Skip to main content

Plant and station availability

  • Chapter

Abstract

The models used in Chapters 2–6 represented generating units by a single component, the reliability indices of which were convolved together to form the generation model for evaluating system risk. This single-component representation is necessary in the assessment of large systems in order to reduce both computer time and computer storage. Each of these single components, however, represents a system of its own, the composition of which has a marked effect on the unit availability. A separate reliability evaluation of the generating plant is therefore desirable for two reasons:

  1. (a)

    The reliability of a given generating plant configuration can be evaluated using historical component data. This index can then be used in the evaluation techniques described in Chapters 2–6.

  2. (b)

    Comparative studies can be made of alternative generating plant configurations in order to assess the economic benefits of these alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, R. N., Billinton, R., de Oliveira, M. F., ‘Reliability evaluation of the electrical auxiliary systems of power stations’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-96 (1977), pp. 1441–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allan, R. N., de Oliveira, M. R, Billinton, R., ‘Evaluating the reliability of auxiliary electrical systems of generating stations’, CEA Trans. (1976), 15, pt 3, paper 76-T-226.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allan, R. N., de Oliveira, M. F., Chambers, J. A., Billinton, R., ‘Reliability effects of the electrical auxiliary systems in power stations’, IEE Conf. Publ 148 (1977), pp. 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allan, R. N., de Oliveira, M. F., Kozlowski, A., Williams, G. T., ‘Evaluating the reliability of electrical auxiliary systems in multi-unit generating stations’, Proc. IEE, 127, pt C (1980), pp. 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, A. E., Bourne, A. J., Reliability Technology, John Wiley (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Allan, R. N., Rondiris, I. L., Fryer, D. M., Tye, C., Computational Development of Event Trees in Nuclear Reactor Systems, Second National Reliability Conference, Birmingham, UK, March 1979, paper 3D/1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Allan, R. N., Rondiris, I. L., Fryer, D. M., ‘An efficient computational technique for evaluating the cut/tie sets and common-cause failures of complex systems’, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, R-30 (1981), pp. 101–9.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh, C., Patton, A.D., ‘Protection system reliability modelling; unreadiness probability and mean duration of undetected faults’, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, R-29 (1980), pp. 339–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heising, C. R., Ringlee, R. J., ‘Prediction of reliability and availability of HVDC valve and HVDC terminal’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-89 (1970), pp. 619–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Billinton, R., Sachdev, M. S., ‘Direct current transmission system reliability evaluation’, CEA Trans., 7, pt 3 (1968), paper 68-SP-170.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Billinton, R., Prasad, V, ‘Quantitative reliability analysis of HVDC transmission systems: I—Spare valve assessment in mercury arc bridge configurations’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-90 (1971), pp. 103–46.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Billinton, R., Prasad, V., ‘Quantitative reliability analysis of HVDC transmission systems: II—Composite system analysis’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-90 (1971), pp. 1047–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Billinton, R., Jain, A. V., ‘Unit derating levels in spinning reserve studies’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-90 (1971), pp. 1677–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Allan, R. N., Adraktas, A. N., Terminal Effects and Protection System Failures in Composite System Reliability Evaluation, Paper No. 82 SM 428–1, presented at the IEEE Summer Power Meeting, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Billinton, R., Allan, R.N. (1996). Plant and station availability. In: Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1860-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1860-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1862-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1860-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics