Abstract
The state of the art in risk estimation for genotoxic effects in humans was probably best summarized by Newcombe1:
little is known about the extent of the effect on health which a given increase in mutation rate would cause in man. This is true because of a lack of certainty about the amount of ill health that is maintained in the population by the pressure of recurrent natural mutations. Without such knowledge, the importance of exposures to known mutagens is difficult to assess quantitatively with a view to setting reasonable standards for the protection of the human gene pool.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Newcombe, H. B.: Methods of obtaining epidemiological data for mutation risk estimation. In Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures (B. J. Kilbey, M. Legator, W. Nichols, and C. Ramel, eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 461 - 476, 1977.
Carter, C. O.: The relative contribution of mutant genes and chromosome abnormalities to genetic ill-health in man. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 114, 1977.
Russell, L. B.: Validation of the in vivo somatic mutation method in the mouse as a prescreen for germinal point mutations. Arch. Toxicol. 38: 75 - 85, 1977.
Sankaranarayanan, K.: Protection against genetic hazards from environmental chemical mutagens: Experience with ionizing radiation. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 77 - 93, 1977.
Hemminki, K., Sorsa, M., and Vainio H.: Genetic risks caused by occupational chemicals. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 5: 307 - 327, 1979.
Sram, R. J., and Kuleshov, N. P.: Monitoring the occupational exposure to mutagens by the cytogenetic analysis of human peripheral lymphocytes in vivo. Arch. Toxicol. 1980 (Suppl. 4): 11 - 18, 1980.
Bloom, A. D. (ed.): Guidelines for Studies of Human Populations Exposed to Mutagenic and Reproductive Hazards, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, New York, 1981.
Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products, and the Environment. Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenicity, Department of Health and Social Security, Great Britain, 1979.
Matsunaga, E.: Perspectives in mutation epidemiology 1. Incidence and prevalence of genetic disease (excluding chromosomal aberrations) in human populations. Mutat. Res. 99: 95 - 128, 1982.
Nebert, D. W., Levitt, R. C., and Pelkonen, O.: Genetic variation in metabolism of chemical carcinogens associated with susceptibility to tumorigenesis. In Carcinogens: Identification and Mechanisms of Action (A. C. Griffin and C. R. Shaw, eds.) Raven Press, New York, pp. 157 - 185, 1979.
Paterson, M. C.: Environmental carcinogenesis and imperfect repair of damaged DNA in Homo sapiens: Causal relation revealed by rare hereditary disorders. In Carcinogens: Identification and Mechanisms of Action (A. C. Griffen and C. R. Shaw, eds.), Raven Press, New York, pp. 251 - 276, 1979.
Generoso, W. M., Cain, K. I., and Bandy, A. J.: Some factors affecting the mutagenic response of mouse germ cells to chemicals. In Utilization of Mammalian Specific Locus Studies in Hazard Evaluation and Estimation of Genetic Risk (F. J. de Serres and W. Sheridan, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 227 - 239, 1983.
Baker, T. G.: Effects of ionizing radiations on mammalian oogenesis: A model for chemical effects. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 31 - 37, 1978.
Sobels, F. H.: The parallelogram: An indirect approach for the assessment of genetic risks from chemical mutagens. In Progress in Mutation Research, Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 323 - 327, 1982.
Russell, L. B., and Montgomery, C. S.: Supermutagenicity of ethylnitrosourea in the mouse spot test. Comparisons with methylnitrosourea and ethylnitrosourethane. Mutat. Res. 92: 193 - 204, 1982.
Ames, B. N.: Dietary carcinogens and anticarcinogens. Science 221: 1256 - 1264, 1983.
Shamberger, R. J., Corlett, C. L., Beaman, K. D., and Kasten, B. L.: Antioxidants reduce the mutagenic effect of malonaldehyde and 3-propiolactone. Part IX, Antioxidants and cancer. Mutat. Res. 66: 349 - 355, 1979.
Abrahamson, S., Bender, M. A., Conger, A. D., and Wolff, S.: Uniformity of radiation-induced mutation rates among different species. Nature 245: 460 - 462, 1973.
Schalet, A. P., and Sankaranarayanan, K.: Evaluation and reevaluation of genetic radiation hazards in man. I. Interspecific comparison of estimates of mutation rates. Mutat. Res. 35: 341 - 370, 1976.
National Academy of Sciences: Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1983.
De Serres, F. J.: Report of the Conference on Modification of Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Activity. Mutat. Res. 54: 197 - 202, 1978.
Sugimura, T.: Let’s be scientific about the problem of mutagens in cooked food. Mutat. Res. 55: 149 - 152, 1978.
Vogel, E.: The relation between mutational pattern and concentration by chemical mutagens in Drosophila. In Screening Tests in Chemical Carcinogenesis (H. Bartsch, R. Montesano, and L. Tomatis, eds.), IARC Scientific Publication No. 12, pp. 117 - 132, 1976.
Dean, B. J., and Senner, K. R.: Detection of chemically-induced somatic mutation in Chinese hamsters. Mutat. Res. 46: 403 - 407, 1977.
Dean, B. J., and Senner, K. R.: Detection of chemically-induced mutations in tissues of Chinese hamsters. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A., Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 201 - 206, 1977.
Strauss, G. H., and Albertini, R. J.: 6 Thioguanine resistant lymphocytes in human peripheral blood. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 327 - 334, 1977.
Russell, L. B., and Major, M. H.: Radiation-induced presumed somatic mutations in the mouse. Genetics 42: 161 - 175, 1957.
Russell, L. B.: Somatic cells as indicators of germinal mutations in the mouse. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 113 - 116, 1978.
Styles, J. A., and Penman, M. P.: The mouse spot test: An appraisal of its performance in detecting chemical carcinogens and mutagens. Mutat. Res. 154: 183 - 204, 1985.
Fabro, S.: Penetration of chemicals into the oocyte, uterine fluid, and preimplantation blastocyst. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 25 - 29, 1978.
Loveless, A.: Possible relevance of 06 alkylation of deoxyguanosine to the mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of nitrosamines and nitrosamides. Nature 223: 206, 1969.
Mailing, H. V., and Valcovic, L. R.: New approaches to detection of gene mutations in mammals. In Advances in Modern Toxicology, Vol. 4 (G Flamm and M. Mehlman, eds.), Hemisphere Press, New York, pp. 149 - 171, 1978.
ICPEMC, Committee 4 Final Report. Estimation of genetic risks and increased incidence of genetic disease due to environmental mutagens. Mutat. Res. 115: 255 - 291 (1983).
Ehling, U. H.: Induction of gene mutations in germ cells of the mouse. Arch. Toxicol. 46: 123 - 138, 1980.
Ehling, U. H.: Risk estimations based on germ-cell mutations in mice. In Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental Mutagens) (T. Sugimura, S. Kondo, and H. Takebe, eds.), University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, and Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 709 - 719, 1982.
Russell, L. B., Selby, P. B., vanHalle, E., Sheridan, W., and Valcovic, L.: The mouse specific locus test with agents other than radiations: Interpretation of data and recommendations for future work. Mutat. Res. 86: 329 - 354, 1981.
Kratochvilova, J., and Ehling, U. H.: Dominant cataract mutations induced by ’y-irradiation of male mice. Mutat. Res. 63: 221 - 223, 1979.
Selby, P. B., and Lee, S. S.: Sensitive-indicator results show that ethylnitrosurea is also a super mutagen for dominant skeletal mutations. Environ. Mutagen. 3: 373, 1981.
Adler, I. D.: Comparison of types of chemically induced genetic changes in mammals. Mutat. Res. 115: 293 - 321, 1983.
Generoso, W., Huff, S. W., and Cain, K. T.: Relative rates at which dominant-lethal mutations and heritable translocations were induced by alkylating chemicals in post-meiotic male germ cells of mice. Genetics 93: 163 - 171, 1979.
Russell, L. B., Aaron, C. S., de Serres, F., Generoso, W. M., Karman, K. L., Shelby, M., Springer, J., and Voytek, P.: Evaluation of mutagenicity assays for purposes of genetic risk assessment. Mutat. Res. 134: 143 - 157, 1984.
Lewtas, J.: A quantitative cancer risk assessment methodology using short-term genetic bioassays: The comparative potency method. In Risk and Reason: Risk Assessment in Relation to Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (P. Oftedal and A. Brogger, eds.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 107 - 120, 1986.
Cuddihy, R. G., McClellan, R. 0., and Griffith, W. C.: Variability in target organ deposition among individuals exposed to toxic substances. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 49: 179 - 187, 1979.
Lee, I. P., and Dixon, R. L.: Factors influencing reproduction and genetic toxic effects on male gonads. Environ. Health Perspect. 24: 117 - 127, 1978.
Lee, W. R.: Dosimetry of chemical mutagens in eukaryote germ cells. In Chemical Mutagens: Principles and Methods for Their Detection, Vol. 5 (A. Hollaender and F. J. de Serres, eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 177 - 202, 1978.
Russell, W. L., Huff, S. W., and Gottlieb, D. J.: The insignificant rate of induction of specific locus mutations by five alkylating agents that produce high incidences of dominant lethality. Biol. Div. Annu. Prog. Rep. ORNL 4535: 122 - 123, 1969.
Würgler, F. E., Sobels, F. H., and Vogel, E.: Drosophila as assay system for detecting genetic changes. In Handbook of Mutagenicity Test Procedures (B. Kilbey, C. Ramel, M. Legator, and W. Nichols, eds.), Elsevier/North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 335 - 373, 1977.
Mekler, P. H., Delehanty, J. T., Lohman, P. H. M., Brower, J., Putte, P. V. D., Pearson, P., Pouwels, P. H., and Ramel, C.: The use of recombinant DNA technology to study gene alteration. Mutat. Res. 153: 13 - 55, 1985.
Committee for a Study on Saccharin and Food Safety Policy: Saccharin: Technical Assessment of Risks and Benefits, Report No. 1, Assembly of Life Sciences/Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C., November 1978.
Wilson, J. G.: Environment and Birth Defects, Academic Press, New York, 1973.
Meselson, M., and Russell, K.: Comparisons of carcinogenic and mutagenic potency. In Origins of Human Cancer, Book C, Human Risk Assessment, Vol. 4 (H. H., Hiatt, J. D. Watson, and J. A. Winsten, eds.), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, pp. 1473 - 1481, 1977.
Clive, D., Johnson, K. O., Spector, J. F. S., Batson, A. G., and Brown, M. M. M.: Validation and characterization of the L5178Y/TK +/- mouse lymphoma mutagen assay system. Mutat. Res. 59: 61 - 108, 1979.
Ashby, J., and Styles, J. A.: Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay? Nature 271: 452 - 455, 1978.
Mount, D. W., Little, J. W., Markham, B., Ginsburg, H., Yanish, C., and Edmonston, S.: Mechanisms of mutagenesis in bacteria. In Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens (T. Sugimura, S. Kondo, and H. Takebe, eds.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 105 - 111, 1982.
Brash, D. E., and Hart, R. W.: DNA damage and repair in vivo. J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. 2: 79 - 114, 1978.
Brash, D. E., and Hart, R. W.: Biopsy measurement of DNA damage and repair in vivo: Single-strand breaks, alkali-labile bonds, and endonuclease-sensitive sites. Radiat. Res. 91: 169 - 180, 1982.
Hart, R. W., Fu, P., and Chang, M. J. W.: Comparative removal of PAH adducts in vivo. In Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Symposium on Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Batelle’s Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio, 1982.
Myhr, B., Turnbull, D., and DiPaolo, J. A.: Ultraviolet mutagenesis of normal and xeroderma pigmentosum variant human fibroblasts. Mutat. Res. 62 (2): 341 - 353, 1979.
Seiler, J. P.: Apparent and real thresholds: A study on two mutagens. In Progress in Genetic Toxicology, Vol. 2 (D. Scott, B. A. Bridges, and F. H. Sobels, eds.), Elsevier/ North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 233 - 238, 1977.
Ehling, U. H., Auerbeck, D., Cerutti, P. A., Friedman, J., Greim, H., Kolbye, A. C., and Mendelsohn, M. L.: Review of the evidence of thresholds in the induction of genetic effects by genotoxic chemicals. Mutat. Res. 123: 281 - 341, 1983.
Brusick, D., de Serres, F. J., Everson, R. B., Mendelsohn, M. L., Neel, J. V., Shelby, M. D., and Waters, M. D.: Monitoring the human population for mutations and DNA damage. In Guidelines for Studies of Human Populations Exposed to Mutagenic and Reproductive Hazards (A. D. Bloom, ed.), March of Dimes Foundation, New York, pp. 111 - 140, 1981.
A. D. Woodhead, C. J. Shellabarger, V. Pond, and A. Hollaender (eds.): Assessment of Risk from Low-Level Exposure to Radiation and Chemicals, Plenum Press, New York, 1985.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brusick, D. (1987). Genetic Risk Estimation. In: Principles of Genetic Toxicology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1980-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1980-9_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1982-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1980-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive