40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogen, Kenneth T., 1980, Public policy and technological risk, IDEA J. Law Tech., 21(1):37–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, I., Kates, R., and White, G., 1978, “The Environment as Hazard,” Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, John Jr., Feb. 1980, Estimating hazard, BioSci., 30:101–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Luther J., May 30, 1979, Dispute over cancer risk quantification, Science, 203:1324–1325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Luther J., May 25, 1979, How to assess cancer risks, Science, 204:811–816.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chalfant, James C., et al., 1979, Recombinant DNA: a case study in regulation of scientific research, Ecology Law Quarterly, 8(55):55–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicken, John C., 1975, “Hazard Control Policy in Britain,” Permagon Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, Bryan C., Mar. 1976, The value of human life in the demand for safety. Am. Econ. Rev., 66:45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello, Vincent, and Menkes, Joshua, 1981, Issues in risk analysis in: “Risk in the Technological Society,” C. Hohenemser and J. Kasperson, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichholz, Geoffrey G., Sept.–Oct. 1976, Cost-benefit assessment for nuclear plants, Nuclear Safety, 17:525–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Samuel S., 1979, “The Politics of Cancer,” Anchor Books, Garden City, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch, 1977, Cost-benefit analysis and the art of motorcycle maintenance, Policy Sci., 8:177–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch, May 1979, Informed consent in societal risk-benefit decisions, Tech. Forecasting Social Change, 13:347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, Baruch, et al., Sept. 1978, Handling hazards: can hazard management be improved? Environment, 20(7): 16–19, 32-37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Renee C., Winter 1980, The evolution of medical uncertainty, Milbank Mem. Fund Quarterly/Health & Society, 58:1–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, L., and Walker, C. A., eds., “Too Hot to Handle: Public Policy Issues in Nuclear Waste Management,” Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, Mark R., May 1979, A review and evaluation of selected government programs to handle risk, Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc Sci., 443:129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, E. Cuyler, and Selikoff, Irving J., eds., Oct. 26, 1979, Public control of environmental health hazards [45 related papers plus panel discussions], Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 329: 1–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hapgood, Fred, Jan. 1979, Risk-benefit analysis: putting a price on life, Atlantic, 243:33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harriss, Robert C., and Hohenemser, Christoph, Nov. 1978, Mercury measuring and managing the risk, Environment, 20:25–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, John H., et al., Jul./Aug. 1979, A risk business: energy production and the Inhaber Report, Environment, 20:28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inhaber, Herbert, Feb. 1979, Risk with energy from conventional and nonconventional sources, Science, 203:718–723.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Phillips, 1979 Analyzing environmental hazards, Environ. Sci. Tech., 13:526–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee, M. W., 1976, “The Value of Life: An Economic Analysis,” Martin Robertson & Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, Raphael, Aug. 1977, Cost-benefit analysis in environmental decision-making, George Washington Law Rev., 45:1013–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, Robert W., ed., 1977, “Managing Technological Hazard: Research Needs and Opportunities,” University of Colorado Institute of Behavioral Sciences, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletz, Trevor A., May 12, 1977, The risk equations: what risks should we run? New Scientist, 74:320–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, May 1979, The changing societal consequences of risks from natural hazards, Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., 443:104–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunreuther, Howard, 1978, “Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons,” Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, E. W., 1977, “Technology and Social Shock,” Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, Saul, Sept.–Oct. 1978, The role of risk assessment in the nuclear regulatory process, Nucl. Safety, 19:556–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnerooth, Joanne, Aug. 1976, Methods for evaluating mortality risk, Futures, 8:293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovins, Anthony B., 1977, Cost-risk-benefit assessments in energy policy, George Washington Law Rev., 45:911–943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowrance, William W., 1976, “Of Acceptable Risk,” William Kaufman, Los Altos, Cal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, James G., Jan. 1979, The Delaney clause and zero risk tolerance, Food, Drug, Cosmetic Law J., 311:43–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinty, Lawrence, and Atherley, Gordon, 12 May 1977, Acceptability versus democracy, New Scientist, 74:323–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendeloff, John, 1979, “Regulating Safety: An Economic and Political Analysis of Occupational Safety and Health Policy,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishan, Edward J., 1976, “Cost-Benefit Analysis,” Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • MITRE Corporation, The Metrek Division, Sept. 1979, “Risk Assessment and Governmental Decision-making; Symposium/Workshop on Nuclear and Nonnuclear Energy Systems, Proceedings,” The MITRE Corp., Metrek Division, McLean, Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, 1975, Committee on Principles of Decision-making for Regulating Chemicals in the Environment, “Decision-making for Regulating Chemicals in the Environment,” National Academic of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering, 1972, Committee on Public Engineering Policy. Perspectives on benefit-risk decision-making, “Report of a Colloquium Conducted by the Committee on Public Engineering Policy, National Academy of Engineering, Apr. 16–17, 1971,” National Academy of Engineering, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Sciences, 1977, National Research Council, Advisory Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation, “Considerations of Health Benefit Cost Analysis for Activities Involving Ionizing Radiation and Alternatives,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. (EPA 520/4-77-003).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Mar. 1980, “Perceptions of Risk; Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting, Mar 14–15, 1979, Washington, D.C,” pp. 1-168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D., ed., 1979, “Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions,” Sage, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okrent, D., 1980, Comment on societal risk, Science, 208:372–375.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Okrent, David., ed., 1975, “Risk-Benefit Methodology and Applications: Some Papers Presented at the Engineering Foundation Workshop, Sept. 22–26, 1975, Asilomar, California,” National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA., (NSF-RA-X-75-029).

    Google Scholar 

  • Otway, Harry J., and Pahner, Phillip D., Apr. 1976, Risk assessment, Futures, 8:122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otway, Harry J., et al., Apr. 1978, Nuclear power: the question of public acceptance, Futures, 10:109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, Talbot, 1978, A generic view of toxic chemicals and similar risks, Ecology Law Quarterly, 7:207–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads, Steven E., Spring 1978, How much should we spend to save a life? Public Interest, 51:74–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, Chester R., 1980, “The Science of Risk Assessment: A Summary of a Seminar Presented on Aug. 9, 1979, Oak Ridge, Tenn.,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, (ORNL technical seminar series, ORNL/PPA-80/2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritch, John B., Jr., Aug. 1979, Protecting public health from toxic chemicals, Environ. Sci. Tech., 13:922–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, William D., Aug. 1977, Governmental regulation of societal risks, George Washington Law Rev., 45:944–968.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, William D., 1977, “An Anatomy of Risk,” Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sage, A., and White, E., Aug. 1980, Methodologies for risk and hazard assessment: a survey and status report, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., 10(8):425–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuels, Sheldon W., Oct. 1979, Role of scientific data in health decisions, Environ. Health Perspectives, 32:301–307.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schweig, Barry B., May 1979, Products liability problem, Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci., 443:94–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwing, Richard C., and Albers, Walter A., Jr., eds., 1980, “Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?” Proceedings of an international symposium held Oct. 8–9, 1979, at the General Motors Research Laboratories, Warren, MI., Plenum Press, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, Max, Spring, 1978, How to reduce risks rationally, Public Interest, 51:93–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjoberg, Lennart, 1979, Strength of belief and risk, Policy Sci., 11:39–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul, 1978, The psychology of protective behavior, J. Safety Res., 10:58–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, Paul, et al., 1979, Rating the risks, Environment, 21:14–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, K. A., Aug. 1980, “Issues and Problems in Inferring a Level of Acceptable Risk,” prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, The Rand Corporation, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Kenneth A., and Abraham, Stanley C., Mar. 1980, The index of harm: a useful measure for comparing occupational risk across industries, Health Phys., 38:375–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, Chauncey, 1969, Social benefit vs. technological risk, Science, 165:1232–1238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Starr, Chauncey, and Whipple, Chris, 1980, Risks of risk decisions, Science, 208:1114–1119.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, 1980, House of Representatives, Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations and Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce, “Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis by Regulatory Agencies,” Joint hearings, 96th Congress, 1st session, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress, 1980, House of Representatives, Committee on Science and Technology, Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology; Senate, Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Subcommittee on Science, Technology and Space; and the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Congress/Science Forum, “Risk/benefit analysis in the legislative process,” Joint hearings, 96th Congress, 1st session, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel, James W., Autumn 1976, Early death: an American tragedy, Law Contemp. Problems, 40:74–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaupel, James W., and Graham, John D., Winter 1980, Egg in your bier? Public Interest, 58:3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron, Jan./Feb. 1979, No risk is the highest risk of all, Am. Scientist, 67:32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron, Summer 1980, Richer is safer, Public Interest, 60:23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R., Feb. 1979, Analyzing the risks of daily life, Tech. Rev., pp. 45-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeckhauser, Richard, and Shepard, Donald, Autumn 1976, Where now for saving lives, Law Contemp. Problems, 40:5–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, Burke K., Feb. 1978, Risk-benefit analysis; the cop-out of government regulation, Trial, 14:43–47.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Covello, V., and Menkes, J., 1981, Issues in risk analysis, in: “Risk in the Technological Society,” C. Hohenemser and J. Kasperson, eds., Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr, K., 1977, Policy-makers’ use of social science knowledge: Symbolic or instrumental? in: “Using Social Research in Public Policy Making,” C. Weiss, ed., Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J., March 1980, Knowledge utilization: What is it? Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 1(3):421–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E., and Cohen, D. K., 1978, “Social Research in Social Problem Solving: The Issues,” Working paper No. 803, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, Laurence E., Caplan, N., Morrison, A., and Stambaugh, R. J., 1975, “The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions at the National Level,” Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C., 1977a, Research for policy’s sake: The enlightenment function of social research, Policy Analysis 3(4):531–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C., ed., 1977b, “Using Social Research in Public Policy Making,” Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C., 1978, Improving the linkage between social research and public policy, in: “The Use of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Decisions at the National Level.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurence E. Lynn, N. Caplan, A. Morrison, and R. J. Stambaugh (1975), Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, A., 1979, No risk is the highest risk of all, American Scientist, Vol. 67 (Jan.–Feb. 1979) pp. 32-37.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Policy Research and Analysis, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C., USA

    Vincent T. Covello

Authors
  1. Vincent T. Covello
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Large Scale Systems and Policy Analysis, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

    Yacov Y. Haimes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Covello, V.T. (1981). Technological Hazards, Risk, and Society: A Perspective on Risk Analysis Research. In: Haimes, Y.Y. (eds) Risk/Benefit Analysis in Water Resources Planning and Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2168-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2168-0_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2170-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2168-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation