Skip to main content

The Role of the Firm’s Internal Technical Entrepreneurs in Commercializing Technology from Federal Laboratories

  • Chapter
From Lab to Market

Abstract

This paper describes the role of the corporate internal technical entrepreneur in commercializing technology from federal laboratories. The study of the process of technology transfer from federal labs has been well documented in the literature. Chakrabarti and Rubenstein [4], for example, studied factors which significantly affected the adoption of 45 NASA-disseminated technologies in 68 organizations. Whiteley and Postma [21] studied several federal laboratories and their past and current users and collaborators. They suggested that the main mechanism for interaction between the federal laboratory and industry is at the individual level, between researchers in the interacting organizations. Wolek [22] studied the technology transfer process at the USDA’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS). He surveyed 54 cases of transfer in over 50 ARS laboratories, and concluded that “the polices, procedures and resources of ARS are not designed to support effective transfer to industry” (p. ii). Allen et al. [1] studied three large national DOE (Department of Energy) laboratories. They concluded that “those inventors who become entrepreneurs in order to commercialize their inventions have different attitudes ex post from those inventors who do not participate in the commercialization of their inventions through the act of entrepreneurship” (p. 12).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, N., Kassicieh, S., Radosevich, R., & Soderstrom, J. (1991). Attitudinal and situational differences between national laboratory inventors and inventor-entrepreneurs. Working paper, University of New Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berkowitz, B. D. (1993). Can defense research revive U.S. industry? Issues in Science and Technology, 9 (2), Winter, 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Booth, W. (1982, January 6). NIH scientists agonize over technology transfer. Science, 243 pp. 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chakrabarti, A., & Rubenstein, A. H. (1976, February). Interorganizational transfer of technology: A study of adoption of NASA innovations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 23,(1) 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hetzner, W. A., (1973). An analysis of factors influencing the transfer of technology from DoD laboratories to state and local agencies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University Evanston, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Louis, K., Blumenthal, D., Gluck, M., & Starto, M. (1989). Entrepreneurs in academe: An exploration of behaviors among life scientists. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 110–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Radosevich, R. (1993, Summer). A mixed strategy model and case example of federal technology transfer. International Journal of Technology Management, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rubenstein, A. H. (1992). Research opportunities in the study of technical entrepreneurship in the large firm: A propositional inventory. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 3 83–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rubenstein, A. H. (1990) Barriers to successful technical entrepreneurship in the large firm: Some case studies. Paper presented at the meeting of the Institute of Management Sciences, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rubenstein, A. H. (1989) Managing technology in the decentralized firm. Wiley Series on Management of Science and Technology. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rubenstein, A. H., & Geisler, E. (1988). The use of indicators and measures of the R&D process in evaluating science and technology programs. In D. Roessner (Ed.), Government innovation policy. St. Martin’s Press, pp. 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rubenstein, A. H., & Geisler, E. (1985) First technical report on a study of indicators of the productivity/effectiveness of Army R&D laboratories. Report submitted to the U.S. Department of the Army. IASTA, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubenstein, A. H., & Geisler, E. (1984) Multidisciplinary research in a large federal agency. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Interdisciplinary Research Seattle.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rubenstein, A. H., & Geisler, E. (1983) Development of output and impact indicators flow diagrams for the objectives of ARS program plan. Technical Memo, No. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rubenstein, A. H., & Geisler, E. (1980) A methodology for monitoring and evaluating the outputs of a federal research laboratory. Proceedings of the 9th DoD/Federal Acquisition Institute Acquisition Research Symposium Annapolis MD.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rubenstein, A. H., Geisler, E., & Lai, P. (1989). Barriers and facilitators to technical entrepreneurship in the large firm. Second International Conference on Engineering Management Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubenstein, A. H., Geisler, E., & Souder, W. (1979). An organizational design approach to project management in government R&D organization. Proceedings of the IEEE Engineering Management Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rubenstein, A. H., Geisler, E., Rawlins, & Elliott, L. (1985). Issues in transition from single disciplines to multi-disciplinary research in a large federal agency. In: G. Marr, W. Newell & B. Saxberg (Eds.), Managing High Technology Elsevier Publishers, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  19. U.S. Department of Commerce (1989). The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986: The first two years. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  20. U.S. General Accounting Office (1991). Diffusing innovations: Implementing the Technology Transfer Act of 1986. Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Whiteley, R., & Postma, H. (1982, November). How national laboratories can supplement industry’s in-house R&D facilities. Research Management 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wolek, F. (1984). Technology Transfer & ARS. Wharton ARC.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yates, R. (1992, October 26). Refitting Cold War science; New role for national labs: Make U.S. competitive. Chicago Tribune.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimke, M. D., & Lasse, J. (1988). “Affirmative technology,” spinoff 1988: Bringing federal and university research to market. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting Technology Transfer Society, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geisler, E., Rubenstein, A.H. (1994). The Role of the Firm’s Internal Technical Entrepreneurs in Commercializing Technology from Federal Laboratories. In: Kassicieh, S.K., Radosevich, H.R. (eds) From Lab to Market. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1143-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1143-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1145-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1143-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics