Skip to main content

Mortuary Behavior, Labor Organization, and Social Rank

  • Chapter
Regional Approaches to Mortuary Analysis

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology ((IDCA))

Abstract

Mortuary analysis has a long and erratic history in archaeology. Studies of skeletal remains were first motivated by a desire for information on racial affiliation and population movement, while the associated grave goods seemed to offer detailed chronological ordering of artifact types. Much enthusiastic and unsystematic excavation also centered on monuments or site complexes with large quantities of mortuary remains. While archaeological interest has turned away from constructions of sequences and reconstruction of racial types, these complex sites and their archaeological materials, testifying to organized human activity on a large scale, have become key sources of information on broad patterns of social change. Mortuary remains, too, are often highly patterned and are differently so in societies of differing organization, seeming to inform us of social dimensions not readily visible in other archaeological materials. Consequently, we have a current problem (the understanding of social dimensions of nonliterate, prehistoric societies) and a large body of patterned material. The temptation to put two and two together is irresistible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alekshin, V. A., 1983, Burial customs as an archaeological source, Current Anthropology 24:137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammerman, A., 1979, A study of obsidian exchange networks in Calabria, World Archaeology 11:95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, B., 1982, A historical review of ethnological and archaeological analyses of mortuary practice, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 1:32–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binford, L. R., 1971, Mortuary practices: Their study and their potential, in: Approaches to the Social Dimensions oj Mortuary Practices (J. A. Brown, ed.), Memoir of the Society for American Archaeology #25, Washington, D.C., Society for American Archaeology, pp. 6–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., 1988, Status, wealth and the chronological ordering of cemeteries, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 54:327–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, R., 1989, Deaths and entrances: A contextual analysis of megalithic art, Current Anthropology 30:68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, M., 1984, Ritual and prestige in the prehistory of Wessex c. 2200-1400 bc: A new dimension to the archaeological evidence, in: Ideology, Power and Prehistory (D. Miller and C. Tilley, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 93–110.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P, 1979a, Illinois Hopewell burial practices and social organization: A reexamination of the Klunk-Gibson mound group, in: Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference (D. Brose and N. Greber, eds.), Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio, pp. 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P, 1979b, Charnel houses and mortuary crypts: Disposal of the dead in the Middle Woodland period, in: Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference (D. Brose and N. Greber, eds.), Kent State University Press, Kent, Ohio, pp. 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P, 1981a, A critique of some recent North American mortuary studies, American Antiquity 46:398–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P, 1981b, The search for rank in prehistoric burials, in: The Archaeology of Death (R. Chapman, I. Kinnes, and K. Randsborg, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, D. P., and Plog, S., 1982, Evolution of tribal social networks: Theory and prehistoric North American evidence, American Antiquity 47:504–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A., ed., 1971, Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices, Memoir of the Society for American Archaeology #25, Washington, D.C., Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A., 1979, Charnel houses and mortuary crypts: Disposal of the dead in the Middle Woodland Period, in: Hopewell Archaeology: The Chillicothe Conference (D. S. Brose and N. Greber, eds.), Kent State University Press, Kent, pp. 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. A., 1981, The search for rank in prehistoric burials, in: The Archaeology of Death (R. Chapman, I. Kinnes, and K. Randsborg, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnez, C., 1957, La station du terrier de Biard, Commune de Segonzac, Charente, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 54:535–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnez, C., 1976, Le Néolithique et le Chalcolithique dans le centre-ouest de la France, Mémoire de la Société Préhistorique Française, vol. 12, Paris, Société Préhistorique Française.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnez, C. and R. Façon, 1957, Le terrier de Biard, Commune de Segonzac, Charente, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 54:770–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, A., 1989, The historical dimension in mortuary expressions of status and sentiment, Current Anthropology 30:437–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cauvin, M.-C, 1961, Découverte de céramique au Grand Pressigny Indre-et-Loire, L’Anthropologie 65:181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., 1981, Archaeological theory and communal burial in prehistoric Europe, in: Pattern of the Past (I. Hodder, G. Isaac, and N. Hammond, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 387–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., 1982, Autonomy, ranking and resources in Iberian prehistory, in: Ranking, Resource and Exchange (C. Renfrew and S. Shennan, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 46–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, R., I. Kinnes, and K. Randsborg, eds., 1981, The Archaeology of Death, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, L. S., 1984, Southwestern archaeology, Annual Review of Anthropology 13:301–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, L. S., 1985, Status differentiation and social complexity in the prehistoric Southwest: A discussion, in: Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 191-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordier, G., 1957, Le Vrai Visage du Grand Pressigny, Congrès Préhistorique de France Poitiers-Angoulème, 1956, Poitiers, Société Préhistorique Française, pp. 416-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. D., 1985, Hereditary emblems: Material culture in the context of social change, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:149–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T., 1978, Economic and Social Organization of a Complex Chiefdom: The Halelea District, Kauai, Hawaii, University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers #63, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, T, 1989, Evolution of chiefdoms, Current Anthropology 30:84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M., 1967, Evolution of Political Society: An Essay in Political Anthropology, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjellström, R, 1983, Sacrifices, burial gifts and buried treasure: Function and material, ARV, Scandinavian Yearbook of Folklore 39:43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P.-R., 1952, Le travail de la fibrolite en armorique, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 49:395–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P.-R., 1983, The megaliths of France, in: The Megalithic Monuments of Western Europe (C. Renfrew, ed.), Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 18–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P.-R., and J. Cogne, 1955, Étude pétrographique des haches polies de Bretagne: Les haches de combat en metahornblendite, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 52:401–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giot, P.-R., J. LHelgouach, and J.-L. Monnier, 1979, Préhistoire de la Bretagne, Rennes, Ouest-France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, L., 1980, Mississippian Mortuary Practices, A Case Study of Two Cemeteries in the Lower Illinois Valley, Northwestern University Archaeology Program Scientific Paper no. 4, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez de Soto, J., 1980, Les Cultures de l’Age du Bronze dans le Bassin de la Charente, Pierre Fanlac, Périgueux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez de Soto, J., 1983, Le Rempart Chalcolithique du Bronze Ancien du Fort des Anglais à Mouthiers-sur-Böeme, Charente, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 80:38–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, M. W, 1986, Organization and differentiation within Late Prehistoric ranked social units, Mariana Islands, Western Pacific, Journal of Field Archaeology 13:139–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilaine, J., 1980, La France devant la France, Hachette, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, J., 1982, The Evolution of the Prehistoric State, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., 1982a, Sequences of structural change in the Dutch Neolithic, in: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (I. Hodder, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 162–177.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., 1982b, Symbols in Action, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., 1984, Burials, houses, women and men in the European Neolithic, in: Ideology, Power and Prehistory (D. Miller and C. Tilley, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodder, I., 1990, The Domestication of Europe, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, M., 1990, Where’s the why? The new archaeology’s approach to mortuary assemblages, Nexus 8:147–156, 178-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, S. C., and H. King, eds., 1981, Mortality and Immortality: The Anthropology and Archaeology of Death, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joussaume, R., 1985, Des Dolmens pour les Morts: Les Mégalithismes à travers le Monde, Hachette, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K., 1981, Economic models for Bronze Age Scandinavia—Towards an integrated approach, in: Economic Archaeology: Towards an Integration of Ecological and Social Approaches (A. Sheriden and G. Bailey, eds.), Oxford, BAR International Series #96, pp. 239–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristiansen, K., 1982, The formation of tribal systems in later European prehistory: Northern Europe, 4000-500 bc, in: Theory and Explanation in Archaeology (C. Renfrew, M. J. Rowlands, and B. Segraves, eds.), Academic Press, London, pp. 241–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanting, J. N., and J. D. van der Waals, 1976, Beaker culture relations in the lower Rhine Basin, in: Glockenbecher Symposium Oberreid, 1974 (J. N. Lanting and J. D. van der Waals, eds.), Bussum, Haarlem, pp. 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Mort, F., 1983, Méthodes d’étude des sépultures, Archaeologia 179:59–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, C.-T., 1971, A stone axe factory in Brittany, Antiquity 45:283–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, C.-T., 1975, Il y a plusieurs millénaires, fabrication et commerce des haches en pierre polie, Dossiers de l’Archéologie 11:42–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, C.-T., and P.-R. Giot, 1965, Études pétrographiques des haches polies de Bretagne: La découverte des ateliers de la dolérite du Type A, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 162:128–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D., and C. Tilley, 1984, Ideology, power and long-term social change, in: Ideology, Power and Prehistory (D. Miller and A. Tilley, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 147–152.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mohen, J.-P, 1984, Les architectures mégalithiques, La Recherche 161:1528–1538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohen, J.-P, 1989, Le Monde des Mégalithes, Casterman, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohen, J.-P, and D. Bergougnan, 1984, Le camp néolithique de chez Reine à Semussac, Charente-Maritime, L, Étude Archéologique, Gallia Préhistoire 27:7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliviera, D. L., 1986, Monuments and social complexity: A new line of enquiry?, Oxford Journal of Archaeology 5:103–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J., 1981, Social configurations and the archaeological study of mortuary practices: A case study, in: The Archaeology of Death (R. Chapman, I. Kinnes, and K. Randsborg, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J., 1984, Mortuary Variability: An Archaeological Investigation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, J., 1985, Cluster analysis and mortuary patterning: An experimental assessment, PACT Strasbourg 11:91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker-Pearson, M., 1982, Mortuary practices, society, and ideology: An ethnoarchaeological study, in: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (I. Hodder, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 99–113.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Paynter, R., 1989, The archaeology of equality and inequality, Annual Review of Anthropology 18: 369–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R., J.-W. Lee, W. Koh, and A. Underhill, 1989, Social ranking in the kingdom of Old Silla, Korea: Analysis of burials, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 8:1–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plog, E, 1983, Political and economic alliances on the Colorado plateaus, a.d.400-1450, in: Advances in World Archaeology, vol. 2 (E Wendorf and A. E. Close, eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 289–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plog, E, 1985, Status and death at Grasshopper: The homogenization of reality, in: Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 161-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulain, T., 1976, La faune sauvage et domestique en France du néolithique à la fin de l’age de fer, La Préhistoire Française, vol. 3, Paris, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, pp. 104-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J. J., 1985, Measuring social complexity in the American Southwest, in Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 167-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., 1975, Trade an action at a distance: Questions of integration and communication, in: Ancient Civilizations and Trade (J. A. Sabloff and C. C. Lamberg-Karlovsky, eds.), University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, pp. 30–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., 1976, Megaliths, territories and populations, in: Acculturation and Continuity in Atlantic Europe (S. J. de Laet, ed.), Brugge: de Tempel, pp. 198–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., 1981, The megalith builders of Western Europe, in: Antiquity and Man: Essays in Honour of Glyn Daniel (J. D. Evans, B. W. Cunliffe, and C. Renfrew, eds.), Thames and Hudson, London, pp. 72–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renfrew, C., 1984, Socio-economic change in ranked societies, in: Ranking, Resource and Exchange (C. Renfrew and S. J. Shennan, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussot-Larroque, J., 1983, Le “reseau” de néolithique final: Mutations économiques et interrelations ouest-est et est-ouest en France et quelques régions voisines, Godisnjak Akademija Nauha i Umjetnosti Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 21:185–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roussot-Larroque, J., 1984, Artenac aujourd’hui: Pour une nouvelle approche de l’enéolithisation de la France, Revue Archéologique de la France 23:135–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp, D. W, 1985, Prolegomena to a study of stratification and social organization in Iron Age Cyprus, in: Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 119-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. D., 1958, Social Stratification in Polynesia, University of Washington Press, Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Venant, J. de, 1910, Tailleries de silex du sud de la Touraine: Inventaire des produits exportes aux temps préhistoriques et carte de leur aire de diffusion, Congrès Préhistorique de France Tours, Société Préhistorique Française, Tours, pp. 256-299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, A. A., 1970, Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, A. A., 1971, Social dimensions of mortuary practices in a Mesolithic population from Wadi Haifa, Sudan, in: Approaches to the Social Dimensions of Mortuary Practices (J. A. Brown, ed.), Memoir of the Society for American Archaeology #25, Washington, D.C., Society for American Archaeology, pp. 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarre, C., 1985, The Neolithic of west-central France, in: Ancient France (C. Scarre, ed.), Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, pp. 223–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanks, M., and C. Tilley, 1982, Ideology, symbolic power and ritual communication: A reinterpretation of Neolithic mortuary practices, in: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (I. Hodder, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 129–154.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shay, T., 1985, Differentiated treatment of deviancy at death as revealed in anthropological and archeological material, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. E., 1975, The social organisation at Branc, Antiquity 49:279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shennan, S. J., 1982, Ideology, change and the European Early Bronze Age, in: Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (I. Hodder, ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 155–161.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sjogren, K.-G., 1986, Kinship, labor and land in Neolithic Southwest Sweden: Social aspects of megalithic graves, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5:229–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A., 1978, Mortuary practices and the study of prehistoric social systems, in: Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1 (M. B. Schiffer, ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tainter, J. A., 1980, Behavior and status in a Middle Woodland mortuary population from the Illinois Valley, American Antiquity 45:308–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, C., 1984, Ideology and the legitimation of power in the Middle Neolithic of southern Sweden, in: Ideology, Power and Prehistory (D. Miller and C. Tilley, eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 111–146.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torrence, R., 1986, Production and Exchange of Stone Tools, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, K. M., 1984, Mortuary ritual and mortuary remains, Current Anthropology 25:674–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, K. M., 1986, Lindustrie lithique de néolithique final à Semussac, Charente-Maritime, Bulletin de la Société Préhistorique Française 83:233–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, K. M., 1987, Introduction: On boundaries and social complexity, in: Polities and Partitions: Human Boundaries and the Growth oj Complex Societies (K. M. Trinkaus, ed.), Arizona State Anthropological Research Papers #37, Tempe, Arizona State University, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trinkaus, K. M., 1990, Sample comparability and assemblage structure as inferential tools, Unpublished manuscript presented at the 55th annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham, S., 1985, Interpretation of prehistoric political complexity in the central and northern Southwest, in: Status, Structure and Stratification: Current Archaeological Reconstructions, Proceedings of the 16th Annual Chacmool Conference, University of Calgary, pp. 175-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham, S., and F. Plog, 1986, The interpretation of prehistoric political complexity in the central and northern Southwest: Toward a mending of the models, Journal of Field Archaeology 13:223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. A., 1987, Prehistoric tribalization in northwestern Europe, in: Polities and Partitions: Human Boundaries and the Growth of Complex Societies (K. M. Trinkaus ed.), Arizona State Anthropological Research Papers #37, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 29–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., and J. Piontek, 1985, Social context of the unchambered megalithic long barrows in Middle Pomerania, Poland, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 4:116–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A., 1985, Neolithic Europe: A Survey, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, A., 1988, Problems in Neolithic Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Trinkaus, K.M. (1995). Mortuary Behavior, Labor Organization, and Social Rank. In: Beck, L.A. (eds) Regional Approaches to Mortuary Analysis. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1310-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1310-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1312-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1310-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics