Advertisement

Superfamily and Domain

Organization of Data for Molecular Evolution Studies
  • Winona C. Barker
  • Friedhelm Pfeiffer
  • David G. George

Abstract

In the mid 1970’s, Dayhoff proposed that all naturally occurring proteins would cluster into families and superfamilies whose members have diverged from common ancestral forms (Dayhoff et al., 1975; Dayhoff, 1976). A similar proposal was made by Emil Zuckerkandl (1975). Estimates of the number of protein superfamilies were in the low thousands. Recently this estimate has been reassessed. Using a variety of criteria for superfamily membership, estimates of the same order of magnitude as the original Dayhoff estimate have been reported (Green et al., 1993; Gonnet et al., 1992; Chothia, 1992).

Keywords

Homology Class Homology Domain Protein Sequence Database Sulfite Oxidase Orotate Phosphoribosyltransferase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barker, W.C., and Dayhoff, M.O. (1977) Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 57B, 309–315 Chothia, C. (1992) Nature 357, 543–544Google Scholar
  2. Dayhoff, M.O. (1976) Fed. Proc. 35, 2132–2138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dayhoff, M.O., Barker, W.C., and Hunt, L.T. (1976) in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure 1976, Vol. 5Google Scholar
  4. Suppl. 2, Dayhoff, M.O., ed., pp. 9–19, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Spring, MD Dayhoff, M.O., McLaughlin, P.J., Barker, W.C., and Hunt, L.T. (1975) Naturwissenschaften 62, 154–161 Gonnet, G.H., Cohen, M.A., and Benner, S.A. (1992) Science 256, 1443–1445Google Scholar
  5. Green, P., Lipman, D., Hillier, L., Waterson, R., States, D., and Claverie, J.-M. (1993) Science 259, 1711–1716. Harris, N., Hunter, L., and States, D.J. (1992) in Proceedings of the Tenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-92), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 837–842.Google Scholar
  6. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J.G. (1991) Nucl. Acids Res. 19, 6565–6572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Henikoff, S., and Henikoff, J.G. (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 10915–10919Google Scholar
  8. Hunkapiller, T., and Hood, L. (1986) Nature 323, 15–16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moncrief, N.D., Kretsinger, R.H., and Goodman, M. (1990) J. Mol. Evol. 30, 522–562Google Scholar
  10. Nakayama, S., Moncrief, N.D., and Kretsinger, R.H. (1992) J. Mol. Evol. 34, 416–448Google Scholar
  11. Pearson, W.R., and Lipman, D.J. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci USA 85, 2444–2448Google Scholar
  12. Sander, C., and Schneider, R. (1991) Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 9, 56-–68Google Scholar
  13. States, D.J., Harris, N.L., and Hunter, L. (1993) in Proceedings: First International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 387–394Google Scholar
  14. Williams, A.F., and Barclay, A.N. (1988) Ann. Rev. Inununol. 6, 381–405Google Scholar
  15. Zuckerkandl, E. (1975) J. Mol. Evol. 7, 1–57Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Winona C. Barker
    • 1
  • Friedhelm Pfeiffer
    • 2
  • David G. George
    • 1
  1. 1.Protein Information ResourceNational Biomedical Research FoundationUSA
  2. 2.Martinsried Institute for Protein SequencesMax Planck Institute for BiochemistryMartinsriedGermany

Personalised recommendations