Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Applied Clinical Psychology ((NSSB))

  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale provides clinicians with a method for the quick assessment of major dimensions of psychopathology. It was first developed as a 16-item interview-based rating scale by Overall and Gorham (1962) and later expanded to its present 18-item form (Overall, 1983). The scale items were designed to cover a broad range of symptoms and were based on factor analytic studies of earlier scales as well as the clinical expertise of mental health professionals (Hedlund & Vieweg, 1980; Overall, 1983; Overall & Gorham, 1962). The scale is widely used for diagnosis of severe psychopathology and evaluation of treatment related changes in individuals with severe psychopathology. It is most commonly used with schizophrenics; however, it has also been used with depressed, manic, and demented clients. Several researchers (e.g., Bech, Kastrup, & Rafaelsen, 1986) have proposed slight modifications in the scale, but since the Overall (1983) version seems to be most commonly used, we will report on that version.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmed, A., & Lafferty, D. (1982). Scales for measuring mania. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 27, 659–662.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bech, P., Kastrup, ML, & Rafaelsen, O. J. (1986). Mini-compendium of rating scales for states of anxiety, depression, mania, schizophrenia, with corresponding DSM-III syndromes. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol 73 (suppl. no 326), 5-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beller, S. A., & Overall, J. E. (1984). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) in gerop-sychiatric research: II. Representative profile patterns. Journal of Gerontology, 39, 194–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beneke, M., & Rasmus, W. (1992). “Clinical Global Impressions” (ECDEU): Some critical comments. Pharmacopsychiatry, 25, 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carmen, J., Ahdieh, H., Wyatt-Knowles, E., Warga, E., & Panagides, J. (1991). A controlled study of mianserin in moderately to severely depressed outpatients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 27, 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. W., & Lai, B. (1993). Assessing psychopathology in Chinese psychiatric patients in Hong Kong using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 87, 37–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Claghorn, J. (1992). The safety and efficacy of paroxetine compared with placebo in a double-blind trial of depressed outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53, 33–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Claghorn, J., Kiev, A., Rickels, K., Smith, W., & Dunbar, G. (1992). Paroxetine versus placebo: A double-blind comparison in depressed patients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53, 434–438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faustman, W. O., Moses, J. A., Csernansky, J. G., & White, P. A. (1989). Correlations between the MMPI and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale in schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients. Psychiatry Research, 28, 135–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fieve, R., Goodnick, P., Peselow, E., Barouche, F., & Schlegel, A. (1986). Pattern analysis of antidepressant response to fluoxetine. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 47, 560–562.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flemenbaum, A., & Zimmermann, R. L. (1973). Inter-and intra-rater reliability of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 32, 783–792.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hafkensheid, A. (1991). Psychometric evaluation of a standardized and expanded Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 84, 294–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedlund, J. L., & Vieweg, B. W. (1980). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BRS): A comprehensive review. Journal of Operational Psychiatry, 11, 48–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heresco-Levy, U., Greenberg, D., Lerer, B., Dasberg, H., & Brown, W. A. (1993). Trial maintenance neuroleptic dose reduction in schizophrenic outpatients: Two-year outcome. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 54(2), 59–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gotesdam, K. G. (1981). A geriatric rating scale empirically derived from three rating scales for geriatric behavior. Ada Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 64 (Supplementum 294), 54-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, W. (1976). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, J., Bitter, I., Czabor, P., & Volavka, J. (1990). The measurement of subjective experience in schizophrenia: The Subjective Deficit Scale. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 31, 216–226.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J., Honigfeld, G., Singer, J., Meltzer, H., & Clozaril Collaborative Study Group (1989). Clozapine for the treatment-resistant schizophrenic: Results of a US multicenter trial. Psychopharmacology, 99, 60–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, S. R., Opler, L. A., & Lindenmayer, J. (1988). Reliability and validity of the positive and negative syndrome scale for schizophrenics. Psychiatry Research, 23, 99–110.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiev, A. (1992). A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of paroxetine in depressed outpatients. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53, 27–27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laakmann, G., Blaschke, D., Hippius, H., Schewe, S. (1989). Double-blind study of metaclazepam versus diazepam treatment of outpatients with anxiety syndrome. Pharmacopsychiatry, 22, 120–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenox, R. H., Newhouse, P. A., Creelman, W. L., & Whitaker, T. M. (1992). Adjunctive treatment of manic agitation with lorazepam versus haloperidol: A double-blind study. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 53(2), 47–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. E, Singh, H., & Simpson, G. M. (1992). Timing of acute clinical response to fluphenazine. British Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 365–371.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Margo, G. M., Dewan, M. J., Fisher, S., & Greenberg, R. P. (1992). Comparison of three depression rating scales. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 144–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E. (1983). Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale and Brief Psychiatric History Form. In P. A. Keller & L. G. Ritt (Eds.), Innovations in Clinical Practice: A Source Book (pp. 307–316). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962). The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychological Reports, 10, 799–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E., & Hollister, L. E. (1980). Diagnosis and the phenomenology of depressive disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 626–634.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E., & Hollister, L. E. (1982). Decision rules for phenomenological classification of psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 535–545.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Overall, J. E., & Hollister, L. E. (1986). Assessment of depression using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. In N. Satorius & T. A. Ban (Eds.), Assessment of Depression (pp. 159–178). New York: Springer Verlag.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin, J. G., & Klein, D. F. (1987). The clinical measurement of depressive disorders. In A. J. Mareslla, R. M. Hirshfeld, & M. M. Katz (Eds.), The measurement of Depression (pp. 30–83). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, A., Schulterbrandt, J. G., Reatig, N., Crook, T. H., & Odle, D. (1974). Depression subtypes and response to phenelzine, diazepam, and a placebo. Archives of General Psychiatry, 30, 66–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shagass, C, & Roemer, R. A. (1992). Evoked potential topography in major depression: II. Comparisons between subgroups. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 13, 255–261.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Siris, S., Bermanzohn, P., Gonzales, A., Mason, S., White, C, & Shuwall, M. (1991). The use of antidepressants for negative symptoms in a subset of schizophrenic patients. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 27, 331–335.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer, E., Rickels, K., Csanalosi, I., London, J., & Turner, D. (1990). A placebo-controlled study of enciprazine in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A preliminary report. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 26(2), 215–217.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M. (1995). Measures of Global Functioning. In: Sourcebook of Adult Assessment Strategies. Applied Clinical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1277-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1277-0_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1279-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1277-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics