Abstract
Empirical disciplines have long distinguished between two types of evidence bearing on behavior: experimental evidence and naturalistic evidence. In behavioral biology, both types of evidence are routinely used. It is generally recognized that naturalistic evidence cannot be dispensed with, because there is no way to guarantee natural behavior in an experimental setting. An effort is always made, however, to control observation as carefully as is possible. Within cognitive psychology, naturalistic data are not well respected. They are used most extensively in social psychology and in studies of child language acquisition, where the spontaneous speech of a child may be recorded for later analysis. They are also used in at least one aspect of adult cognitive behavior: the study of errors of performance, with the greatest emphasis on language errors. These studies are generally not very well controlled. Because errors occur at such a low frequency, it is not feasible to record large chunks of naturally occurring speech and analyze them for errors. Researchers have used the less controlled method of listening for errors and then recording them (generally using pen and paper, but with tape recording in at least two cases). There are enough problems with this methodology so that many cognitive psychologists are skeptical of the results of any studies based on naturally occurring errors. It is my purpose here to review evidence showing that naturalistic speech-error data are reliable and replicable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baars, B. J. (1980). On eliciting predictable speech errors in the laboratory. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Baars, B. J. Motley, M. T., & MacKay, D. G. (1975). Output editing for lexical status from artificially elicited slips of the tongue. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 382–391.
Bybee, J. L., & Slobin, D. I. (1982). Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language, 58, 265–289.
Chen, J.-Y., & Baars, B. J. (1985). The competing plans hypothesis as an alternative explanation of some “transformational errors.” Presented at the meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Boston.
Cole, R. A., Jakimik, J., & Cooper, W. E. (1978). Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 44–56.
Cutler, A. (1980). Productivity in word formation. Papers from the 16th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 45–51). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, University of Chicago.
Cutler, A. (1981). The reliability of speech error data. Linguistics, 19, 561–592.
Davidsen-Nielsen, N. (1975). A phonological analysis of English sp, st, sk with special reference to speech error evidence. Journal of the International Phonetics Association, 5, 3–25.
Dell, G. S. (1984). The representation of serial order in speech: Evidence from the repeated phoneme effect in speech errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 222–233.
Dell, G. S. (1985). Positive feedback in hierarchical connectionist models: Applications to language production. Cognitive Science, 9, 3–23.
Dell, G. S. (1991). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 313–349.
Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1980). Toward a unified theory of slips of the tongue. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611–629.
Fay, D. (1980). Transformational errors. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Fay, D. (1981). Substitutions and splices: A study of sentence blends. Linguistics, 19, 717–749.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 27–52.
Fromkin, V. A. (1980). Introduction. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Garrett, M. F. (1976). Syntactic processes in language production. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 231–256). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Garrett, M. F. (1980). The limits of accommodation. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Kupin, J. J. (1982). Tongue twisters as a source of information about speech production. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Laver, J. (1980). Slips of the tongue as neuromuscular evidence for a model of speech production. In H. W. Dechert & M. Raupach (Eds.), Temporal variables in speech (pp. 21–26). The Hague: Mouton.
Levitt, A. G., & Healy, A. F. (1985). The roles of phoneme frequency, similarity, and availability in the experimental elicitation of speech errors. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 717–733.
MacKay, D. G. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 323–350.
MacKay, D. G. (1971). Stress pre-entry in motor systems. American Journal of Psychology, 1, 35–51.
MacKay, D. G. (1976). On the retrieval and lexical structure of verbs. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 169–182.
MacKay, D. G. (1978). Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 61–71.
MacKay, D. G. (1980). Speech errors: Retrospect and prospect. In V. A. Fromkin (Ed.), Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue, ear, pen, and hand. New York: Academic Press.
Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1975). Encoding sensitivities to phonological markedness and transition probability: Evidence from spoonerisms. Human Communication Research, 2, 351–361.
Motley, M. T., & Baars, B. J. (1979). Effects of cognitive set upon laboratory induced verbal (Freudian) slips. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 22, 421–432.
Nooteboom, S. (1969). The tongue slips into patterns. Leyden studies in linguistics and phonetics. The Hague: Mouton.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1979). Speech errors as evidence for a serial ordering mechanism in sentence production. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing (pp. 295–342). New York: Halsted Press.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1980). The single phonemic error predominates as error unit. Presented at the 100th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Los Angeles.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1981). Position of errors in tongue twisters and spontaneous speech: Evidence for two processing mechanisms? Presented at the 102nd meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Miami.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1985). Segmental speech errors occur earlier in utterance planning than certain phonetic processes. Presented at the 109th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Austin.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Klatt, D. (1979). The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech errors. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 41–55.
Stemberger, J. P. (1982a). The lexicon in a model of language production. Doctoral dissertation, University of California—San Diego. New York: Garland Publishing, 1985.
Stemberger, J. P. (1982b). The nature of segments in the lexicon: Evidence from speech errors. Lingua, 56, 235–259.
Stemberger, J. P. (1982c). Syntactic errors in speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 313–345.
Stemberger, J. P. (1983a). Inflectional malapropisms: Form-based errors in English morphology. Linguistics, 21, 573–602.
Stemberger, J. P. (1983b). Speech errors and theoretical phonology: A review. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
Stemberger, J. P. (1984). Lexical bias in errors in language production: Interactive components, editors, and perceptual biases. Unpublished manuscript: Carnegie-Mellon University.
Stemberger, J. P. (1986). Lexical phonology and slips of the tongue. Unpublished manuscript, University of Minnesota.
Stemberger, J. P. (1990). Wordshape errors in language production. Cognition, 35, 123–157.
Stemberger, J. P. (1991). Apparent anti-frequency effects in language production: The addition bias and phonological underspecification. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 161–185.
Stemberger, J. P., & Lewis, M. (1986). Reduplication in Ewe: Morphological accommodation to phonological errors. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 151–160.
Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986a). Form-oriented errors in inflectional processing. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 329–354.
Stemberger, J. P., & MacWhinney, B. (1986b). Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms. Memory and Cognition, 14, 17–26.
Stemberger, J. P., & Treiman, R. (1986). The internal structure of word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 163–180.
Stemberger, J. P., Pisoni, D. B., & Hathaway, S. N. (1985). Effects of alcohol intoxication on phonological errors in normal speech. Research on Speech Perception Progress Reports No. 11. Bloomington: Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stemberger, J.P. (1992). The Reliability and Replicability of Naturalistic Speech Error Data. In: Baars, B.J. (eds) Experimental Slips and Human Error. Cognition and Language. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1164-3_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1166-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1164-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive