Skip to main content

Genetic Risk Estimation

  • Chapter

Abstract

The state of the art in risk estimation for genotoxic effects in humans was probably best summarized by Newcombe1:

little is known about the extent of the effect on health which a given increase in mutation rate would cause in man. This is true because of a lack of certainty about the amount of ill health that is maintained in the population by the pressure of recurrent natural mutations. Without such knowledge, the importance of exposures to known mutagens is difficult to assess quantitatively with a view to setting reasonable standards for the protection of the human gene pool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Newcombe, H. B.: Methods of obtaining epidemiological data for mutation risk estimation. In Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures (B. J. Kilbey, M. Legator, W. Nichols, and C. Ramel, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 461 - 476, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carter, C. O.: The relative contribution of mutant genes and chromosome abnormalities to genetic ill-health in man. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 114, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Russell, L. B.: Validation of the in vivo somatic mutation method in the mouse as a prescreen for germinal point mutations. Arch. Toxicol. 38: 75 - 85, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sankaranarayanan, K.: Protection against genetic hazards from environmental chemical mutagens: Experience with ionizing radiation. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 77 - 93, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hemminki, K., Sorsa, M., and Vainio H.: Genetic risks caused by occupational chemicals. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 5: 307 - 327, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sram, R. J., and Kuleshov, N. P.: Monitoring the occupational exposure to mutagens by the cytogenetic analysis of human peripheral lymphocytes in vivo. Arch. Toxicol. 1980 (Suppl. 4): 11 - 18, 1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bloom, A. D. (ed.): Guidelines for Studies of Human Populations Exposed to Mutagenic and Reproductive Hazards, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, New York, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products, and the Environment. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenicity, Department of Health and Social Security, Great Britain, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Matsunaga, E.: Perspectives in mutation epidemiology 1. Incidence and prevalence of genetic disease (excluding chromosomal aberrations) in human populations. Mutat. Res. 99: 95 - 128, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nebert, D. W., Levitt, R. C., and Pelkonen, O.: Genetic variation in metabolism of chemical carcinogens associated with susceptibility to tumorigenesis. In Carcinogens: Identification and Mechanisms of Action (A. C. Griffin and C. R. Shaw, eds.) Raven Press, New York, pp. 157 - 185, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Paterson, M. C.: Environmental carcinogenesis and imperfect repair of damaged DNA in Homo sapiens: Causal relation revealed by rare hereditary disorders. In Carcinogens: Identification and Mechanisms of Action (A. C. Griffen and C. R. Shaw, eds.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 251 - 276, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Generoso, W. M., Cain, K. I., and Bandy, A. J.: Some factors affecting the mutagenic response of mouse germ cells to chemicals. In Utilization of Mammalian Specific Locus Studies in Hazard Evaluation and Estimation of Genetic Risk (F. J. de Serres and W. Sheridan, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 227 - 239, 1983.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Baker, T. G.: Effects of ionizing radiations on mammalian oogenesis: A model for chemical effects. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 31 - 37, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobels, F. H.: The parallelogram: An indirect approach for the assessment of genetic risks from chemical mutagens. In Progress in Mutation Research, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 323 - 327, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, L. B., and Montgomery, C. S.: Supermutagenicity of ethylnitrosourea in the mouse spot test. Comparisons with methylnitrosourea and ethylnitrosourethane. Mutat. Res. 92: 193 - 204, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ames, B. N.: Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Science 221: 1256 - 1264, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shamberger, R. J., Corlett, C. L., Beaman, K. D., and Kasten, B. L.: Antioxidants reduce the mutagenic effect of malonaldehyde and 3-propiolactone. Part IX, Antioxidants and cancer. Mutat. Res. 66: 349 - 355, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abrahamson, S., Bender, M. A., Conger, A. D., and Wolff, S.: Uniformity of radiation-induced mutation rates among different species. Nature 245: 460 - 462, 1973.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Schalet, A. P., and Sankaranarayanan, K.: Evaluation and reevaluation of genetic radiation hazards in man. I. Interspecific comparison of estimates of mutation rates. Mutat. Res. 35: 341 - 370, 1976.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. National Academy of Sciences: Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Serres, F. J.: Report of the Conference on Modification of Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Activity. Mutat. Res. 54: 197 - 202, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sugimura, T.: Let’s be scientific about the problem of mutagens in cooked food. Mutat. Res. 55: 149 - 152, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Vogel, E.: The relation between mutational pattern and concentration by chemical mutagens in Drosophila. In Screening Tests in Chemical Carcinogenesis (H. Bartsch, R. Montesano, and L. Tomatis, eds.), IARC Scientific Publication No. 12, pp. 117 - 132, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dean, B. J., and Senner, K. R.: Detection of chemically-induced somatic mutation in Chinese hamsters. Mutat. Res. 46: 403 - 407, 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Dean, B. J., and Senner, K. R.: Detection of chemically-induced mutations in tissues of Chinese hamsters. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A., Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 201 - 206, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strauss, G. H., and Albertini, R. J.: 6 Thioguanine resistant lymphocytes in human peripheral blood. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 327 - 334, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Russell, L. B., and Major, M. H.: Radiation-induced presumed somatic mutations in the mouse. Genetics 42: 161 - 175, 1957.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Russell, L. B.: Somatic cells as indicators of germinal mutations in the mouse. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 113 - 116, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Styles, J. A., and Penman, M. P.: The mouse spot test: An appraisal of its performance in detecting chemical carcinogens and mutagens. Mutat. Res. 154: 183 - 204, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fabro, S.: Penetration of chemicals into the oocyte, uterine fluid, and preimplantation blastocyst. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 25 - 29, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Loveless, A.: Possible relevance of 06 alkylation of deoxyguanosine to the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of nitrosamines and nitrosamides. Nature 223: 206, 1969.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mailing, H. V., and Valcovic, L. R.: New approaches to detection of gene mutations in mammals. In Advances in Modern Toxicology, Vol. 4 (G Flamm and M. Mehlman, eds.), Hemisphere Press, New York, pp. 149 - 171, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  33. ICPEMC, Committee 4 Final Report. Estimation of genetic risks and increased incidence of genetic disease due to environmental mutagens. Mutat. Res. 115: 255 - 291 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ehling, U. H.: Induction of gene mutations in germ cells of the mouse. Arch. Toxicol. 46: 123 - 138, 1980.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ehling, U. H.: Risk estimations based on germ-cell mutations in mice. In Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental Mutagens) (T. Sugimura, S. Kondo, and H. Takebe, eds.), University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, and Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 709 - 719, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Russell, L. B., Selby, P. B., vanHalle, E., Sheridan, W., and Valcovic, L.: The mouse specific locus test with agents other than radiations: Interpretation of data and recommendations for future work. Mutat. Res. 86: 329 - 354, 1981.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kratochvilova, J., and Ehling, U. H.: Dominant cataract mutations induced by ’y-irradiation of male mice. Mutat. Res. 63: 221 - 223, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Selby, P. B., and Lee, S. S.: Sensitive-indicator results show that ethylnitrosurea is also a super mutagen for dominant skeletal mutations. Environ. Mutagen. 3: 373, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Adler, I. D.: Comparison of types of chemically induced genetic changes in mammals. Mutat. Res. 115: 293 - 321, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Generoso, W., Huff, S. W., and Cain, K. T.: Relative rates at which dominant-lethal mutations and heritable translocations were induced by alkylating chemicals in post-meiotic male germ cells of mice. Genetics 93: 163 - 171, 1979.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Russell, L. B., Aaron, C. S., de Serres, F., Generoso, W. M., Karman, K. L., Shelby, M., Springer, J., and Voytek, P.: Evaluation of mutagenicity assays for purposes of genetic risk assessment. Mutat. Res. 134: 143 - 157, 1984.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Lewtas, J.: A quantitative cancer risk assessment methodology using short-term genetic bioassays: The comparative potency method. In Risk and Reason: Risk Assessment in Relation to Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (P. Oftedal and A. Brogger, eds.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 107 - 120, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cuddihy, R. G., McClellan, R. 0., and Griffith, W. C.: Variability in target organ deposition among individuals exposed to toxic substances. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 49: 179 - 187, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, I. P., and Dixon, R. L.: Factors influencing reproduction and genetic toxic effects on male gonads. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 117 - 127, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee, W. R.: Dosimetry of chemical mutagens in eukaryote germ cells. In Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection, Vol. 5 (A. Hollaender and F. J. de Serres, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 177 - 202, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Russell, W. L., Huff, S. W., and Gottlieb, D. J.: The insignificant rate of induction of specific locus mutations by five alkylating agents that produce high incidences of dominant lethality. Biol. Div. Annu. Prog. Rep. ORNL 4535: 122 - 123, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Würgler, F. E., Sobels, F. H., and Vogel, E.: Drosophila as assay system for detecting genetic changes. In Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures (B. Kilbey, C. Ramel, M. Legator, and W. Nichols, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 335 - 373, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Mekler, P. H., Delehanty, J. T., Lohman, P. H. M., Brower, J., Putte, P. V. D., Pearson, P., Pouwels, P. H., and Ramel, C.: The use of recombinant DNA technology to study gene alteration. Mutat. Res. 153: 13 - 55, 1985.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Committee for a Study on Saccharin and Food Safety Policy: Saccharin: Technical Assessment of Risks and Benefits, Report No. 1, Assembly of Life Sciences/Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C., November 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wilson, J. G.: Environment and Birth Defects, Academic Press, New York, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Meselson, M., and Russell, K.: Comparisons of carcinogenic and mutagenic potency. In Origins of Human Cancer, Book C, Human Risk Assessment, Vol. 4 (H. H., Hiatt, J. D. Watson, and J. A. Winsten, eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp. 1473 - 1481, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Clive, D., Johnson, K. O., Spector, J. F. S., Batson, A. G., and Brown, M. M. M.: Validation and characterization of the L5178Y/TK +/- mouse lymphoma mutagen assay system. Mutat. Res. 59: 61 - 108, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ashby, J., and Styles, J. A.: Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay? Nature 271: 452 - 455, 1978.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Mount, D. W., Little, J. W., Markham, B., Ginsburg, H., Yanish, C., and Edmonston, S.: Mechanisms of mutagenesis in bacteria. In Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (T. Sugimura, S. Kondo, and H. Takebe, eds.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 105 - 111, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Brash, D. E., and Hart, R. W.: DNA damage and repair in vivo. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 2: 79 - 114, 1978.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Brash, D. E., and Hart, R. W.: Biopsy measurement of DNA damage and repair in vivo: Single-strand breaks, alkali-labile bonds, and endonuclease-sensitive sites. Radiat. Res. 91: 169 - 180, 1982.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Hart, R. W., Fu, P., and Chang, M. J. W.: Comparative removal of PAH adducts in vivo. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Symposium on Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Batelle’s Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Myhr, B., Turnbull, D., and DiPaolo, J. A.: Ultraviolet mutagenesis of normal and xeroderma pigmentosum variant human fibroblasts. Mutat. Res. 62 (2): 341 - 353, 1979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Seiler, J. P.: Apparent and real thresholds: A study on two mutagens. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/ North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 233 - 238, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ehling, U. H., Auerbeck, D., Cerutti, P. A., Friedman, J., Greim, H., Kolbye, A. C., and Mendelsohn, M. L.: Review of the evidence of thresholds in the induction of genetic effects by genotoxic chemicals. Mutat. Res. 123: 281 - 341, 1983.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Brusick, D., de Serres, F. J., Everson, R. B., Mendelsohn, M. L., Neel, J. V., Shelby, M. D., and Waters, M. D.: Monitoring the human population for mutations and DNA damage. In Guidelines for Studies of Human Populations Exposed to Mutagenic and Reproductive Hazards (A. D. Bloom, ed.), March of Dimes Foundation, New York, pp. 111 - 140, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  62. A. D. Woodhead, C. J. Shellabarger, V. Pond, and A. Hollaender (eds.): Assessment of Risk from Low-Level Exposure to Radiation and Chemicals, Plenum Press, New York, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brusick, D. (1987). Genetic Risk Estimation. In: Principles of Genetic Toxicology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1980-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1980-9_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1982-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1980-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics