Skip to main content

Revising the 1/N Expansion for the Slave-Boson Approach within the Functional Integral

  • Chapter
Book cover The Hubbard Model

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NSSB,volume 343))

  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years the slave-boson method1 has been applied to a large variety of strongly correlated problems including the Kondo impurity and lattice2, the Anderson Hamiltonian3, and the Hubbard model(s)4. The method, which maps the physical electron destruction operator c σ with spin σ into products of new fermions d σ and bosons b, has been usually treated within a functional integral representation of the partition function since this representation suitably enforces the constraints of the theory and allows for a large-N expansion, which is free from infrared divergences in the so-called radial gauge5,6. Despite the large literature in the field, it appears that few analises have been carried out on the quantitative reliability of the method. This point was addressed by Zhang, Jain, and Emery7 for a two-level single-site problem. They concluded that the slave boson approach and the large N expansion were inadequate to reproduce the known exact results for this simple model. In Ref.[7], as in all previous literature, it was assumed that the continuum imaginary time limit (which is implicit in any path integral definition) can be safely taken at the outset in the effective action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The slave-boson method has been introduced by S.E. Barnes [J. Phys. F 6, 1375 (1976)] and

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Coleman [Phys. Rev. B 29, 3035 (1984)].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Coleman, Ref.1

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Read and D.M. Newns, J. Phys. C 16, 3273 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Auerbach and K. Levin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 877 (1986).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. S.E. Barnes, Ref.1 and J. Phys. F 7, 2637 (1977)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.J. Millis and P.A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 35, 3394 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Kotliar and A.E. Ruckenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1362 (1986).

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Read, J. Phys. C 18, 2651 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. For an exhaustive list of references, see N.E. Bickers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 845 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Zhang, J.K. Jain, and V.J. Emery, Phys. Rev. B46, 5599 (1992).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. E. Arrigoni, C. Castellani, R. Raimondi, and G.C. Strinati submitted for publication (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cf., e. g., L.S. Schulman, Techniques and applications of path integration (J. Wiley, New York, 1981).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. The contribution originating from the measure in the radial gauge is implicit in (5).

    Google Scholar 

  15. We have found it troublesome to compare our results for the Gaussian fluctuations in the continuum limit with the results given in Ref.[7], because of several apparent inconsistencies found in the expressions of Ref.[7] (corrected yet of evident misprints). Nonetheless, we were able to compare numerically our results with Fig.2 of Ref.[7] for the case Δ/t = 4.0 (where \( r_0^2 \to 0 \)), provided we assign a missing factor 1/2 to the fluctuation contribution in Eq.(38) of Ref.[7].

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arrigoni, E., Castellani, C., Raimondi, R., Strinati, G.C. (1995). Revising the 1/N Expansion for the Slave-Boson Approach within the Functional Integral. In: Baeriswyl, D., Campbell, D.K., Carmelo, J.M.P., Guinea, F., Louis, E. (eds) The Hubbard Model. NATO ASI Series, vol 343. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1042-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1042-4_22

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-1044-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-1042-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics