Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can Resident Participation in Neighborhood Rehabilitation Programs Succeed?

Israel’s Project Renewal Through a Comparative Perspective

  • Chapter
Neighborhood and Community Environments

Part of the book series: Human Behavior and Environment ((HUBE,volume 9))

Abstract

Citizen participation and neighborhood rehabilitation have received considerable attention in the last two decades and, to a large extent, have been inextricably linked. It is in the context of neighborhood rehabilitation that citizen involvement has been most implemented, most prominent, and most controversial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahlbrandt, R., & Cunningham, J. (1979). A new public policy for neighborhood preservation. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R. (1982). Planning for public participation: The design of implementable strategies. Environment and Planning B, 9, 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R., Churchman, A., & Law-Yone, H. (1981). A handbook for public participation in planning. Haifa: Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Center for Urban & Regional Studies (in Hebrew).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alterman, R., & Frenkel, A. (1985). Implementation of project outputs: Services provided and their beneficiaries. In R. Alterman, N. Carmon, & M. Hill (Eds.), Comprehensive evaluation of Israel’s Project Renewal (Vol. 3). Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. (1983). Case studies of citizen action and citizen participation in Brussels, Covent Garden, Delft and Camden. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 69–118). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armistead, J., Fainstein, S., & Fainstein, N. (1980). Community development block grants: Citizen participation and the representation of interests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Neighborhood Organization Research Group, Washington DC, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmon, Y. (1983). Lower class protest movements in Israel. Paper presented at the Jerusalem Institute Seminar, “The Welfare State and its Aftermath,” Jerusalem, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bachelor, L., & Jones, B. (1981). Managed participation: Detroit’s neighborhood opportunity fund. Journal of Applied and Behavioral Science, 17(4), 518–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baroni, G. (1983). The neighborhood movement in the United States: From the I960’s to the present. In P. Clay & R. Hollister (Eds.), Neighborhood policy and planning (pp. 177-192). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel, A., Grieff, R., & Muhlich, E. (1978). Resident’s participation in revitalization of housing areas. Darmstadt, Germany: Institut Wohnen und Umwelt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1977). User participation, personalization and environmental meaning: Three field studies. Ithaca: Cornell University, Program in Urban and Regional Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brager, G., & Specht, H. (1973). Community organizing. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruston, A. (1980). Citizen participation in planning and programming. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Housing, Building and Planning. Doc. HBP/SEM. 26/R.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, E. (1968). Citizen participation strategies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34(5), 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, A. (1985). Resident involvement and participation in Project Renewal. In R. Alter-man, N. Carmon, & M. Hill (Eds.), Comprehensive evaluation of Israel’s Project Renewal (Vol. 2). Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, A., Alterman, R., & Law-Yone, H. (1979). Public participation in Israel. On Participation, Issue 8, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. (1974). Citizen participation and the urban policy process. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Housing, Building and Planning (1980). Report of the seminar on citizen participation in the planning, implementation and management of human settlements. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, Doc. HBP/SEM, 26/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1981). Neighborhoods and urban development. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draisen, M. (1983). Fostering effective citizen participation: Lessons from three urban renewal neighborhoods in the Hague. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 239–290). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. (n. d.) Evaluating citizen participation: Illustrations from the European experience. Unpublished document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagence, M. (1977). Citizen participation in planning. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, N., & Fainstein, S. (1974). Urban political movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, N., Fainstein, S., & Armistead, P. J. (1979). Citizen participation in the Community Development Grant Program: Dimensions of analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, School of Public and Urban Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finlayson, K. (1978). The role of community involvement in low income housing. Man-Environment Systems, 8(3), 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. (1984). Neighborhood organizing: Lessons from the past. Social Policy, 15(1), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1984). Cognitive social learning variables and participation in community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 689–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, B., & Kaplan, M. (1975). The politics of neglect: Urban aid from Model Cities to revenue sharing. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedgut, T. (1979). Political participation in the U.S.S.R. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, J. (1979). Citizen participation in planning: The relationship between objectives and techniques. APA Journal April, 180-189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, J. (1978). Social technologies of freedom. In C. Bezold (Ed.), Anticipatory democracy (pp. 251–275). New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godschalk, D., & Zeisel, J. (1983). Coproducing urban renewal in the Netherlands. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 291–342). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallman, H. (1973). The neighborhood as an organizational unit: A historical perspective. In G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s (pp. 123-128). New York: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harloe, M. (1982). Housing and the market. In G. Hellstin, F. Spreer, & H. Wollman (Eds.), Applied Urban Research. Bonn: Federal Research Institute for Regional Geography and Regional Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, I. (1984). The citizens’ coalition in Milwaukee. Social Policy, 15(1), 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskell, C. (1980). Public funding of neighborhood organizations: A preliminary exploration. Paper prepared for the International Conference on Neighborhoods, Florence, Italy, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. (1983). Neighborhood policy: An alternative to the dominant conception of neighborhoods. In P. Clay & R. Hollister (Eds.), Neighborhood policy and planning. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jajszczyk, R., & Hlebowicz, J. (1980). Citizen participation in the management of settlements. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Housing, Building & Planning. Doc. HBP/Sem. 26/R.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. (1973). National strategies for neighborhood control and citizen participation. In G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s (pp. 179–194). New York: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., & Associates. (1978). Citizen participation in local development: A catalog of local approaches. Washington DC: Dept. of Housing & Development, Office of Policy Development & Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R. (1977). Participation through centrally planned social change: Lessons from the American experience on the urban scene. In W. R. Sewell & J. T. Coppock (Eds.), Public policy in planning (pp. 173-190). London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson, R., & Breitbart, M. (1974). Participation, decentralization and advocacy planning (Association of American Geographers Resource Paper No. 25). Washington DC: Commission on College Geography.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kweit, M., & Kweit, R. (1981). Implementing citizen participation in a bureaucratic society. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberger, H. (1980). The trend toward citizens’ participation in the welfare state: Countervailing power to the professions. In C. Foster (Ed.), Comparative public policy and citizen participation. Energy, education, health and urban issues in the United States and Germany (pp. 228-243). New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, S. (1978). Citizen participation in America: Current reflections on the state of the art. In S. Langton (Ed.), Citizen participation in America (pp. 1–12). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamalis, M. (1983). Housing’ the Co-op’ way. Architectural Psychology Newsletter, 13(2 & 3), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J. (1973). Two Model Cities: Negotiations in Oakland. In G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s (pp. 217–246). New York: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvihill, R. (1980). Citizen participation in the management of human settlements. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Housing, Building & Planning. Doc. HBP/Sem. 26/R.6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. (1985). Citizen participation, via tenants associations, in Swedish housing rehabilitation. Participation Network, Issue 3, March 6-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. (1975). Birmingham: Participatory urban renewal. The Planner, 61, 93–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, J. (1983). Citizen action and participation in Madrid. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 207–238). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlman, J., & Spiegel, H. (1983). Copenhagen’s Black Quadrant: The facade and reality of participation. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 35–68). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitkin, H. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, J. (1973). Foreign aid and urban aid. In G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s (pp. 139-164). New York: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakodi, C. (1983). The World Bank experience: Mass community participation in the Lusaka squatter upgrading project. In C. Moser (Ed.), Evaluating community participation in urban development projects (pp. 18-33). London: Bartlett School of Architecture & Planning Development Planning Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, J. (1978a). Citizen participation: Can we measure its effectiveness? Public Administration Review, 38, 457–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosener, J. (1978b). Matching method to purpose: The challenge of planning citizen participation activities. In S. Langton (Ed.), Citizen participation in America (pp. 109-122). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmandt, H. (1973). Decentralization: A structural imperative. In G. Frederickson (Ed.), Neighborhood control in the 1970s (pp. 17–36). New York: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, L. J. (1979). Decentralist trends in Western democracies, a first appraisal. In L. J. Sharpe (Ed.), Decentralist trends in Western democracies (pp. 9–80). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimshoni, D. (1983). Renewal and the management of innovation. Preliminary summary submitted to the International Evaluation Committee, unpublished document, Herzliya.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel, H., & Perlman, J. (1983). Docklands and Coventry. Two citizen action groups in Britain’s economically declining areas. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 125–156). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegman, M. (1979). Neighborhood classification and the role of the planner in seriously distressed communities, APA Journal, October, 495-505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, L., & Elliott, M. (1983). Paternalism, conflict and coproduction. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 3–34). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trapero, J. (1980). Citizen participation in implementation. New York: United Nations, Economic Commission for Europe, Committee on Housing, Building & Planning, HBP/Sem. 26/R.5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, D., & Wandersman, A. (1983). Neighboring and its role in block organizations: An exploratory report. American Journal of Community Psychology, 11(3), 291–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. Political participation and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk, F. (1983). Citizen participation in the Netherlands: Some comments. In L. Susskind & M. Elliott (Eds.), Paternalism, conflict and coproduction (pp. 343–350). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. (1978, August). Participation: A strategy of human-environment optimization. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. (1979). User participation in planning environments: A conceptual framework. Environment and Behavior, 11(4), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. (1984). Citizen participation. In K. Heller, R. Price, S. Reinharz, S. Riger, & A. Wandersman (Eds.), Psychology and community change: Challenges of the future (2nd ed., pp. 337–379) Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A., Jakubs, J., & Giamartino, G. (1981). Participation in block organizations. Journal of Community Action, 1 (September/October) 40-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R., & Warren, D. (1977). The neighborhood organizer’s handbook. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooley, T. (1985). Community architecture: An assessment of the case for user participation in design. In S. Klein, R. Wener, & S. Lehman (Eds.), EDRA 16/1985 (pp. 150-156). Washington, DC: EDRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawadzki, S. (1974). Basic trends of international studies on public participation in local power. In F. Bruhns, F. Cazzola, & J. Wiatr (Eds.), Local politics, development and participation. Pittsburgh: University Center for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Samuel Neaman Institute for Advanced Studies in Science and Technology and the Faculty of Architecture and Town Planning, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel

    Arza Churchman

Authors
  1. Arza Churchman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

    Irwin Altman

  2. University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA

    Abraham Wandersman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Churchman, A. (1987). Can Resident Participation in Neighborhood Rehabilitation Programs Succeed?. In: Altman, I., Wandersman, A. (eds) Neighborhood and Community Environments. Human Behavior and Environment, vol 9. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1962-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1962-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1964-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1962-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation