Abstract
This is a time of extraordinary transitions for the nation’s federal laboratories. The defense laboratories, of course, have been most profoundly affected by the end of the Cold War, which development alters their missions radically. But nondefense laboratories and the agencies that fund them also must adapt to a changing environment. Widespread concern about American competitiveness in a global economy places a premium on efficient utilization of federally funded technological resources. A large and growing federal deficit squeezes laboratory budgets and forces laboratories to look for customers and partners outside the federal government. An energetic new Administration seeks ways to “reinvent” government at all levels and is open to creative proposals to reduce costs and increase productivity, while also advancing American technology. Congress always plays an important role in reshaping federal programs and facilities, and many members of Congress have a strong interest in issues related to technology and industry; the largest Congressional caucus is the Caucus on Competitiveness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1991 May). Federally funded research: Decisions for a decade OTA-SET-490. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Cong. Senate Committee on Government Affairs (1992 July 21). The government role in civilian technology. Statement of John Sullivan Wilson. 102d Cong., 2d sess.
National Science Board (U.S.) Committee on Industrial Support for R&D (1992). The competitive strength of U.S. industrial science and technology: Strategic issues. Report of the National Science Board, Committee on Industrial Support for R&D (NSB-92–138). Washington: National Science Foundation, p. v.
Council on Competitiveness (1992, September). Industry as a customer of the federal laboratories. Washington: Council on Competitiveness, 1,4.
White, R. M. (1992, Winter). In search of a technology strategy. The Bridge22 (4), 10.
U.S. Congress House of Representatives Committee on Science, Space, and Technology (1992, July). Report of the Task Force on the Health of Research. (Chairman George E. Brown, Jr.), 102d Cong., 2d sess., Report 102.966 Washington: GPO.
Defense Conversion Commission (U.S.) (1992, December 31). Adjusting to the drawdown. Report of the Defense Conversion Commission, Washington, 1.
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (U.S.), Panel on the Government Role in Civilian Technology (1992). The government role in civilian technology: Building a new alliance. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering Institute of Medicine. Washington: National Academy Press, 3.
Council on Competitiveness (1991). Gaining new ground: Technology priorities for America’s future. Washington: Council on Competitiveness.
Committee on Technology Policy Options in a Global Economy, National Academy of Engineering (1993). Mastering a new role: Shaping technology policy for economic performance. Washington: National Academy Press, v.
Schmid, Loren C, Chairman, Federal Laboratory Consortium (1993, April 21). Public testimony before the Committee on Armed Services, Subcommittee on Research and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, 12.
Clinton, W. J. & Gore, A. Jr. (1993, February 22). Technology for America’s economic growth: A new direction to build economic strength. The White House: Office of the Press Secretary, 8.
Clinton, W. J. (1993, February 17). A vision of change for America. Report accompanying address to the Joint Session of Congress. Washington: U.S. Executive Office of the President, 54.
White House (1993, October 22). Office of the Press Secretary.
Aspin, L. (1993, April 21). Letters of congratulation to defense laboratory scientists, and engineers who won FLC awards for excellence in technology transfer.
Creedon, J., Abbott, K., Ault, L. et al. (1992, December 21). NASA technology transfer. Washington: NASA Institutional Team on Technology Transfer, 12.
Defense Conversion Commission (U.S.) (1992, December 31). Adjusting to the drawdown Report of the Defense Conversion Commission, Washington, 28.
United States Department of Commerce (1989, July). Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986: The first 2 years. Report to the President and the Congress from the Secretary of Commerce. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, 7.
United States Department of Commerce (1993, January). Technology transfer under the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act: The second biennial report. Report to the President and the Congress from the Secretary of Commerce. Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, 1 Appendix B.
Mullins, R., Acting Deputy Director, Office of Technology Commercialization, U.S. Department of Commerce (1993, March). Personal communication.
Stern, R., Technology Transfer/Small Business Manager Electronics and Power Sources Directorate, Army Research Laboratory Ft. Monmouth NJ (1993, March 17). Personal communication.
Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer (1992, November). ORTA Handbook, No. 2 of Federal Laboratory Consortium Handbook Series Sequim WA: FLC Publications, 3–1.
Schmid, L. C. (1992, March 12). Federal laboratory and industry relationships. Statement to U.S. Senate, Committee on Governmental Affairs, Subcommittee on Government Information and Regulation, 102d Cong., 2d sess. Washington: GPO, 50–58.
Linsteadt, G., FLC Administrator (1993, March 15). Personal communication.
U.S. General Accounting Office (1992, December). Technology transfer: Barriers limit royalty sharing effectiveness. Report to Congressional Committees (GAO/RCED-93–6). Washington: n. p. 3.
Schräge, M. (1993, February 19). Slashing national labs’ budgets might really get them thinking. The Washington Post (Final ed.), See. Financial, 3.
Erlich, J. H., Chief, Hanscom Patent Prosecution Office Air Force Legal Service Agency, Waltham MA (1993, March 5). Personal communication.
Elbaum, S., Chief, Intellectual Property Law Division Army Research Laboratory and Chairman, FLC Legal Networking Subcommittee (1992, November 3). Enhancing our intellectual property resources: The roles of ORTAs lawyers, and laboratory directors. Paper presented at the FLC Fall 1992 Meeting, Scottsdale AZ, 2.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office (1992, October). Highlights in patent activity. n. p., 18.
Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1988, October). Putting science and technology to work: A casebook of transferred technologies. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC06–76RLO 1830, PNL-SA-16279. Richland WA: Pacific Northwest Laboratory.
Technology Innovation: Chapter 63, United States Code Annotated Title 15, Commerce and Trade: Sections 3701 to 3715 (As Amended Through 1990 Public Law and with Annotations) (1991). Prepared for The Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer. St. Paul MN: West Publishing Company, 24.
Duston, D., Director, Innovative Science and Technology Office, SDIO, The Pentagon (1993, June 30). Personal communication.
Akbay, I., Director, Technology Utilization Office George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, AL (1993, September 30). Personal communication.
Erlich, J. N., Chief, Hanscom Patent Prosecution Office Air Force Legal Service Agency, Waltham MA (1993, September 27). Personal communication.
McKinley, T., Associate Division Director, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (1993, October 5). Personal communication.
Houston, S. R., Associate Director/Program Manager Western Management Development Center, Office of Personnel Management Denver (1993, April 20). Personal communication.
Wright, H. B., Manager, Technology Transfer & Commercialization, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, and FLC Southeast Regional Coordinator (1993, October 12). Personal communication.
Dudick, C, Manager, Technology Commercialization Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland WA (1992, May). Personal communication.
Hayes, K., Coordinator, Technology Transfer Information Center, National Agricultural Library USD A, Beltsville MD (1993 October 4). Personal communication.
Brantley, C. J., Manager, Government Activities, IEEE-USA (1993, October 5). Personal communication.
Stern, R., Technology Transfer/Small Business Manager Army Research Laboratory, Electronic & Power Sources Directorate, Ft. Monmouth NJ (1992, July). Personal communication.
Blair, D., Chief, Office of Research & Technology Applications, Armstrong Laboratory, Brooks AFB TX and FLC Mid Continent Regional Coordinator (1993, October 5). Personal communication.
Stark, E., Program Manager for Economic Development and Technical Assistance, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos NM (1993, April 20). Personal communication.
Jacobs, M. C, Small Business Innovation Research Program/Industrial Liaison, ARPA (1993, April 6). Personal communication.
MacLellan, D. C, Assistant Director, MIT Lincoln Laboratory, Lexington MA (1993 February 17). Personal communication.
Erlich, J. N. (1993, June). Mechanisms for transferring federally owned technology. Presented at the Licensing Executives Society, Washington, 2.
Richards, G., Assistant Laboratory Counsel, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Chairman of the FLC Legal Networking Working Group on Liability and Indemnification (1993, March 15). Personal communication.
Bagley, J. F., Vice President, External Affairs, Battelle Memorial Institute, Washington (1993, March 5). Personal communication.
Wright, H. B., Manager, Technology Transfer and Commercialization, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville TN, and FLC Southeast Regional Coordinator (1993, October 12). Personal communication.
Wunderlich, E., Head, Commercial Applications & Transfer Office, Naval Air Warfare Center, China Lake CA (1993, March 18). Personal communication.
American Technology Preeminence Act, PL 102–245, Title III, Sec. 303. amending 15 U.S.C. 3710.
Hot products: How good design pays off, (1993, June 7) Business Week 54.
Berube, K., Program Manager, Industrial Designers Society of America, Great Falls VA (1993, October 5). Personal communication.
Stark, E., Program Manager for Economic Development and Technical Assistance, Los Alamos National Laboratory (1993, October 5). Personal communication.
Lanham, C. E., Manager, Army Domestic Technology Transfer Program, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi MD (1993, March 9). Personal communication.
Roessner, D. J. (1993, March). Patterns of industry interaction with federal laboratories. Report of the School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, 7.
Rodriquez, P., Air Force Contract Manager, Phillips Laboratory/State of New Mexico (1993, March 30). Personal communication.
USAF Phillips Laboratory (1993). Licensing of Phillips Laboratory patented technologies. (Prepared by the Patent Prosecution Office, Air Force Legal Services Agency, Office of the Judge Advocate General). University of New Mexico.
H. R. 3773, 99th Congress, 2nd Session, 4 (1986). Committee report accompanying P.L. 99–502.
Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer (1992). Issues related to copyrighting federal software. Prepared for the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, United States House of Representatives. Washington: The Consortium.
Erickson, R., Staff Patent Attorney, Office of Naval Research, Arlington VA (1993, January 25). Personal communication.
Chem Service, Inc., v. Environmental Monitoring Systems Lab-Cincinnati of the U.S. EPA et al., Civ. Action No. 92–0989 (E. D. Pa 11 January 1993).
Lanham, C. E., Manager, Army Domestic Technology Transfer Program, Army Research Laboratory, Adelphi MD (1993, March 17). Personal communication.
Naval Air Warfare Center, Weapons Division (1993 February). ECI advances technology sharing. Press release, China Lake CA.
U.S. Congress House of Representatives (1992, October 1). National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993. Conference report to accompany H.R. 5006.102d Cong., 2d sess., Report 102–966. Washington: GPO, 40–41.
U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, Office of Public and Agency Information (1993, February 23). Cooperative research and development agreement between Analysas Corporation and CIA. Press release.
Council on Competitiveness (1992, September 24). Industry as a customer of the federal laboratories. Washington: Council on Competitiveness.
Phillips, G., FLC Far West Regional Coordinator, on behalf of Brigadier General Paul, Deputy Chief of Staff for Science and Technology, Wright Patterson AFB (1993, October 5). Personal communication.
H. R. 3773, 99th Congress, 2nd Session, 4 (1986). Committee report accompanying P.L. 99–502.
Thompson, O., Program Manager, Technology Transfer Sandia National Laboratories (1991, March). Personal communication.
Schmid, L. C, Manager, Office of Technology Deployment Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland WA (1990, March). Personal communication.
Simon, J., Manager, Technology Leveraging, General Motors (1993 January). Personal communication.
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Office of Media Relations Department (1993, February 8). U.S. Chamber announces Chamber tech initiative. Washington: Press release.
Grissom, F. E. & Chapman, R. L. (1992). Mining the nation’s brain trust: How to put federally-funded research to work for you. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer (1992, June). Mechanisms accessing federal resources. Sequim, WA: Federal Laboratory Consortium Publications. This document was approved by the relevant federal departments and agencies, including DOD and NASA.
Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology Transfer (1993). Tapping federal technology: Inventions, expertise, and facilities. No. 3 of Federal Laboratory Consortium Handbook Series. Sequim, WA: Federal Laboratory Consortium Publications.
Center for the Utilization of Federal Technology National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce (1990). Federal laboratory & technology resources: A guide to services, facilities, and expertise. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Nottke, J. E., Director Technology Acquisition, DuPont Central Research & Development (1993, March 16). Personal communication.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1993 May). Defense conversion: Redirecting R&D OTA-ITE-552. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 103.
Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy (1993). Science, Technology and the Federal Government: National Goals for a New Era (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine.) Washington: National Academy Press, 48–49.
Roessner, D. J. (1993). Patterns of industry interaction with federal laboratories. Report of the School of Public Policy Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, G A, 7.
Center for Strategic and International Studies (1993). National Benefits From National Labs. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 48.
McNamara, M., Technology Transfer Manager, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport CT (1993, April 20). Personal communication.
Belenko, V. (1980). MiG pilot: The final escape of Lt. Belenko. New York: McGraw-Hill, 105.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Berger, B.J. (1994). Technology Transfer in a Time of Transition. In: Kassicieh, S.K., Radosevich, H.R. (eds) From Lab to Market. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1143-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1143-8_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1145-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1143-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive