Abstract
Recently, there has been a belief in psycholinguistics that Chomsky’s competence model of language (1965) could be extended to account for linguistic performance. Evidence was obtained from a certain class of speech errors made by normal English speakers, such as “Why do you be an oaf sometimes?” Fay (1978, 1980a, b), in particular, has argued that such errors, termed “transformational errors” (TEs) by him, could be explained as a result of the malfunctioning of the transformational mechanism during speech production. His view will be challenged in this chapter, and an alternative explanation that emphasizes such performance factors as competition, time pressure, and mental work load will be discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baars, B. J. (1980a). The competing plans hypothesis: An heuristic viewpoint on the causes of errors in speech. In Hans W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech. New York: Mouton.
Baars, B. J. (1980b). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press.
Baars, B. J., & Motley, M. T. (1981). A sympathetic critique of naturalistic studies of slips of speech and action. Unpublished manuscript.
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H., & Carlson, T. B. (1981). Context for comprehension. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Dell, G. S. (1984). Representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psycholog: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 222–233.
Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1980). Toward a unified model of slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press.
Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(6), 611–629.
Dijk, T. A. van (1977). Text and context: Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. New York: Longman.
Fay, D. (1978). Transformations as mental operations: A reply to Kuczaj. Journal of Child Language, 5(1), 143–149.
Fay, D. (1980a). Transformational errors. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press.
Fay, D. (1980b). Performing transformations. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Foss, D. J., & Fay, D. (1975). Linguistic theory and performance models. In D. Cohen & J. R. Wirth (Eds.), Testing linguistic hypotheses. New York: Wiley.
Garrett, M. F. (1980a). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production, Vol. 1: Speech and Talk. New York: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1980b). The limits of accommodation: Arguments for independent processing levels in sentence production. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance. New York: Academic Press.
Green, D. W. (1986). Control, activation, and resource: A framework and a model for the control of speech in bilinguals. Brain and Language, 27, 210–223.
Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
MacKay, D. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy: Trade-offs in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89, 483–506.
Maratsos, M., & Kuczaj, S. (1978). Against the transformationalist account: A simpler analysis of auxiliary overmarkings. Journal of Child Language, 5, 337–345.
Moray, R. E. (1979). Mental workload: Its theory and measurement. New York: Plenum Press.
Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 86, 214–255.
Norman, D. A. (1981). Categorization of action slips. Psychological Review, 88, 1–15.
Shiffrin, R. M., Dumais, S. T., & Schneider, W. (1981). Characteristics of automatism. In J. Long and A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Sridhar, S. N., & Sridhar, K. K. (1980). The syntax and psycholinguistics of bilingual code mixing. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 34, 407–416.
Stemberger, J. P. (1982). Syntactic errors in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 313–345.
Voegelin, C. F. (Ed.). (1967). Constituent structures (2nd ed.). The Hague: Mouton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chen, JY., Baars, B.J. (1992). General and Specific Factors in “Transformational Errors”. In: Baars, B.J. (eds) Experimental Slips and Human Error. Cognition and Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1166-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1164-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive