Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Simplified Receivers

  • Chapter
Digital Phase Modulation

Part of the book series: Applications of Communications Theory ((ACTH))

  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

The optimum coherent receiver for CPM is described in Chapter 7. Its complexity grows exponentially in proportion to M L. In Chapter 8 we will present four different methods for constructing simplified suboptimum coherent receivers for CPM. We will see that their level of complexity, performance degradation, and degree of applicability are interconnected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Optimized Reduced-Complexity Viterbi Detectors for CPM, ” GLOBECOM’83, San Diego, California, November 1983, Conference Record, pp. 22.1.1-22.1.8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Svensson, C-E. Sundberg, and T, Aulin, “A Class of Reduced Complexity Viterbi Detectors for Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation, ” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-32(10), 1079–1087 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Svensson, C-E. Sundberg, and T. Aulin, “A Distance Measure for Simplified Receivers,” Electronics Letters 19(23), 953–954 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Aulin, C-E. Sundberg, and A. Svensson, “Viterbi Detectors with Reduced Complexity for Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation, ” National Telecommunications Conference, NTC’81, New Orleans, 1981, Conference Record, pp. A7.6.1-A7.6.7.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Aulin and C-E. Sundberg, “Continuous Phase Modulation—Part I: Full Response Signaling,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-29(3), 196–209 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. T. Aulin, N. Rydbeck, and C-E. Sundberg, “Continuous Phase Modulation—Part II: Partial Response Signaling,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-29(3), 210–225 (1981).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Aulin, “Three Papers on Continuous Phase Modulation (CPM), ” Dr. Techn. Thesis, University of Lund, November 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Aulin, N. Rydbeck, and C-E. Sundberg, “Transmitter and Receiver Structures for M-ary Partial Response FM, ” 1980 International Zürich Seminar on Digital Communications, Conference Record, pp. A.2.1-A.2.6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Rydbeck and C-E. Sundberg, “Recent Results on Spectrally Efficient Constant Envelope Digital Modulation Methods, ” International Conference on Communications, Boston 1979, ICC’79, Conference Record, pp. 42.1.1-42.1.6.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. de Jager and C. B. Dekker, “Tamed Frequency Modulation, A Novel Method to Achieve Spectrum Economy in Digital Transmission,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-26, 534–542 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Aulin and C-E. Sundberg, “An Easy Way to Calculate Power Spectrum for Digital FM,” IEE Proceedings, PtF: Communications, Radar and Signal Processing 130(6), 519–526 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. R. Fletcher and M. J. D. Powell, “A Rapidly Convergent Descent Method for Minimization,” Computer Journal 6(2), 163–168 (1963).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. S. J. Simmons and P. H. Wittke, “Low Complexity Decoders for Constant Envelope Digital Modulations, ” Global Telecommunications Conference, Miami, Florida, November 1982, Conference Record, pp. E7.7.1-E7.7.5.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Optimum MSK-Type Receivers for Partial Response CPM on Fading Channels, ” ICC’84, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, May 1984, Conference Record, pp. 933-936.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Svensson and C.-E. Sundberg, “Optimum MSK-Type Receivers for CPM on Gaussian and Rayleigh Fading Channels” IEE Prroceedings, Pt F 131(5), 480–490 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. Aulin, C-E. Sundberg, and A. Svensson, “MSK-Type Receivers for Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation, ” International Conference on Communications, ICC’82, Philadelphia, June 1982, Conference Record, pp. 6F.3.1-6F.3.6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C-E. Sundberg, “Error Probability of Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation with Coherent MSK-Type Receiver, Diversity and Slow Rayleigh Fading in Gaussian Noise,” The Bell System Technical journal 61(8), 1933–1963 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Serial Detection of Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation, ” Global Telecommunication Conference, GLOBECOM’83, San Diego, 1983, Conference Record, pp. 44.1.1-44.1.8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Galko and S. Pasupathy, “Optimal Linear Receiver Filters for Binary Digital Signals, ” International Conference on Communications, ICC’82, Philadelphia, June 1982, Conference Record, pp. 1H.6.1-1H.6.5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Galko and S. Pasupathy, “Linear Receivers for Generalized MSK, ” International Conference on Communications, ICC’82, Philadelphia, June 1982, Conference Record, pp. 6F.5.1-6F.5.6.

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Galko, “Generalized MSK,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada, August 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  22. S. A. Rhodes, “FSOQ, A New Modulation Technique that Yields a Constant Envelope, ” Natilnal Telecommunication Conference, NTC’80, Houston, 1980, Conference Record, pp. 51.1.1-51.1.7.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Murota and K. Hirade, “GMSK Modulation for Digital Mobile Radio Telephony,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-29(7), 1044–1050 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. R. de Buda, “Coherent Demodulation of Frequency Shift Keying with Low Deviation Ratio,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-20(3), 429–435 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. M. S. El-Tanany, J. S. Wight, and H. M. Hafez, “On Optimization of a Quadrature Coherent Detector for Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation with Modulation Index 1/2, ” Global Telecommunication Conference, GLOBECOM’82, Miami, 1982, Conference Record, pp. D7.2.1-D7.2.7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Serial MSK-Type Detection of Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-33(1), 44–52 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. R. W. Lucky, J. Salz, and E. J. Weldon Jr., Principles of Data Communication, McGraw-Hill, New York (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  28. F. Amoroso and J. A. Kivett, “Simplified MSK Signaling Technique,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-25(4), 433–441 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. M. Liebetreu and C. R. Ryan, “Performance Simulation of Receiver Filters for Serial Detection of MSK Signals, ” Allerton Conference Proa, October 1980, pp. 351-358.

    Google Scholar 

  30. R. E. Ziemer, C. R. Ryan, and J. H. Stilwell, “Conversion and Matched Filter Approximations for serial Minimum-Shift Keyed Modulation,” IEEE Transations on Communications COM-30(3), 495–509 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. C. R. Ryan, A. R. Hambley, and D. E. Vogt, “760 Mbit/s Serial MSK Microwave Modem,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-28(5), 771–777 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R. E. Ziemer and C. R. Ryan, “Near Optimum Delay-Line Detection Filters for Serial Detection of MSK Signals, ” International Conference on Communications, ICC’81, Denver, June 1981, Conference Record, pp. 56.2.1-56.2.5.

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. R. Ryan, “Advances in Serial MSK Modems, ” National Telecommunication Conference, NTC’81, New Orleans, December 1981, Conference Record, pp. G3.6.1-G3.6.5.

    Google Scholar 

  34. F. Amoroso, “Experimental Results on Constant Envelope Signaling with Reduced Spectral Sidelobes, ” International Conference on Communications, ICC’81, Denver, June 1981, Conference Record, pp. 47.1.1-47.1.5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. M. Wozencraft and I. M. Jacobs, Principles of Communication Engineering, Wiley, New York (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  36. T. Aulin and C-E. Sundberg, “Optimum and Sub-Optimum Detectors for Band and Amplitude Limited Continuous Phase Modulation, ” International Conference on Communications, ICC’83, Boston, 1983, Conference Record, pp. A6.1.1-A6.1.6.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Svensson, “Receivers for CPM,” Techn. Dr. Thesis, University of Lund, Lund, May 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  38. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Performance of AMF Receivers for CPM, ” GLOBECOM’84, Atlanta, Georgia, to be presented.

    Google Scholar 

  39. T. Aulin, C-E. Sundberg, and A. Svensson, “Modified Average Matched Filter Receivers for Partial Response CPM, ” Technical Report TR-151, June 1981, Telecommunication Theory, University of Lund. Presented at the International Symposium on Information Theory, Les Arcs, France, June 20–25, 1982. Book of Abstracts, p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  40. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Performance of Generalized AMF Receivers for Continuous Phase Modulation,” IEE Proceedings, Part F, 132(7), 541–547 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  41. A. Svensson and C-E. Sundberg, “Simulations of Coherent Average Matched Filter Receivers for Partial Response CPM, ” University of Lund, Telecommunication Theory, Technical Report TR-178, September 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  42. W. P. Osborne and M. B. Luntz, “Coherent and Noncoherent Detection of CPFSK,” IEEE Transaction on Communications COM-22, 1023–1034 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. W. Hirt and S. Pasupathy, “Suboptimal Reception of Binary Continuous Phase Shift Keying Signals,” September 1980, IEE Proceedings, Part F 128(3), 125–134 (1981).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. C-E. Sundberg and A. Svensson, “Parallel and Serial MSK-type Detection of Partial Response Continuous Phase Modulation, ” The 1983 Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, MELECON’83, Athens, Greece, Conference Record, p. B8.01.

    Google Scholar 

  45. S. Nanayakkara and J. B. Anderson, “High Speed Receiver Designs Based on Surface Acoustic Wave Devices, ” The Sixth International Conference on Digital Satellite Communications, Phoenix, Arizona, September 1983, Conference Proceedings, pp. VI-16-VI-22.

    Google Scholar 

  46. J. B. Anderson and S. Nanayakkara, “Surface Acoustic Wave Devices and the Design of Optimal High Speed Receivers, ” 1983 Internatioal Tirrenia Workshop on Digital Communications, Tirrenia (Pisa) 30th August-2 September 1983, Proceedings, pp. D3.1-D3.9.

    Google Scholar 

  47. T. Aulin, B. Persson, N. Rydbeck, and C-E. Sundberg, “Spectrally-Efficient Constant-Amplitude Digital Modulation Schemes for Communication Satellite Applications, ” May 1982, Study Report. European Space Agency—ESTEC, Contract 4765/81/NL/MD, Vol. I and Vol. II, in part published in Conference Proceedings, The Sixth International Conference on Digital Satellite Communications, Phoenix, Arizona, September 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  48. D. Muilwijk and J. H. Schadé, “Correlative Phase Modulation for Fixed Satellite Services, ” January 1983, Study Report, ESTEC 4485/80/NL/MS, Philips Telecommunicatie Industrie B.V., Hilversum, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  49. D. Muilwijk and J. H. Schadé, “Correlative Phase Modulation for Fixed Satellite Services, ” Supplementary Report, August 1983, ESTEC 44/80/NL/MS(SC), Philips’ Telecommunicatie Industrie B.V., Hilversum, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  50. S. Nanayakkara, J. B. Anderson, T. Aulin, and C-E. Sundberg, “Phase Coded Sinusoidal Signal Transmitter/Receiver Structure Including Saw Device-Based Structure, ” Vols. I and II, Final Report, Intelsat Contract No. INTEL-216, December 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  51. D. Muilwijk, “Correlative Phase Shift Keying—A Class of Constant Envelope Modulation Techniques,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-29(3), 226–236 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. J. B. Anderson and S. Mohan, “Sequential Coding Algorithms: A Survey and Cost Analysis,” IEEE Transactions on Communications COM-32, 169–176 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA

    John B. Anderson

  2. Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden

    Tor Aulin

  3. AT & T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, New Jersey, USA

    Carl-Erik Sundberg

Authors
  1. John B. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tor Aulin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Carl-Erik Sundberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, J.B., Aulin, T., Sundberg, CE. (1986). Simplified Receivers. In: Digital Phase Modulation. Applications of Communications Theory. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2031-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2031-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-2033-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-2031-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation