Abstract
Under the terms of disarmament treaties agreed between the United States and the Soviet Union/Commonwealth of Independent States since 1987, there is to be a reduction in the nuclear arsenals of the signatory countries of some 90% by 2003 (Figure 1). This reduction implies the redundancy of a large amount of high enriched uranium (HEU) and weapons-grade plutonium for which no provision was made in the disarmament treaties. This led to the suggestion that ex-warhead HEU could be used in civilian power reactors and that the US should acquire the material with the intention of feeding it into the civilian fuel cycle. Military HEU is normally enriched to over 90% while civilian reactor fuel is usually enriched to between 3% and 4%. For use in civilian reactors military HEU must therefore be blended down to civilian levels of enrichment. The blending down of the ex-weapons material would thus prevent it from falling into the wrong hands while its purchase by the US Government would allow the US to control how and when it might enter the marketplace, thereby reducing the risk of disruption of the commercial fuel markets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
The Uranium Institute, London, The Future of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, statement by the Uranium Institute to the 1995 Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, (1994).
The Uranium Institute, London, The Global Uranium Market: Supply and Demand 1992–2010, (1994).
Albright, Berkhout, and Walker, World Inventory of Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium, 1992, SIPRI, (1993).
US Department of Energy, US Department of Energy Interim Uranium Inventory Report, (1994).
J J Steyn, Potential Impact of Arms Reduction on LWR Fuel Cycle: An Update, Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium, the Uranium Institute, September, (1992).
P Goldschmidt, Plutonium and Peace, The Point of View of a European, Nuclear Energy Institute International Uranium Fuel Seminar 1994, Beaver Creek, Colorado, September (1994).
US National Academy of Sciences, Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium, Prepublication Copy, (1994.)
P Goldschmidt, P Verbeek: The Disposition of Plutonium from Dismantled Warheads: a West European Electric Utility View, Nuclear Europe Worldscan, 5/6, 49, (1994).
D Marr, R Howsley & B Burrows, The Military Plutonium Surplus — An Asset or a Liability?, Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium, die Uranium Institute, September, (1994).
J P Holdren, Dangerous Surplus, The Bulletin Of The Atomic Scientists, May/June, (1994).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, G.E., Bhar, R. (1995). The Importance to the Civil Nuclear Industry of Absorbing Dismantled Military Material. In: Kursunoglu, B.N., Mintz, S.L., Perlmutter, A. (eds) Global Energy Demand in Transition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1048-6_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1048-6_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1050-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1048-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive