Skip to main content

Sociospatial Relations of Change

Rural Mexican Women in Urban California

  • Chapter
Women and the Environment

Part of the book series: Human Behavior and Environment ((HUBE,volume 13))

Abstract

When people relocate to a new environment, they invariably must reconceptualize their daily activities; routes from home to schools, shops, work, friends, and family change. Neighbors are more likely to be strangers. The size and layout of rooms in the new home are not identical to those in the old. The greater the conceptual and physical distances between the old and new locales and the more traumatic the move, the greater the need to reconceptualize one’s world becomes, simply to survive. And, perhaps, the harder this transformation is. The distance between a rural Mexican village and an urban Southern California city is immense. Yet, many villagers manage the transition, entwining strands of the familiar with strands of previously unimagined new ways, while letting go of anticipated, but unfulfilled, imaginings of how life would be in the United States.

In our imaginations, we change what we cannot control. —Carlos Fuentes, 1991, p. 17

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aaron, H. J. (1972). Shelter and subsidies: Who benefits from federal housing policies? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allman, W. F. (1989). Apprentices of wonder: Inside the neural network revolution. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Werner, C. (Eds.). (1985). Home environments: Human behavior and environment. Volume 8. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, S. (1986). The representation of women in academic models. In L. Dube, E. Leacock, & S. Ardener (Eds.), Visibility and power: Essays on women in society and development (pp. 3–14). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardener, S. (Ed.). (1981). Women and space: Ground rules and social maps. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benería, L., & Roldán, R. (1987). The crossroads of class and gender. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, I., & Chemers, M. (1980). Culture and environment. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979). Algeria 1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, E. (1978). El uso de las ciudades y de las viviendas. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Siap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certeau de, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. S. Rendell, trans. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1967). Capitalism and material life 1400–1800. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chant, S. (1987). Domestic labour, decision-making, and dwelling construction: The experience of women in Queretaro, Mexico. In C. O. N. Moser & L. Peake (Eds.), Women, human settlements and housing (pp. 33–54). New York: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, L. (1992). Shadowed lives: Undocumented immigrants in American society. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, A., & Sebba, R. (1985). Women’s territoriality in the home. In M. Safir, M. Mednick, D. Israeli, & J. Bernard (Eds.), Women’s worlds: From the new scholarship (pp. 31–37). New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M. (1963). Grieving for a lost home. In L. J. Duhl (Ed.), The urban condition (pp. 151–171). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M., & Gleicher, P. (1961). Some sources of residential satisfaction in an urban slum. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 27, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, C. (1991). Introduction. In A. Lundkvist. Journeys in dream and imagination (pp. 15–20). New York: Four Walls Eight Windows.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1985). Time, space and regionalisation. In D. Gregory & J. Urry (Eds.), Social relations and spatial structures (pp. 265–295). New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilfoyle, E., Grady, A., & Moore, J. (1981). Children adapt. Thorofare, NJ: Charles B. Slack, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold del Castillo, R. (1984). La familia. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, D. (1984). Redesigning the American dream: The future of housing, work and family life. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holston, J. (1989). The modernist city: An anthropological critique of Brasilia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, C. (1974). Inside a Mongolian tent. New Society, 30, 273–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. (Ed.). (1990). Domestic architecture and the use of space: An interdisciplinary cross-cultural study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S. (1982). Analyzing activity areas: An ethnoarchaeological study of the use of space. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. L., & Low, S. M. (1990). The built environment and spatial form. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 453–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, R. (1987). Housing, dwelling and homes: Design theory, research and practice. Chi-chester, U.K.: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1974]). The production of space. Transi. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, S. (1982). A house of my own: Social organization in the squatter settlements of Lima, Peru. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, K. (1984). Haciendo pueblo: The development of a Guadalajaran suburb. Birmingham: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomnitz, L. (1977). Networks and marginality: Life in a Mexican shantytown. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Morales, F. J. (1987). Arquitectura vernácula en México. Benito Juárez, México: Trillas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. M., & Chambers, E. (Eds). (1989). Housing, culture and design: A comparative perspective. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D., Alarcón, R., Durand, J., & González, H. (1987). Return to Aztlan: The social process of international migration from Western Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1990). Motherhood and power: The production of a women’s culture of politics in a Mexican community. American Ethnologist, 17(3), 470–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (1974). Loss and change. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marris, P. (1982). Family and social change in an African city: A study of rehousing in Lagos. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matrix (1984). Making space: Women and the man made environment. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirandé A., & Enriquez, E. (1979). La Chicana: The Mexican-American woman. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. O. N. (1987). Women, human settlements and housing: A conceptual framework for analysis and policy-making. In C. O. N. Moser & L. Peake (Eds.), Women, human settlement and housing (pp. 12–32). New York: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. O. N. & Peake, L. (Eds.). (1987). Women, human settlements and housing. New York: Tavistock Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H. (1986). Space, text and gender: An anthropological study of the Marakwet of Kenya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. (1985 [1970]). In the eyes of the ancestors: Belief and behavior in a Mayan community. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver-Smith, A. (1986). The martyred city: Death and rebirth in the Andes. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pader, E-J. (1988). Inside spatial relations. Architecture and Behaviour, 4(3), 251–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pader, E-J. (1993). Spatiality and social change: Domestic space-use in Mexico and the United States. American Ethnologist, 20(1), 114–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pader, E-J. (1994). Spatial relations and housing policy: Regulations that discriminate against Mexican-origin households. Journal of Planning and Education and Research, 13(2), 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. (1988). What housing does: Changes in an Accra community. Architecture and Behaviour, 4(3), 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A nonverbal communication approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, M. (1991). Living in a man-made world: Gender assumptions in modern housing design. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robben, A. (1989). Habits of the home: Spatial hegemony and the structuration of house and society in Brazil. American Anthropologist, 91, 570–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, M. C. (1985). Contemporary custom: Redefining domestic space in Longana, Vanuatu. Ethnology, 24(4), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosaldo, R. (1985). Assimilation revisited. SCCR Working Paper No. 19, Stanford, CA: Stanford Center for Chicano Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybczynski, W. (1986). Home: A short history of an idea. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, C. M., Altman, I., & Oxley, D. (1985). Temporal aspects of homes: A transactional perspective. In I. Altman & C. M. Werner (Eds.), Home environments: Human behavior and environment, Volume 8 (pp. 1–32). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. (1981). Building the dream: A social history of housing in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavella, P. (1991). Mujeres in factories: Race and class perspectives on women, work, and family. In M. di Leonardo (Ed.), Gender at the crossroads of knowledge: Feminist anthropology in the postmodern era (pp. 312–336). Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pader, EJ. (1994). Sociospatial Relations of Change. In: Altman, I., Churchman, A. (eds) Women and the Environment. Human Behavior and Environment, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1504-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1504-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1506-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1504-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics