Abstract
The models used in Chapters 2–6 represented generating units by a single component, the reliability indices of which were convolved together to form the generation model for evaluating system risk. This single-component representation is necessary in the assessment of large systems in order to reduce both computer time and computer storage. Each of these single components, however, represents a system of its own, the composition of which has a marked effect on the unit availability. A separate reliability evaluation of the generating plant is therefore desirable for two reasons:
-
(a)
The reliability of a given generating plant configuration can be evaluated using historical component data. This index can then be used in the evaluation techniques described in Chapters 2–6.
-
(b)
Comparative studies can be made of alternative generating plant configurations in order to assess the economic benefits of these alternatives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allan, R. N., Billinton, R., de Oliveira, M. F., ‘Reliability evaluation of the electrical auxiliary systems of power stations’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-96 (1977), pp. 1441–9.
Allan, R. N., de Oliveira, M. R, Billinton, R., ‘Evaluating the reliability of auxiliary electrical systems of generating stations’, CEA Trans. (1976), 15, pt 3, paper 76-T-226.
Allan, R. N., de Oliveira, M. F., Chambers, J. A., Billinton, R., ‘Reliability effects of the electrical auxiliary systems in power stations’, IEE Conf. Publ 148 (1977), pp. 28–31.
Allan, R. N., de Oliveira, M. F., Kozlowski, A., Williams, G. T., ‘Evaluating the reliability of electrical auxiliary systems in multi-unit generating stations’, Proc. IEE, 127, pt C (1980), pp. 65–71.
Green, A. E., Bourne, A. J., Reliability Technology, John Wiley (1972).
Allan, R. N., Rondiris, I. L., Fryer, D. M., Tye, C., Computational Development of Event Trees in Nuclear Reactor Systems, Second National Reliability Conference, Birmingham, UK, March 1979, paper 3D/1.
Allan, R. N., Rondiris, I. L., Fryer, D. M., ‘An efficient computational technique for evaluating the cut/tie sets and common-cause failures of complex systems’, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, R-30 (1981), pp. 101–9.
Singh, C., Patton, A.D., ‘Protection system reliability modelling; unreadiness probability and mean duration of undetected faults’, IEEE Trans. on Reliability, R-29 (1980), pp. 339–40.
Heising, C. R., Ringlee, R. J., ‘Prediction of reliability and availability of HVDC valve and HVDC terminal’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-89 (1970), pp. 619–24.
Billinton, R., Sachdev, M. S., ‘Direct current transmission system reliability evaluation’, CEA Trans., 7, pt 3 (1968), paper 68-SP-170.
Billinton, R., Prasad, V, ‘Quantitative reliability analysis of HVDC transmission systems: I—Spare valve assessment in mercury arc bridge configurations’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-90 (1971), pp. 103–46.
Billinton, R., Prasad, V., ‘Quantitative reliability analysis of HVDC transmission systems: II—Composite system analysis’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-90 (1971), pp. 1047–54.
Billinton, R., Jain, A. V., ‘Unit derating levels in spinning reserve studies’, IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, PAS-90 (1971), pp. 1677–87.
Allan, R. N., Adraktas, A. N., Terminal Effects and Protection System Failures in Composite System Reliability Evaluation, Paper No. 82 SM 428–1, presented at the IEEE Summer Power Meeting, 1982.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billinton, R., Allan, R.N. (1996). Plant and station availability. In: Reliability Evaluation of Power Systems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1860-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1860-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1862-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1860-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive