Skip to main content

High-Precision Calculations for the Rydberg States of Helium

  • Chapter
Long-Range Casimir Forces

Part of the book series: Finite Systems and Multiparticle Dynamics ((FSMD))

Abstract

The past ten years have seen profound advances in the accuracy that can be achieved in both theory and experiment for the low-lying and Rydberg states of helium. Helium, with its nucleus and two electrons, is the prototype for many other three-body problems in atomic physics. Unlike hydrogen, it is the simplest system which cannot be solved exactly in the nonrelativistic limit. Yet it displays many of the complexities found in many-electron atoms. It therefore holds a fundamental place in atomic theory, and has been intensively studied since the earliest days of quantum theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 19, 1387 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. W. F. Drake, Can. J. Phys. 66, 586 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. O. Gorceix, P. Indelicato, and J. P. Desclaux, J. Phys. B 20, 639 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Indelicato, O. Gorceix, and J. P. Desclaux, J. Phys. B 20, 651 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Indelicato and J. P. Desclaux, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5139 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. See, for example, S. A. Blundell, W. R. Johnson, and J. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3407 (1991) and earlier references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. F. A. Parpia and I. P. Grant, J. Phys. B 23, 211 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. M. Quiney, I. P. Grant, and S. Wilson, J. Phys. B 23, L271 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One-and Two-Electron Atoms (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. D. R. Hartree, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 26, 89 (1928).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. E. A. Hylleraas, Z. Phys. 48, 469 (1928).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. E. A. Hylleraas, Z. Phys. 54, 347 (1929).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. See Ref. 4, Sect. 32 for a review.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Accad, C. L. Pekeris, and B. Schiff, Phys. Rev. A 4, 516 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Klahn and W. A. Bingel, Theor. Chim. Acta 44, 27 (1977).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Klahn and W. A. Bingel, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 11, 943 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. L. Ince, Ordinary Differential Equations (Dover, New York, 1956).

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. A. Hylleraas and B. Undheim, Z. Phys. 65, 759 (1930).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. C. J. Sansonetti, D. J. Gillaspy, and C. L. Cromer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2539 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. W. Lichten, D. Shiner, and Z.-X. Zhou, Phys. Rev. A 43, 1663 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. P. Zhao, J. R. Lawall, and F. M. Pipkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 592 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. W. Farley, K. B. MacAdam, and W. H. Wing, PHys. Rev. A 20 1754 (5).

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. W. Farley, K. B. MacAdam, and W. H. Wing, PHys. Rev. A 25, 1790(E) (1982).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. E. A. Hessels, F. J. Deck, P. W. Arcuni, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2765 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. E. A. Hessels, F. J. Deck, P. W. Arcuni, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2544(E) (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. E. A. Hessels, F. J. Deck, P. W. Arcuni, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 46, 2622 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 26, 1228 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1253 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1659(E) (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 33, 2780 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 37, 979 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. R. J. Drachman, this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. H. Bartlett, Phys. Rev. 51, 661 (1937).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. V. A. Fock, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Fiz. 18, 161 (1954). See also.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Kato, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 10, 151 (1957).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Macek, Phys. Rev. 160, 170 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. J. D. Morgan III, Theor. Chim. Acta 69, 81 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. K. Frankowski and C. L. Pekeris, Phys. Rev. 146, 46 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. K. Frankowski and C. L. Pekeris, Phys. Rev. 150, 366(E) (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. D. E. Freund, B. D. Huxtable, and J. D. Morgan III, Phys. Rev. A 29, 980 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. J. D. Baker, D. E. Freund, R. N. Hill, and J. D. Morgan III, Phys. Rev. A 41, 1247 (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. J. D. Morgan III and J. Baker, personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  43. C. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. 134, A1181 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1549 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. G. W. F. Drake, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B 31, 7 (1988).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. G. W. F. Drake and A. J. Makowski, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 2207 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. G. W. F. Drake, J. Phys. B 22, L651 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. G. W. F. Drake, J. Phys. B 23, 1943(E) (1990).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2769 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. A. Kono and S. Hattori, Phys. Rev. A 31, 1199 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. A. Kono and S. Hattori, Phys. Rev. A 34, 1727 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. A. Weiss, Phys. Rev. 122, 1826 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. A. R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  54. B. Schiff, H. Lifson, C. L. Pekeris, and R. Rabinowitz, Phys. Rev. 140, A1104 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. M. L. Lewis and P. H. Serafino, Phys. Rev. A 18, 867 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. J. S. Sims and W. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2259 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson, Phys. Rev. A 44, 5448 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. C. Schwartz, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 6, 170 (1959). See also.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. E. Gerjuoy, A. R. P. Rau, and L. Spruch, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 725 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. E. Gerjuoy, L. Rosenberg, and L. Spruch, J. Math. Phys. 16, 455 (1975).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. G. Araki, Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 19, 128 (1937).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  62. R. M. Parish and R. M. Mires, Phys. Rev. A 4, 2145 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  63. D. R. Cok and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 19, 1830 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  64. D. R. Cok and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 24, 3283(E) (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  65. J. D. Morgan III, in AIP Conference Proceedings 189, Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms, edited by W. Johnson, P. Mohr, and J. Sucher (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  66. A. Wheeler, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 48, 219 (1946).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. E. A. Hylleraas, Phys. Rev. 71, 491 (1947).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  68. A. A. Frost, M. Inokuti, and J. P. Lowe, J. Chem. Phys. 41, 482 (1964).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  69. Y. K. Ho, Phys. Rev. A 19, 2347 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Y. K. Ho, J. Phys. B 16, 1503 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Y. K. Ho, Phys. Lett. A 144, 237 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. A. K. Bhatia and A. Temkin, Phys. Rev. 137, A1335 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  73. A. K. Bhatia and R. J. Drachman, Phys. Rev. A 28, 2523 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  74. A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. I (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1968), pp. 365-366.

    Google Scholar 

  75. A. P. Mills, Phys. Rev. A 24, 3242 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  76. A. I. Akhiezer and V. B. Berestetskii, Quantum Electrodynamics (Interscience, New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  77. A. P. Stone, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 77, 786 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  78. A. P. Stone, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 81, 868 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  79. M. Douglas and N. M. Kroll, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 82, 89 (1974). See also.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  80. G. Jansen and B. A. Hess, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6061 (1989) for a recent revision.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. A. M. Sessler and H. M. Foley, Phys. Rev. 92, 1321 (1953).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  82. A. M. Sessler and H. M. Foley, Phys. Rev. 98, 6 (1955).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  83. J. Sucher and H. M. Foley, Phys. Rev. 95, 966 (1954).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  84. G. E. Brown and D. G. Ravenhall, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 208, 552 (1951).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  85. J. Sucher, in AIP Conference Proceedings 136, Atomic Theory Workshop on Relativistic and QED Effects in Heavy Atoms, edited by H. P. Kelly and Y.-K. Kim (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  86. J. Sucher, in Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Relativistic Effects in Atoms, Molecules and Solids, edited by G. Mali (Plenum Press, New York, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  87. J. Sucher, Int. J. Quant. Chem. 25, 3 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. M. H. Mittleman, Phys. Rev. A 4, 897 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  89. M. H. Mittleman, Phys. Rev. A 5, 2395 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  90. I. P. Grant, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 23, 37 (1988) and earlier references therein.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  91. G. W. F. Drake and S. P. Goldman, Phys. Rev. A 23, 2093 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  92. S. P. Goldman and G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 24, 183 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  93. W. R. Johnson and J. Sapirstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1126 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  94. D. Layzer, Monthly Not. R. Astron. Soc. 114, 692 (1954).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  95. D. Layzer, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 271 (1959).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  96. D. Layzer and J. Bachcall, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 17, 177 (1962).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  97. H. T. Doyle, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 5, 337 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  98. G. W. F. Drake, J. Phys. B 9, L169 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  99. G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 3, 908 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  100. G. Feinberg and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 681 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  101. G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 5, 1979 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  102. G. W. Erickson and D. R. Yennie, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 35, 271 and 447 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  103. G. W. F. Drake, Adv. At. Mol. Phys. 18, 399 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  104. J. R. Sapirstein and D. R. Yennie, in Quantum Electrodynamics, edited by T. Kinoshita (World Scientific Singapore, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  105. G. W. F. Drake and R. A. Swainson, Phys. Rev. A 41, 1243 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  106. P. J. Mohr, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 88, 52 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  107. P. J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. A 26, 2338 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  108. P. J. Mohr, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 29, 453 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  109. A. van Wijngaarden, J. Kwela, and G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 43, 3325 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  110. M. A. Doncheski, H. Grotch, and G. W. Erickson, Phys. Rev. A 43, 2152 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  111. M. A. Doncheski, H. Grotch, and D. A. Owen, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2851 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  112. G. W. Erickson and H. Grotch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2611 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  113. W. R. Johnson and G. Soff, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 33, 405 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  114. P. K. Kabir and E. E. Salpeter, Phys. Rev. 108, 1256 (1957).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  115. H. Araki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 17, 619 (1957).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  116. J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. 109, 1010 (1958).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  117. J. Sapirstein, in AIP Conference Proceedings 189, Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms, edited by W. Johnson, P. Mohr, and J. Sucher (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  118. G. W. F. Drake, Can. J. Phys. 66, 586 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  119. K. S. SUH and M. H. Zaidi, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 291, 94 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  120. C. Schwartz, Phys. Rev. 123, 1700 (1961).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  121. K. Aashamar and A. Autsvik, Phys. Norv. 8, 229 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  122. S. P. Goldman and G. W. F. Drake, J. Phys. B 16, L183 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  123. S. P. Goldman and G. W. F. Drake, J. Phys. B 17, L197 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  124. A. Dalgarno and N. Lynn, Proc. Phys. Soc. London Ser. A 70, 802 (1957).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  125. J. P. Vinti, Phys. Rev. 41, 432 (1932).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  126. A. Dalgarno and S. Epstein, J. Chem. Phys. 50, 2837 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  127. A. Dalgarno and J. T. Lewis, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 233, 70 (1956).

    MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  128. A. Dalgarno and A. L. Stewart, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 238, 269 (1956). See also.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  129. R. Sternheimer, Phys. Rev. 84, 244 (1951).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  130. R. Sternheimer, Phys. Rev. 96, 951 (1954).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  131. R. Sternheimer, Phys. Rev. 105, 158 (1957).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  132. C. Schwartz, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 6, 156 (1959).

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  133. G. G. Hall, L. L. Jones, and D. Rees, Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 283, 194 (1965).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  134. A. L. Stewart, Proc. Phys. Soc. London 88, 311 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  135. D. K. McKenzie and G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 44, R6973 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  136. A. Dalgarno and E. M. Parkinson, Phys. Rev. 176, 73 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  137. A. M. Ermolaev and R. A. Swainson, J. Phys. B 16, L35 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  138. S. P. Goldman and G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1683 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  139. E. Borie and G. A. Rinker, Phys. Rev. A 18, 324 (1978). See also Ref. 79, Sect. VI for a recent discussion of nuclera radius measurements.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  140. C. K. Au, G. Feinberg, and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. A 43, 561 (1991).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  141. G. W. F. Drake, Phys. Rev. A 45, 70 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  142. E. A. Hessels, W. G. Sturrus, S. R. Lundeen, and D. R. Cok, Phys. Rev. A 35, 4489 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  143. T. N. Chang, Phys. Rev. A 39, 6129 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  144. M. Idrees and C. F. Fischer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 42, 552 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  145. R. J. Boyd and C. A. Coulson, J. Phys. B 6, 782 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  146. E. R. Cohen and B. N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1121 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  147. F. Biraben, J. C. Garreau, L. Julien, and M. Allegrini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 621 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  148. J. Hiller, J. Sucher, and G. Feinberg, Phys. Rev. A 18, 2399 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  149. H. P. Trevidi, J. Phys. B 13, 839 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  150. R. J. Drachman, J. Phys. B 14, 2733 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  151. R. J. Drachman and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. A 20, 442 (1979).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  152. A. K. Bhatia and J. Sucher, J. Phys. B 13, L409 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  153. J. Hiller, J. Sucher, A. K. Bhatia, and G. Feinberg, Phys. Rev. A 21, 1082 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  154. G. W. F. Drake, in AIP Conference Proceedings 189, Relativistic, Quantum Electrodynamic and Weak Interaction Effects in Atoms, edited by W. Johnson, P. Mohr, and J. Sucher (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1989), p. 158.

    Google Scholar 

  155. J. D. Morgan, III, Phys. Rev. A 40, 6857 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  156. W. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 36, 3575 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  157. L. Hlousek, S. A. Lee, and W. M. Fairbank, Jr., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 328 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  158. E. Giacobino and F. Biraben, J. Phys. B 15, L385 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  159. C. S. Adams, E. Riis, A. I. Ferguson, and W. R. C. Rowley, Phys. Rev. A 45, R2667 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  160. D. H. Yang, P. McNicholl, and H. Metcalf, Phys. Rev. A 33, 1725 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  161. P. Zhao, J. R. Lawall, A. W. Kam, M. D. Lindsay, F. M. Pipkin, and W. Lichten, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1593 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  162. C. W. de Jager, H. de Vries, and C. de Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 14, 479 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  163. H. Collard, R. Hofstadter, E. B. Hughes, A. Johansson, and M. R. Yearian, Phys. Rev. 138, B57 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  164. J. S. McCarthy, I. Sick, R. R. Whitney, and M. R. Yearian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 884 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  165. C. J. Sansonetti and W. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 29, 159 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  166. W. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. A 29, 1883 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  167. J. Baker, R. C. Forrey, R. N. Hill, M. Jerziorska, J. D. Morgan III, and J. Schertzer (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  168. C. J. Sansonetti and J. Gillaspy, Phys. Rev. A 45, R1 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  169. E. J. Kelsey and L. Spruch, Phys. Rev. A 18, 15 and 1055 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  170. C.-K. Au, G. Feinberg, and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1145 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  171. J. F. Babb and L. Spruch, Phys. Rev. A 38, 13 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  172. C.-K. Au, Phys. Rev. A 39, 2789 (1989).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  173. C.-K. Au and M. A. Mesa, Phys. Rev. A 41, 2848 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  174. E. A. Hessels, F. J. Deck, P. W. Arcuni, and S. R. Lundeen, Phys. Rev. A 41, 3663 (1990).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  175. M. Weitz, F. Schmidt-Kaler, and T. W. Hänsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1120 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  176. G. W. F. Drake and Z. C. Yan, Phys. Rev. A 46, 2378 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  177. E. A. Hessels, Phys. Rev. A 46, 5389 (1992).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  178. G. W. F. Drake, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  179. G. W. F. Drake, Adv. At. Mol. Opt. Phys. (in press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1993 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Drake, G.W.F. (1993). High-Precision Calculations for the Rydberg States of Helium. In: Levin, F.S., Micha, D.A. (eds) Long-Range Casimir Forces. Finite Systems and Multiparticle Dynamics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1228-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1228-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1230-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1228-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics